RESUMO
Swallowing is a primary and complex behaviour that transports food and drink from the oral cavity, through the pharynx and oesophagus, into the stomach at an appropriate rate and speed. To understand this sophisticated behaviour, a tremendous amount of research has been carried out by utilising the in vivo approach, which is often challenging to perform, poses a risk to the subjects if interventions are undertaken and are seldom able to control for confounding factors. In contrast, in silico (computational) and in vitro (instrumental) methods offer an alternate insight into the process of the human swallowing system. However, the appropriateness of the design and application of these methods have not been formally evaluated. The purpose of this review is to investigate and evaluate the state of the art of in vitro and in silico swallowing simulators, focusing on the evaluation of their mechanical or computational designs in comparison to the corresponding swallowing mechanisms during various phases of swallowing (oral phase, pharyngeal phase and esophageal phase). Additionally, the potential of the simulators is also discussed in various areas of applications, including the study of swallowing impairments, swallowing medications, food process design and dysphagia management. We also address current limitations and recommendations for the future development of existing simulators.
RESUMO
Soft robotic systems are well suited for developing devices for biomedical applications. A bio-mimicking robotic soft esophagus (RoSE) is developed as an in vitro testing device of endoprosthetic stents for dysphagia management. Endoprosthetic stent placement is an immediate and cost-effective therapy for dysphagia caused by malignant esophageal strictures from esophageal cancer. However, later stage complications, such as stent migration, could weaken the swallow efficacy in the esophagus. The stent radial force (RF) on the esophageal wall is pivotal in avoiding stent migration. Due to limited randomized controlled trials in patients, the stent design and stenting guidelines are still unconstructive. To address the knowledge deficit, we have investigated the capabilities of the RoSE by implanting two stents (stent A and B) of different radial stiffness characteristics, to measure the stent RF and its effect on the stent migration. Also, endoscopic manometry on the RoSE under peristalsis has been performed to study the impact of stenting and stent dysfunctionality on the intrabolus pressure signatures (IBPSs) in the RoSE, and further its effects on the swallowing efficacy. Each implanted stent in the RoSE underwent a set of experiments with various test variables (peristalsis velocity and wavelength, and bolus concentrations). In this study, the conducted tests are representative of the application of RoSE to perform a wide-ranging assessment of the stent behavior. The usability of RoSE has been discussed by comparing the results of stent A and B, for various combinations of the test variables mentioned earlier. The results have demonstrated that the stiffer stent B has a higher RF, whereas stent A maintained its RF at a low profile due to its lesser stiffness. The results have also implicated that a high RF is necessary to minimize the stent migration under prolonged peristaltic contractions in the RoSE. For the manometry experiments, stent A slightly increased the IBPS, but the stiffer stent B significantly decreased the IBPS, especially for the higher concentration boluses. It was found that if a stiffer stent buckles, it can reduce the swallow efficacy and cause recurrent dysphagia. Therefore, RoSE is an innovative soft robotic platform that is capable of testing various endoprosthetic stents, thereby offering a solution to many existing clinical challenges in the area of stent testing.
