Factores asociados a infecciones serias en pacientes hospitalizados con lupus eritematoso sistémico / Factors associated with serious infections in patients hospitalized with systemic lupus erythematosus

RESUMEN Introducción. En pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) existe incremento de infecciones debido a la propia enfermedad, al uso de inmunosupresores y corticoides. Objetivo. Identificar los factores asociados a infecciones serias en pacientes lúpicos en un hospital de referencia nacional. Estudio retrospectivo, analítico, de casos y controles en el Servicio de Reumatología del Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima, Perú. Métodos. Se analizó el registro de pacientes hospitalizados en el periodo de estudio, los casos fueron pacientes en los que se demostró la etiología de la primera infección durante su hospitalización. Los controles fueron pacientes lúpicos hospitalizados sin infecciones en el mismo periodo de estudio. Se analizaron variables asociadas al desarrollo de infecciones. Resultados. 61 pacientes de 390 hospitalizados desarrollaron infecciones durante su hospitalización. 48 desarrollaron 1 solo evento infeccioso (en 40 se demostró etiología). Los casos tuvieron mayor actividad, daño y comorbilidad en comparación con los controles. En el análisis univariado, el salario (p=0,031), el uso de inmunosupresores a la admisión (previo: p=0,004 y actual: p=0,004), el uso de glucocorticoides (<30 días: p=0,015 y >30-360 días: p=0,028), la actividad (p=0,029) y el daño (p=0,026) producido por la enfermedad, y el tiempo de hospitalización (p=0,045) tuvieron asociación estadísticamente significativa. En el análisis multivariado, los días de hospitalización se asociaron al desarrollo de infecciones. Conclusiones. Existió asociación entre días de hospitalización y el desarrollo de infecciones serias en pacientes lúpicos durante el periodo de estudio.

ABSTRACT Introduction. Lupus patients have an increased risk of developing infections due to the disease, use of immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. Objective. To identify the associated factors for serious infections in lupus patients in a national referral hospital. Retrospective, analytical, case-control study in the Rheumatology Service of the Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen National Hospital, Lima, Peru. Methods. The registry of hospitalized patients in the study period was analyzed, the cases were patients in whom the etiology of the first infection developed their hospitalization. Controls were hospitalized lupus patients without infections in the same study period. Variables predisposing to the development of infections were analyzed. Results. 61 patients out of 390 hospitalized developed infections during their hospitalization. 48 developed 1 only infectious event (in 40 an etiology developed). The cases had higher damage, activity and comorbidity compared to the controls. In the univariate analysis, salary (p = 0.031), use of immunosuppressants upon admission (previous: p = 0.004 and current: p = 0.004), use of glucocorticoids (<30 days: p = 0.015 and> 30-360 days: p = 0.028), activity (p = 0.029) and damage (p = 0.026) produced by the disease and length of hospitalization (p = 0.045), had a statistically significant association. In the multivariate analysis, the days of hospitalization were associated with the development of infections. Conclusions. There is an association between days of hospitalization and the development of serious infections in lupus patients in the study period.

Clinical features, damage accrual, and survival in patients with familial systemic lupus erythematosus: data from a multi-ethnic, multinational Latin American lupus cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical features, damage accrual, and survival of patients with familial and sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A multi-ethnic, multinational Latin American SLE cohort was studied. Familial lupus was defined as patients with a first-degree SLE relative; these relatives were interviewed in person or by telephone. Clinical variables, disease activity, damage, and mortality were compared. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard adjusted for potential confounders for time to damage and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 66 (5.6%) patients had familial lupus, and 1110 (94.4%) had sporadic lupus. Both groups were predominantly female, of comparable age, and of similar ethnic distribution. Discoid lupus (OR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.08-3.60) and neurologic disorder (OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.00-2.73) were significantly associated with familial SLE; pericarditis was negatively associated (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.87). The SLE Disease Activity Index and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) were similar in both groups, although the neuropsychiatric (45.4% vs. 33.5%; p = 0.04) and musculoskeletal (6.1% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.02) domains of the SDI were more frequent in familial lupus. They were not retained in the Cox models (by domains). Familial lupus was not significantly associated with damage accrual (HR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.30-1.55) or mortality (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.26-4.81). CONCLUSION: Familial SLE is not characterized by a more severe form of disease than sporadic lupus. We also observed that familial SLE has a higher frequency of discoid lupus and neurologic manifestations and a lower frequency of pericarditis.

Riesgo de enfermedad tuberculosa en pacientes con artritis reumatoide / Tuberculosis risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Antecedentes: Los estudios sobre riesgo de enfermedad tuberculosa (ET) en artritis reumatoide (AR) en pacientes no usuarios de terapia biológica son controversiales. Objetivo: Evaluar AR como factor de riesgo independiente para ET. Diseño: Estudio de cohortes no concurrente. Lugar: Red asistencial Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima-Perú, hospital docente. Participantes: Pacientes con AR no usuarios de terapia biológica. Intervenciones: Una cohorte de pacientes con AR no usuarios de terapia biológica (cumplimiento de criterios 1987 del ACR) fue pareada por edad y género con una cohorte control (pacientes con trastornos no inmunológicos). Se realizó una entrevista personal. El seguimiento para la cohorte AR se inició en el diagnostico de AR y culminó en el momento de la entrevista o en el diagnóstico de ET (los controles fueron seguidos el mismo periodo de tiempo). Se calculó la densidad de incidencia (DI) para ET en cada cohorte y el riesgo relativo (RR). La probabilidad de ET de acuerdo al tiempo de enfermedad fue comparada mediante curvas de Kaplan Meier. Se aplicó un modelo de Cox para ajustar drogas y patologías predisponentes (hazard ratio -HR). Principales medidas de resultados: Enfermedad tuberculosa en pacientes con artritis reumatoide. Resultados: La cohorte AR y los controles (667 y 664 pacientes, respectivamente) tuvieron 6 940,75 y 6 666,53 personas-año de seguimiento. La edad al diagnóstico...

Background: Studies on tuberculosis (TB) risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) non-users of biological therapy show contradictory results. Objetives: To determine RA as independent risk factor for TB. Design: Non concurrent cohort study. Setting: Guillermo Almenara Asistential Net, Lima-Peru, a teaching hospital. Participants: Biological therapy non-users RA patients. Interventions: RA patients fulfilled the ARA 1987 diagnosis criteria and were biological therapy non-users. Control group was paired by age and sex to RA patients. Patients in control groups had non immunological disorders. Clinical information was completed by interviews. RA patients follow-up was started at the time of diagnosis and ended at the time of interview and/or TB diagnosis. Density incidence (DI) was found for each cohort and TB relative risk (RR) was calculated. To evaluate time length to TB evolution a Kaplan Meier curve was graphed and compared both groups with log-rank test. Drugs and predisposing TB pathologies were analyzed. Main outcome measures: Tuberculosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results: Six hundred and seventy six out of 808 RA patients and 664 controls qualified for inclusion criteriaÆs. RA and control groups reached 6 940,75 and 6 666,53 follow-up patients-year, respectively. RA cohort mean age was 46,65 at RA diagnosis. Only 29,7 per cent of RA patients had a positive tuberculin reaction. Fifteen TB cases were identified in the RA cohort and 8 at the control group, yielding a mean DI of 216,1/100 000 and 122,1/ 100 000 patients-year respectively. TB RR was 1,8 (IC 95 per cent=0,8- 4,2), and after adjusting drugs and co-morbidity the HR was 1,69 (IC 95 per cent =0,26-10,93). Statistically significant difference was not found with Kaplan Meier curves comparison (p=0,19). Conclusions: We did not find a higher risk of rheumatoid arthritis patients to develop tuberculosis.