Immunisation of pigs with recombinant HEV vaccines does not protect from infection with HEV genotype 3.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a major cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide. Up to now, no approved treatment nor a globally licensed vaccine is available. Several recombinant HEV vaccines have been developed to protect against HEV infection in humans, including the commercially available Hecolin vaccine, which are mainly based on HEV genotype 1. However, the efficacy of these vaccines against other HEV genotypes, especially genotype 3 is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the protective efficacy of Hecolin® and a novel genotype 3-based vaccine p239(gt3) against HEV-3 in a pig infection model. Pigs were divided into three groups: one group was vaccinated with Hecolin®, the second group was vaccinated with p239(gt3), and the control group received no vaccine. All pigs were subsequently challenged with HEV genotype 3 to assess the effectiveness of the vaccines. Although all immunised animals developed a high titer of neutralizing antibodies, the results showed that both vaccine applications could not provide complete protection against HEV (gt3) infection: Two out of four animals of the Hecolin® group displayed even virus shedding, and viral RNA could be detected in bile and/or liver of three out of four animals in both vaccination groups. Only one out of four animals in each group was fully protected. Neither Hecolin® nor the novel p239(gt3) vaccine provided sufficient protection against genotype 3 infection. While Hecolin® only partial protected pigs from HEV shedding, the novel p239(gt3) vaccine was at least able to prevent infected pigs from virus shedding. The results highlight the need for further development of HEV vaccines that exhibit broad protection against multiple HEV genotypes and the use of appropriate animal infection models.

Impact of HBsAg and HBcrAg levels on phenotype and function of HBV-specific T cells in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T cells are main effector cells in the control of HBV infection and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is suggested to be a critical factor in the impaired immune response, a hallmark of chronic HBV infection. In addition to HBsAg, other viral markers such as hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) are available, but their potential association with HBV-specific immune responses is not defined yet, which will be important if these markers are used for patient stratification for novel therapies aimed at functional HBV cure. DESIGN: We analysed T cell responses in 92 patients with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic HBV infection with different HBsAg and HBcrAg levels. Overlapping peptides were used for in vitro response analyses (n=57), and HBV core18-specific and polymerase (pol)455-specific CD8+ T cells were assessed in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 patients (n=35). In addition, in vitro responsiveness to anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) was investigated. RESULTS: HBV-specific T cell responses were not affected by HBsAg levels, but rather by age and CD4+ T cell responses were highest in patients with low HBcrAg levels. The phenotypes and functionality of HBV core18-specific and pol455-specific CD8+ T cells differed, but HBsAg and HBcrAg levels did not affect their profiles. Blocking with anti-PD-L1 could restore HBV-specific T cells, but the effect was significantly higher in T cells isolated from patients with low HBsAg and in particular low HBcrAg. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that age and HBcrAg rather than HBsAg, are associated with HBV-specific T cell responses. Finally, very low antigen levels indicated by HBsAg and in particular HBcrAg may influence T cell response to checkpoint inhibition.

Soluble immune markers in the different phases of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may follow four different consecutive phases, which are defined by virology as well as biochemical markers and differ in terms of prognosis and need for antiviral treatment. Currently, host responses reflected by immune markers are not considered in this definition. We aimed to study soluble immune markers and their distribution in different phases of chronic HBV infection. In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we investigated a panel of 14 soluble immune markers (SIM) including CXCL10 in 333 patients with chronic HBV infection. In a small cohort of HBeAg positive patients we analyzed SIM before and after HBeAg seroconversion and compared seroconverters to patients with unknown outcome. Significant differences were documented in the levels of several SIM between the four phases of chronic HBV infection. The most pronounced difference among all investigated SIM was observed for CXCL10 concentrations with highest levels in patients with hepatitis. TGF-ß and IL-17 revealed different levels between HBeAg negative patients. HBeAg positive patients with HBeAg seroconversion presented higher amounts of IL-12 before seroconversion compared to HBeAg positive patients with unknown follow up. SIM such as CXCL10 but also IL-12, TGF-ß and IL-17 may be useful markers to further characterize the phase of chronic HBV infection.