Safety and Efficacy of Acute Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis with Sodium Bicarbonate versus an Antibiotic Catheter Locking Solution.

This study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of acute central venous catheters (CVC) using a sodium bicarbonate catheter locking solution (SBCLS) versus an antibiotic catheter locking solution (ACLS). Our study included patients aged >18 years on hemodialysis initiated through an internal jugular non-tunneled CVC. Safety was assessed by comparing catheter loss resulting from catheter dysfunction (CD) and catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) in two study groups: the SBCLS group (using 7.5% sodium bicarbonate) and the ACLS group (using antibiotic + heparin). Efficacy was assessed by the adequacy of blood flow (>300 mL/min). In total, 160 patients were included: 80 with the SBCLS and 80 with the ACLS. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical demographics between the groups. The average duration of the catheters was 23 days in the ACLS group and 22 days in the SBCLS group. In the ACLS group, four lost catheters to CD, two lost them to CRBSI, and five lost them to other malfunctions. Adequate blood flow was achieved in 71 patients. In the SBCLS group, three lost catheters to CD, three lost them to CRBSI, and four lost them to other malfunctions. Adequate blood flow was achieved in 73 patients. No significant differences between the groups were observed for catheter loss to CRBSI (P = 0.648), CD (P = 0.699), malfunction (P = 0.731), and blood flow (P = 0.598). The safety and efficacy of non-tunneled CVC with sodium bicarbonate as the catheter locking solution were similar to those of the ACLS.

Renal and Hepatic Outcomes after Remdesivir Therapy in Coronavirus Disease-2019-Positive Patients with Renal Dysfunction at Baseline or after Starting Therapy.

We aimed to study the effect of remdesivir therapy on renal and hepatic function in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients with renal dysfunction at baseline or after starting therapy and identify the factors, if any, related to the efficacy of remdesivir therapy on patient outcome. Patients included in the study were those who met all the following criteria irrespective of baseline glomerular filtration rate [including those already on maintenance hemodialysis (HD)] or baseline deranged liver function test. (1) Age >18 years, (2) COVID-19 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction positive, (3) Meeting criteria for administration of remdesivir - [any one of the following: (a) COVID-19 pneumonia with respiratory rate >30/min or SPO2<94% on room air, (b) Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)]. (4) Renal dysfunction at baseline, during or within 48 h of completion of therapy. Thirty-four patients had renal dysfunction at baseline or developed it after remdesivir therapy - 16 were acute kidney injury (AKI), 10 chronic kidney diseases (CKD), four CKD stage 5D, and four were postrenal transplant. The overall mortality was 18/34 (52.9%). Eight out of 30 (26.66%) needed HD during or after therapy and of these, 15 died and among 15 survivors, 14 returned to their baseline renal function after cessation of therapy, one patient is still dialysis dependent. In the dialysis-dependent CKD (n = 4) subgroup, three died and one was discharged. In the postrenal transplant (n = 4) group, all developed AKI during or after the completion of therapy. None required HD, two returned to their baseline renal function, and two died. Only five had alanine aminotransferase elevation (×1 upper limit of normal) during or within 48 h of completion of therapy - three died and two returned to baseline. Lower PaO2/FiO2 (severe ARDS) (P = 0.0001), higher C-reactive protein (P = 0.022), higher serum lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.038), and duration of symptoms before starting therapy (P = 0.05) were statistically significant variables at baseline associated with higher mortality. Remdesivir can be tried in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 cases with renal dysfunction as a complete recovery of renal function was noted in survivors. However, larger and well-controlled studies evaluating its safety and efficacy in patients with AKI and CKD are needed.