Long-term Efficacy of Oral Valganciclovir in Presumed Cytomegalovirus Unilateral Hypertensive Anterior Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To describe long-term efficacy and safety of oral valganciclovir in the treatment of presumed cytomegalovirus (CMV) unilateral hypertensive anterior uveitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of 40 patients (40 eyes). RESULTS: All patients presented with high intraocular pressure (mean 39.35 ± 7.58 mmHg), associated with signs of mild anterior uveitis. Oral valganciclovir resulted in control of the intraocular pressures and inflammation in 35 eyes. At the dose of ≥450 mg twice daily, no relapses were documented. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 108 months (24.45 ± 14.56). At the final follow-up, the intraocular pressure was reduced to 14.92 ± 2.43 mmHg (<0.001). Drug-related complications in the form of leukopenia and azoospermia were reported in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Oral valganciclovir effectively and safely controls intraocular pressure and inflammation in presumed CMV anterior uveitis. A long-term treatment course seems necessary.

Variable presentations of six conjunctival/limbal ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) cases: How good is our clinical judgment evidenced by the correlation to the histopathological findings and diagnosis?

INTRODUCTION: Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) may have atypical or unusual presentations and may attain large sizes especially in cases of delayed presentation resulting in late diagnosis, treatment, and eventual guarded visual prognosis. We are reporting an interesting cases series of OSSN with variable clinical presentations to highlight the importance of the pre-operative clinical judgment and tissue diagnosis. PRESENTATION OF CASES: Six patients (4 females and 2 males; mean age 59 years; range 42-79 years) were included with suspicious conjunctival lesions. The maximum dimension of the lesions was 17 mm. The initial suspected pre-operative clinical diagnosis -other than OSSN- included pterygium/pinguecula (n = 2), benign squamous papilloma (n = 1), cyst versus pyogenic granuloma (n = 1), and lymphoma (n = 1). This work has been reported in line with the PROCESS criteria. DISCUSSION: The final histopathological diagnosis was unexpectedly invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 4, one SCC in-situ, and squamous dysplasia in one. The primary treatment included MMC 0.02 % for 2 cycles for chemo-reduction in one of the cases where OSSN was suspected. Excisional biopsy was performed eventually for all lesions with application of one or more of the following modalities: MMC 0.02 %, absolute alcohol 99 %, and cryotherapy to the conjunctival margin. No tumor recurrence was noted in any of the patients after an average period of follow-up of 26 months. Even though the outcome was good, tumor-related morbidity and delay in the referral by general ophthalmologists are to be considered. CONCLUSION: Conjunctival OSSN has wide presentation clinically and can be challenging in terms of diagnosis. Histopathological evaluation is essential for a definitive diagnosis and treatment. Accurate clinical diagnosis might affect the management plan with consideration for topical therapeutic modalities, however, these cases are best managed by wide excision using the no-touch technique and double-freeze-thaw cryotherapy to the conjunctiva with consideration of topical chemotherapy.