Cutaneous adverse reactions to coronavirus vaccines: A Saudi nationwide study.

The coronavirus vaccine was developed to help overcome the COVID-19 crisis. This study aimed to identify the cutaneous side effects secondary to Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines in the general population of Saudi Arabia and to list the risk factors for the development of cutaneous side effects. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021, self-administered surveys were distributed electronically through social media, and telephonic interviews were conducted with a sample size of 1000 participants. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. A total of 1021 patients (229 male and 722 female) aged 12 years or older were included. While 833 participants were medically free, 188 had chronic illnesses. While 802 participants were not taking any medications, 219 were taking medications regularly. Oxford-Astra Zeneca and Pfizer BioNTech vaccines were administered to 319 and 702 participants, respectively. One-hundred and twenty-five participants previously had COVID-19 infection and 407 were exposed to a PCR positive case of COVID. Six hundred and fifty-nine patients (64.5%) reported experiencing injection site reactions: 606 (59.4%) had injection site pain, 168 (16.5%) had injection site swelling, and 107 (10.5%) had injection site redness. Only 51 patients (5%) experienced cutaneous side effects after injection. A significant association was found between chronic illnesses and cutaneous side effects post-vaccine (9% vs. 4.1%; p value = 0.005). Patients on medications showed a higher rate of symptoms (8.2% vs. 4.1%; p value = 0.005). Age, gender, vaccine types, and history of COVID-19 infection were not significantly associated with cutaneous side effects post-vaccine.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of Q-switched and picosecond lasers in the treatment of nevus of Ota: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nevus of Ota is cosmetically burdensome and often prompts patients to seek treatment. Lasers are commonly used in removing these lesions; however, no systemic analysis has been conducted to support a gold standard laser. To conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers (QSNL), Q-switched ruby lasers (QSRL), Q-switched alexandrite lasers (QSAL), and picosecond alexandrite lasers (PSAL) in removing nevus of Ota. Inclusion criteria were nevus of Ota patients treated with QSNL, QSRL, QSAL, or PSAL and documentation of percent clearance and the rate of at least one adverse event. Articles in English, Chinese, or Japanese were included. The prespecified outcome measures were efficacy (percent clearance) and safety (rates of hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, scarring, and recurrence). The review included 57 studies and 13,417 patients. The pooled success rate was 64% for QSNL (95% CI 52-76%), 54% for QSRL (95% CI 39-69%), 58% for QSAL (95% CI 44-72%), and 100% for PSAL (95% CI 98-102%). The pooled adverse event rate was 5% for QSNL (95% CI 4-6%), 14% for QSRL (95% CI 9-19%), 9% for QSAL (95% CI 6-12%), and 44% (95% CI 31-57%) for PSAL. QSNL has the most evidence for effectively and safely treating nevus of Ota. PSAL potentially has a superior efficacy; however, further studies are needed to elucidate its side effect profile when treating nevus of Ota.

Atypical Palmar Involvement with Erythema Elevatum Diutinum as a Sole Manifestation: A Report of Two Cases.

Erythema elevated diutinum (EED) is a rare distinctive form of cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis. EED typically presents with asymptomatic symmetrical erythematous-brown papules, nodules or plaques which favor the extensor aspect of extremities while distinctly sparing the palms. We report two cases of EED with a rare presentation limited to the palms.