The effect of using synthetic vs. biological dural substitutes during prenatal and postnatal repair of spina bifida on spinal cord tethering-a review of literature.

Spina bifida is a congenital neural tube closure defect, with myelomeningocele being the most clinically significant open neural tube defect occurring in one in 1000 births worldwide as reported by Phillips LA et al. (Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 47(7):173-177, 2017) and Zerah M and Kulkarni AV (Handb Clin Neurol 112:975-991, 2013). With advances in fetal surgery, this condition can be corrected in utero. Despite such precision surgery, many complications may still arise, with consequent spinal cord tethering being a major one. When the roots of the spinal cord adhere to the spinal canal instead of floating freely within the dural sleeve within the canal, it is termed as "tethering" as discussed by Martínez-Lage JF et al. (Neurocirugia (Astur) 18(4):312-319, 2007). Tethering has a variety of complications, which are best avoided by analyzing the outcomes of the different dural substitutes and improving surgical techniques. This literature review evaluates the use of different dural substitutes in fetal and postnatal surgery, with their effects on spinal cord tethering. Finding a significant difference in spinal cord adherence outcomes between these two groups can help one introspect on the impact of ideal surgical techniques to be implemented, thus reducing subsequent tethering and other future surgical interventions.

Purely Endoscopic Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach to the Pineal Region in Pediatric Population.

Pineal lesions represent less than 1% of all brain tumors (Villani et al., Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:1-6, 2007). The abysmal location and critical neurovascular structures remain a surgical challenge, despite the advent of microneurosurgery. The classical wide surgical suboccipital craniotomy with the supracerebellar infratentorial approach, described by Sir Victor Horsley (Victor, Proc R Soc Med 3:77-78, 1910), is infamous for its considerable surgical morbidity and mortality. This was later upgraded microneurosurgically by Stein to improve surgical outcomes (Stein, J Neurosurg 35:197-202, 1971).Ruge et al. reported the first purely endoscopic fenestration of quadrigeminal arachnoid cysts via this corridor (Ruge et al., Neurosurgery 38:830-7, 1996). A cadaver-based anatomical study by Cardia et al. demonstrated the viability for endoscope-assisted techniques (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 2006;104(6 Suppl):409-14). However, the first purely endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial (eSCIT) approach to a pineal cyst was performed in 2008 by Gore et al. (Gore PA et al., Neurosurgery 62:108-9, 2008).Unlike transventricular endoscopy, eSCIT approach poses no mechanical risk to the fornices and can be utilized irrespective of ventricular size. More vascular control and resultant reduction in uncontrolled hemorrhage improve the feasibility of attaining complete resection, especially around corners (Zaidi et al,, World Neurosurg 84, 2015). Gravity-dependent positioning and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion aid cerebellar relaxation, creating the ideal anatomical pathway. Also, angle of the straight sinus, tentorium, and tectal adherence can often influence the choice of approach; thus direct endoscopic visualization not only counteracts access to the engorged Galenic complex but also encourages sharp dissection of the arachnoid (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 104:409-14, 2006). These tactics help provide excellent illumination with magnification, making it less fatiguing for the surgeon (Broggi et al., Neurosurgery 67:159-65, 2010).The purely endoscopic approach thwarts the dreaded risk of air embolisms, via simple copious irrigation from a small burr hole (Shahinian and Ra, J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74:114-7, 2013). The tiny opening and closure are rapid to create, and the smaller wound decreases postoperative pain and morbidity. Recent literature supports its numerous advantages and favorable outcomes, making it a tough contender to traditional open methods.

Quad Fever in a Case of Cervical Cord Injury-A Rare Case Report.

By definition, "quad fever" is an extreme elevation in body core temperature beyond 40.8°C (105.4°F) in a patient with spinal cord injury. This type of central nervous system hyperpyrexia is seen in spinal cord injury patients, particularly those with high cervical spine injury with quadriplegia. However, it has also been described in paraplegics with a mid- or higher level thoracic spine injury. The incidence of "quad fever" is rare, with the highest reported temperature being 44°C (111.2°F) with chronicled fatal outcomes. Though the use of antipyretics is generally efficacious, they are considerably ineffective in treating the hyperpyrexia seen in this type of severe central autonomic thermodysregulation. Here, we present a case of high cervical spine injury in a 24-year-old male. The trauma resulted in a C3-5 level cord contusion with incomplete quadriplegia (ASIA [American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale] grade B). The patient developed high grade fever of 106°F within a week of admission postoperatively. Pancultures were negative and the wound was clean. Despite treatment with higher antibiotics and an infection disease specialist's consult, no obvious etiology was found. Drug-induced fever and thyroid function tests were excluded in other less-common causes. Based on the diagnosis of exclusion, "quad fever" was inferred as the cause. He had other signs of autonomic instability during the episodes such as bradycardia with hypotension. Our patient showed an almost early response to treatment to betablockers and antipsychotics after failure to respond to antibiotics, mechanical hypothermia, and antipyretics.

Primary Cutaneous Apocrine Carcinoma of the Scalp: A Rare Case Report.

Primary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma of the scalp is a rare adnexal sweat gland neoplasm. It is most commonly observed over eyelids and ear canals and is often confused with dermoid and epidermoid cysts, lipomas, cutaneous metastatic lesions, or basal cell carcinomas. We describe a 66-year-old male who presented with a midline scalp lesion. He was treated surgically with a wide local excision.

Pharmacologic and Regenerative Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

This is a review article examining the pharmacologic and regenerative cell therapy for spinal cord injury. A literature search during last 10 years were conducted using key words. Case reports, experimental (nonhuman) studies, papers other than English language were excluded. Up-to-date information on the pharmacologic and regenerative cell therapy for spinal cord injury was reviewed and statements were produced to reach a consensus in 2 separate consensus meeting of WFNS Spine Committee. The statements were voted and reached a consensus using Delphi method. Pharmacologic and regenerative cell therapy for spinal cord injury have long been an interest of many experimental and clinical researches. Clinical studies with methylpredinisolone have not shown clear cut benefit. Other drugs such as Rho inhibitor, minocycline, riluzole, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor have also been tried without significant benefits. Regenerative cell therapy using different types of stem cells, different inoculation techniques, and scaffolds have undergone many trials highlighting the efficacies of cells and their limitations. This review article summarizes the current knowledge on pharmacologic and regenerative cell therapy for spinal cord injury. Unfortunately, there is a need for further experimental and human trials to recommend effective pharmacologic and regenerative cell therapy.