Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in 97 Hospitalized Patients With Cancer: A Call for Standardization.

Hospitalized patients with cancer face pivotal decisions that will affect their cancer care trajectory and quality of life, but frequently lack decision making capacity (DMC). Standardization is conspicuously missing for inpatient oncology teams and for consultation-liaison psychiatrists performing DMC assessments for patients with cancer. This study sought to characterize a single institutional experience of psychiatric consultations to assess DMC. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 97 consecutive psychiatric consultations for DMC from 2017 to 2019. Demographic, hospital-based, and psychiatry consult differences were assessed based on the reasons for DMC evaluation (uncertainty, patient refusal, and emergency) and whether patients had decisional capacity. Out of 97 consultations, 56 (59%) hospitalized patients with cancer were unable to demonstrate capacity. Consultations came from medical services almost exclusively. Only 5% of primary teams documented their own DMC evaluation. Only 22% of DMC evaluation by consultation-liaison psychiatrists documented four determinates of DMC. Few commented on reversibility or tenuousness of DMC, and the identification of agents/surrogates; however, psychiatry consultants were more likely to follow up on patients without DMC. One-third of patients died in the hospital and two-thirds of patients were deceased 3 months after the consult. Given the substantial heterogeneity in the documentation of DMC evaluations in this retrospective chart review, we call for more rigor and standardization in documentation of DMC evaluations.

Management of Fatigue in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO-Society for Integrative Oncology Guideline Update.

PURPOSE: To update the ASCO guideline on the management of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in adult survivors of cancer. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, geriatric oncology, internal medicine, psychology, psychiatry, exercise oncology, integrative medicine, behavioral oncology, nursing, and advocacy experts was convened. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 2013-2023. RESULTS: The evidence base consisted of 113 RCTs. Exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and mindfulness-based programs led to improvements in CRF both during and after the completion of cancer treatment. Tai chi, qigong, and American ginseng showed benefits during treatment, whereas yoga, acupressure, and moxibustion helped to manage CRF after completion of treatment. Use of other dietary supplements did not improve CRF during or after cancer treatment. In patients at the end of life, CBT and corticosteroids showed benefits. Certainty and quality of evidence were low to moderate for CRF management interventions. RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinicians should recommend exercise, CBT, mindfulness-based programs, and tai chi or qigong to reduce the severity of fatigue during cancer treatment. Psychoeducation and American ginseng may be recommended in adults undergoing cancer treatment. For survivors after completion of treatment, clinicians should recommend exercise, CBT, and mindfulness-based programs; in particular, CBT and mindfulness-based programs have shown efficacy for managing moderate to severe fatigue after treatment. Yoga, acupressure, and moxibustion may also be recommended. Patients at the end of life may be offered CBT and corticosteroids. Clinicians should not recommend L-carnitine, antidepressants, wakefulness agents, or routinely recommend psychostimulants to manage symptoms of CRF. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for or against other psychosocial, integrative, or pharmacological interventions for the management of fatigue.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

Drugs, delirium, and ethics at the end of life.

For older persons with delirium at the end of life, treatment involves complex trade-offs and highly value-sensitive decisions. The principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice establish important parameters but lack the structure necessary to guide clinicians in the optimal management of these patients. We propose a set of ethical rules to guide therapeutics-the canons of therapy-as a toolset to help clinicians deliberate about the competing concerns involved in the management of older patients with delirium at the end of life. These canons are standards of judgment that reflect how many experienced clinicians already intuitively practice, but which are helpful to articulate and apply as basic building blocks for a relatively neglected but emerging ethics of therapy. The canons of therapy most pertinent to the care of patients with delirium at the end of life are as follows: (1) restoration, which counsels that the goal of all treatment is to restore the patient, as much as possible, to homeostatic equilibrium; (2) means-end proportionality, which holds that every treatment should be well-fitted to the intended goal or end; (3) discretion, which counsels that an awareness of the limits of medical knowledge and practice should guide all treatment decisions; and (4) parsimony, which maintains that only as much therapeutic force as is necessary should be used to achieve the therapeutic goal. Carefully weighed and applied, these canons of therapy may provide the ethical structure needed to help clinicians optimally navigate complex cases.

Geriatric Communication Skills Training Program for Oncology Healthcare Providers: a Secondary Analysis of Patient and Caregiver Outcomes.

Geriatric cancer patients and their caregivers have unique needs that make it difficult for their healthcare providers (HCPs) to effectively communicate with them. As ineffective communication can lead to negative health outcomes, it is important that oncology HCPs receive specialized training on communication with older adult patients and their caregivers. We conducted a small pilot study examining audio recordings of clinical encounters between HCPs and older adult cancer patients/caregivers and questionnaires completed by the patients and their caregivers before and after the HCPs participated in a geriatric communication skills training program. Eleven HCPs completed the 6-h Geriatric Comskil Training. Two clinic consultations with unique geriatric patients (n = 44) and their caregivers (n = 29) were recorded before and after training and coded for HCPs' use of communication skills. Patients and caregivers also completed surveys measuring their satisfaction with HCP communication and perceived empathy. Analysis of the audio recordings revealed that HCPs did not increase their use of communication skills after training. Although our sample was too small to detect statistical significance, measures of effect size showed trending improvements in patients' and caregivers' perceptions of HCPs' empathy and satisfaction with their communication after training. Our findings build on previous studies evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of the Geriatric Comskil Training in real world setting and indicate that the training may have improved HCPs' communication with older adult patients and their caregivers even if their use of their observable communication skills did not change.

Addressing Challenges With Sedation in End-of-Life Care.

In 2009, Quill and colleagues stipulated that there are three types of sedation practices at the end of life: ordinary sedation, proportionate palliative sedation (PPS), and palliative sedation to unconsciousness (PSU). Of the three, PPS and PSU are described as "last-resort options" to relieve refractory symptoms, and PSU as the most ethically controversial type that "should be quite rare." Unfortunately, little is known about actual sedation practices at the end of life in the United States. This may be due in part to a lack of conceptual clarity about sedation in end-of-life care. We argue that, until more is known about what sedation practices occur at the end of life, and how practices can be improved by research and more specific guidelines, "palliative sedation" will remain more misunderstood and controversial than it might otherwise be. In our view, overcoming the challenges posed by sedation in end-of-life care requires: 1) greater specificity regarding clinical situations and approaches to sedation, 2) research tailored to focused clinical questions, and 3) improved training and safeguards in sedation practices. Terms like PPS and PSU are relatively simple to understand in the abstract, but their application comprises various clinical situations and approaches to sedation. An obvious barrier to empirical research on sedation practices in end-of-life care is the challenge of determining these elements, especially if not clearly communicated. Additionally, we argue that training for palliative care specialists and others should include monitoring and rescue techniques as required competencies.

On taking up space: a qualitative inquiry of depression in older adults with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the phenomenology of depression in older adults with cancer (OACs) in order to improve the accuracy of depression screening for this population. METHOD: Inclusion criteria were: ≥70 years old, history of cancer, no cognitive impairment or severe psychopathology. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, a diagnostic interview, and a qualitative interview. Using a Thematic Content Analysis framework, critical themes, passages, and phrases used by patients to describe their perceptions of depression and how it is experienced were identified. Particular attention was paid to divergences between depressed and non-depressed participants. RESULTS: Among 26 OACs (13 depressed, 13 non-depressed), qualitative analyses revealed four major themes indicative of depression (i.e. anhedonia, reduction in social relationships/loneliness, lack of meaning and purpose, lack of usefulness/feeling like a burden) and four minor themes (i.e. attitude towards treatment, mood, regret/guilt, physical symptoms/limitations). Themes of adaptation and acceptance of symptoms also emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Of the eight themes identified, only two overlap with DSM criteria. This supports the need to develop assessment methods of depression in OACs that are less reliant on DSM criteria and distinct from existing measures. This may improve the ability to identify depression in this population.

Geriatric Oncology Cognition and Communication (Geri-Onc CC): An interactive training for healthcare professionals.

INTRODUCTION: The number of older adults with cancer continues to increase. Many national and international organizations have called for the development of training opportunities for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to meet the unique needs of older adults with cancer and their families. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed and implemented the Geriatric Oncology Cognition and Communication (Geri-Onc CC) training program for HCPs of all disciplines. This program included a two-day, intensive didactic and experiential training followed by six bi-monthly booster videoconference calls. We describe the format and content of this training, the preliminary results of program evaluation, as well as changes in knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward older adults pre- to post-training. RESULTS: We describe data from the first six cohorts of HCPs who attended the training (n = 113). Participants rated the training highly favorably and reported that it met their training goals Mean = 4.8 (1-5 Scale). They also demonstrated a significant increase in their knowledge about geriatric oncology [(Pre-Mean = 6.2, standard deviation [SD] = 1.7; Post-Mean 6.8, SD = 1.6), p = 0.03] and self-efficacy in their ability to utilize the knowledge and skills they learned in the course [(Pre-Mean = 3.3, SD = 0.7; Post-Mean 4.5, SD = 0.4), p < 0.001]. There were no significant changes in attitudes toward older adults (p > 0.05), which were already very positive before the training. DISCUSSION: There is a strong need for training in geriatric oncology. We have demonstrated that implementing this training was feasible, highly regarded, and positively impacted knowledge and self-efficacy regarding utilization of the knowledge and skills learned in the training.

What Proportion of Patients With Musculoskeletal Sarcomas Demostrate Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety?

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that the 12-month prevalence of depression in the United States is 8.6%, and for anxiety it is 2.9%. Although prior studies have evaluated depression and anxiety in patients with carcinoma, few have specifically evaluated patients with sarcoma, who often have unique treatment considerations such as mobility changes after surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated patients with sarcoma seen in our orthopaedic oncology clinic to determine (1) the proportion of patients with depression symptoms, symptom severity, how many patients triggered a referral to mental health professionals based upon our prespecified cutoff scores on the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and if their symptoms varied by disease state; (2) the proportion of patients with anxiety symptoms, symptom severity, how many patients triggered a referral to mental health professionals based upon our prespecified cutoff scores on the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and if they symptoms varied by disease state; (3) whether other factors were associated with the proportion and severity of symptoms of anxiety or depression, such as tumor location in the body (axial skeleton, upper extremity, or lower extremity), general type of tumor (bone or soft tissue), specific diagnosis, use of chemotherapy, length of follow-up (less than 1 year or greater than 1 year), and gender; and (4) what proportion of patients accepted referrals to mental health professionals, when offered. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional survey study performed at a single urban National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center from April 2021 until July 2021. All patients seen in the orthopaedic clinic 18 years of age and older with a diagnosis/presumed diagnosis of sarcoma were provided the PHQ-9 as well as the GAD-7 in our clinic. We did not track those who elected not to complete the surveys. Surveys were scored per survey protocol (each question was scored from 0 to 3 and summed). Specifically, PHQ-9 scores the symptoms of depression as 5 to 9 (mild), 10 to 14 (moderate), 15 to 19 (moderately severe), and 20 to 27 (severe). The GAD-7 scores symptoms of anxiety as 5 to 9 (mild), 10 to 14 (moderate), and 15 to 21 (severe). Patients with PHQ-9 or GAD-7 scores of 10 to 14 were referred to social work and those with scores 15 or higher were referred to psychiatry. Patients with thoughts of self-harm were referred regardless of score. Patients were divided based on disease state: patients during their initial management; patients with active, locally recurrent disease; patients with active metastatic disease; patients with prior recurrence or metastatic lesions who were subsequently treated and now have no evidence of disease (considered to be patients with discontinuous no evidence of disease); patients with no evidence of disease; and patients with an active, noncancerous complication but otherwise no evidence of disease. We additionally looked at the association of gender, chemotherapy administration, and tumor location on survey responses. Data are summarized using descriptive statistics. Differences across categories of disease state were tested for statistical significance using Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables as well as pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: Overall, symptoms of depression were seen in 35% (67 of 190) of patients, at varying levels of severity: 19% (37 of 190) had mild symptoms, 9% (17 of 190) had moderate symptoms, 6% (12 of 190) had moderately severe symptoms, and 1% (1 of 190) had severe symptoms. Depresssion symptoms severe enough to trigger a referral were seen in 17% (32 of 190) of patients overall. Patients scored higher on the PHQ-9 during their initial treatment or when they had recurrent or metastatic disease, and they were more likely to trigger a referral during those timepoints as well. The mean PHQ-9 was 5.7 ± 5.8 during initial treatment, 6.1 ± 4.9 with metastatic disease, and 7.4 ± 5.2 with recurrent disease as compared with 3.2 ± 4.2 if there was no evidence of disease (p = 0.001). Anxiety symptoms were seen in 33% (61 of 185) of patients: 17% (32 of 185) had mild symptoms, 8% (14 of 185) had moderate symptoms, and 8% (15 of 185) had severe symptoms. Anxiety symptoms severe enough to trigger a referral were seen in 16% (29 of 185) of patients overall. Patients scored higher on the GAD-7 during initial treatment and when they had recurrent disease or an active noncancerous complication. The mean GAD-7 was 6.3 ± 3.2 in patients with active noncancerous complications, 6.8 ± 5.8 in patients during initial treatment, and 8.4 ± 8.3 in patients with recurrent disease as compared with 3.1 ± 4.2 in patients with no evidence of disease (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to trigger a referral during initial treatment (32% [9 of 28]) and with recurrent disease (43% [6 of 14]) compared with those with no evidence of disease (9% [9 of 97]) and those with discontinuous no evidence of disease (6% [1 of 16]; p = 0.004). There was an increase in both PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores among patients who had chemotherapy. Other factors that were associated with higher PHQ-9 scores were location of tumor (upper extremity versus lower extremity or axial skeleton) and gender. Another factor that was associated with higher GAD-7 scores included general category of diagnosis (bone versus soft tissue sarcoma). Specific diagnosis and length of follow-up had no association with symptoms of depression or anxiety. Overall, 22% (41 of 190) of patients were offered referrals to mental health professionals; 73% (30 of 41) accepted the referral. CONCLUSION: When treating patients with sarcoma, consideration should be given to potential concomitant psychiatric symptoms. Screening, especially at the highest-risk timepoints such as at the initial diagnosis and the time of recurrence, should be considered. Further work should be done to determine the effect of early psychiatric referral on patient-related outcomes and healthcare costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Delirium in Critically Ill Cancer Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been a devastating pandemic with little known of its neuropsychiatric complications. Delirium is one of the most common neuropsychiatric syndromes among hospitalized cancer patients with incidence ranging from 25% to 40% and rates of up to 85% in the terminally ill. Data on the incidence, risk factors, duration, and outcomes of delirium in critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence, risks and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients who developed COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study evaluating delirium frequency and outcomes in all critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 1 and July 10, 2020. Delirium was assessed by Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit, performed twice daily by trained intensive care unit (ICU) nursing staff. Patients were considered to have a delirium-positive day if Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit was positive at least once per day. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were evaluated. Of those 70, 53 (75.7%) were found to be positive for delirium. Patients with delirium were significantly older than patients without delirium (median age 67.5 vs 60.3 y, P = 0.013). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, chronic medical conditions, neuropsychiatric history, cancer type, or application of prone positioning between the 2 groups. Delirium patients were less likely to receive cancer-directed therapies (58.5% vs 88.2%, P = 0.038) but more likely to receive antipsychotics (81.1% vs 41.2%, P = 0.004), dexmedetomidine (79.3% vs 11.8%, P < 0.001), steroids (84.9% vs 58.8%, P = 0.039), and vasopressors (90.6% vs 58.8%, P = 0.006). Delirium patients were more likely to be intubated (86.8% vs 41.2%, P < 0.001), and all tracheostomies (35.9%) occurred in patients with delirium. ICU length of stay (19 vs 8 d, P < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (37 vs 12 d, P < 0.001) were significantly longer in delirium patients, but there was no statistically significant difference in hospital mortality (43.4% vs 58.8%, P = 0.403) or ICU mortality (34.0% vs 58.8%, P = 0.090). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium in critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 was associated with less cancer-directed therapies and increased hospital and ICU length of stay. However, the presence of delirium was not associated with an increase in hospital or ICU mortality.

Potential use of albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to guide the evaluation and treatment of cancer-related depression and anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are common and associated with inflammation in patients with cancer. Inflammatory indices such as albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) obtained from metabolic panels and complete blood counts should be available for mental health professionals treating anxiety and depression at cancer centers. We hypothesized that albumin and NLR extrapolated from non-mental health oncology appointments would be associated with anxiety and depression and drawn close enough to psychiatry visits to be useful for the psycho-oncologist. MATERIALS & METHODS: Depression and anxiety were evaluated in patients (n = 97) referred to a cancer center psychiatric service for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and General Anxiety Disorder-7. Albumin concentration and NLR were assessed for timing and correlation strength with anxiety and depression by setting (localized/metastatic cancer). RESULTS: Most patients (96%) had albumin or NLR available at any time point of which 45% were drawn within one week of the psychiatric appointment. No significant correlations were noted when evaluating localized cancer or NLR exclusively. For patients with metastatic cancer, anxiety and depression were correlated with albumin at any time point (r = -0.28, p < 0.05; r = -0.40, p < 0.01, respectively) and within a week of psychiatry appointment (r = -0.40, p < 0.05; r = -0.68, p < 0.001, respectively). Albumin evaluated within a week predicted 32% of depression score variance (ß = -0.63, p = 0.002). Hypoalbuminemia (<3.8 g/ul) was associated with anxiety (χ2 = 4.43, p = 0.04) and depression (χ2 = 11.06, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hypoalbuminemia in patients with metastatic cancer may help establish the presence or persistence of anxiety, depression, treatment refractoriness, and the use of inflammation in cancer-related psychological symptom management.

Geriatrics communication skills training program for oncology healthcare providers to improve the management of care for older adults with cancer.

Objective: We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel intervention, the Geriatric Communication Skills Training Program (Geriatric Comskil Training) for multidisciplinary healthcare providers (HCPs). Methods: Three 2-h modules comprised the training: Geriatrics 101, Cognitive Syndromes, and Shared Decision-Making. Modules consisted of didactic knowledge, exemplary videos, and experiential learning role plays with standardized patients. We collected pre- and post-training data from 11 HCPs (module evaluations, self-efficacy, communication skills uptake in interaction with standardized patients, perceived ageism) and 44 patients (perceived HCP empathy, satisfaction with HCP communication). Results: HCPs rated all modules high, with over 90% agreement on all course evaluation items assessing involvement, critical thinking, and reflectiveness, and significant improvements in self-efficacy. HCPs demonstrated an uptake in communication skills from pre- to post-training in agenda setting and overall skill use and reported promising trends towards lower ageism scores (d = 0.58). Promising trends in patient-reported HCP empathy (d = 0.39) and satisfaction with communication (d = 0.29) emerged from pre- to post-training. Conclusion: Continued efforts are needed to strengthen HCP education related to geriatric communication across the cancer continuum. Innovation: The Geriatric Comskil Training demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and increases in self-efficacy and communication skills uptake for HCPs.

Decisional capacity determination and serious mental illness in oncology: Implications for equitable and beneficent care.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) have worse survival compared to cancer patients without SMI after controlling for delayed diagnosis. Decision-making capacity (DMC) may be impaired in both populations (cancer or SMI). DMC may be further impaired based on coupled vulnerability factors that challenge Shared Decision Making (SDM) for patients with cancer and SMI. METHODS: Psychiatric consultations for DMC in hospitalized patients with cancer (n = 97) were consecutively evaluated across a single institution cancer center. SMI data, demographic, and cancer-related variables were obtained from the medical record. Descriptive data were contrasted in patients with and without DMC and used for logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Overall, 42% had DMC with no significant differences based on SMI (χ2  = 2.60, p = 0.11). Patients with SMI were younger, receiving anticancer treatment, and were less likely facing end of life issues. Age (OR 1.03, p = 0.05) and no recent anticancer treatments (OR 0.34, p = 0.02) were associated with decisional incapacity. At 3 months post discharge, almost two-thirds were dead with no difference based on SMI (χ2  = 0.01, p = 0.91). But End of Life (EOL) concerns were documented in 63% of non-SMI patients and only 36% of SMI patients (χ2  = 5.63, p = 0.02). Healthcare proxy (16%), four determinates of DMC (22%), and repeated psychiatric DCM assessments (35%) were documented with no differences based on SMI. CONCLUSION: SDM is not equitable for cancer patients with SMI. Advanced directives and a robust effort to provide value-congruent care for patient with SMI who develop cancer may lessen this health inequity for cancer patients with SMI.

Staff Experiences at a New York City Medical Center During the Spring Peak of the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

Purpose: In March-April 2020, New York City was overwhelmed by COVID-19 infections, leading to substantial disruptions in nearly all aspects of care and operations at most local hospitals. This qualitative study of a quaternary, urban oncology hospital investigated the effects of these disruptions upon a professionally diverse cohort of its employees, including physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, security guards, histology technicians, and environmental services workers. Methods: The participant pool were selected through a combination of purposive and random sampling methodology and coders performed a thematic content analysis of open-ended responses. Results: Analysis revealed several important themes, including concerns about exposure for self and others; patient care as a source of both satisfaction and stress; psychological consequences of uncertainty and ambiguity; family as sources of both comfort and apprehension; the importance of adequate institutional communication; and support from colleagues. Conclusion: Results and analysis provide suggestions for institutional policies and initiatives in the event of a COVID-19 surge or another public health crisis. Administrative efforts should aspire to establish, strengthen, and promote interdisciplinary and interdepartmental efforts to address, and mitigate workplace and personal stressors. through timely and transparent communications, consistent clinical guidance and information about changes in hospital policies and supplemental employee assistance.

COVID-19-Related Ethics Consultations at a Cancer Center in New York City: A Content Review of Ethics Consultations During the Early Stages of the Pandemic.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised a variety of ethical dilemmas for health care providers. Limited data are available on how a patient's concomitant cancer diagnosis affected ethical concerns raised during the early stages of the pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all COVID-related ethics consultations registered in a prospectively collected ethics database at a tertiary cancer center between March 14, 2020, and April 28, 2020. Primary and secondary ethical issues, as well as important contextual factors, were identified. RESULTS: Twenty-six clinical ethics consultations were performed on 24 patients with cancer (58.3% male; median age, 65.5 years). The most common primary ethical issues were code status (n = 11), obligation to provide nonbeneficial treatment (n = 3), patient autonomy (n = 3), resource allocation (n = 3), and delivery of care wherein the risk to staff might outweigh the potential benefit to the patient (n = 3). An additional nine consultations raised concerns about staff safety in the context of likely nonbeneficial treatment as a secondary issue. Unique contextual issues identified included concerns about public safety for patients requesting discharge against medical advice (n = 3) and difficulties around decision making, especially with regard to code status because of an inability to reach surrogates (n = 3). CONCLUSION: During the early pandemic, the care of patients with cancer and COVID-19 spurred a number of ethics consultations, which were largely focused on code status. Most cases also raised concerns about staff safety in the context of limited benefit to patients, a highly unusual scenario at our institution that may have been triggered by critical supply shortages.

Decisional Capacity Determination In Patients With Cancer.

Patients with cancer face many difficult decisions and encounter many clinical situations that undermine decisional capacity. For this reason, assessing decision-making capacity should be thought of at every medical encounter. The culmination of variable disease trajectories, following patients to the end of life, use of high-risk treatments, and other weighty personal decisions require attention to patients' ability to engage in decisions. Oncologists develop meaningful relationships with their patients. This familiarity may lead to forgoing the process of diligently assessing a patient's cognitive ability and/or decisional capacity when important decisions need to be made. While the process may feel like it takes place spontaneously, many subtle and overt details are involved with the decisions around cancer care that require pointed questioning and probing. Thus, there are many ways to fall short in determining decisional capacity. Clinicians are inconsistent in their decisional capacity determinations and generally assume more decisional capacity than the patient has. Consult and referral services such as ethics and psychiatry can help with treatment decisions and with assessing underlying psychosocial and psychiatric conditions. Decisional capacity may fluctuate and requires a variable amount of decisional ability depending on the clinical situation; hence, it is time-specific and decision-specific. This review is intended to provide a summary of key components of decisional capacity while highlighting areas in need of clinical refinement.

Incorporating shared decision making into communication with older adults with cancer and their caregivers: Development and evaluation of a geriatric shared decision-making communication skills training module.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a Communication Skills Training (CST) module for health care providers (HCPs) applying a shared decision-making approach to a meeting with an older adult with cancer and his/her family. METHODS: Ninety-nine HCPs from community-based centers, cancer centers, and hospitals in the Northeastern U.S. who worked primarily with older adult patients participated in a CST module entitled Geriatric Shared Decision Making. Participants completed pre- and post-training Standardized Patient Assessments (SPAs) and a survey on their confidence in and intent to utilize skills taught. RESULTS: Results indicated high HCP satisfaction with the module, with over 95 % of participants reporting high endorsement to all five evaluation items. HCPs' self-efficacy in utilizing communication skills related to geriatric shared decision making significantly increased pre- to post-training. In standardized patient assessments among a subset of providers (n = 30), HCPs demonstrated improvements in three shared decision-making skills: declare agenda, invite agenda, and check preference. CONCLUSION: A geriatric shared decision-making CST workshop for HCPs showed feasibility, acceptability, and improvement in self-efficacy as well as skill uptake. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This Geriatric Shared Decision-Making CST module provides an intervention for improving provider-patient-family member communication in the context of cancer care for older adults.

Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on sustained attention in breast cancer survivors: Evidence for feasibility, tolerability, and initial efficacy.

BACKGROUND: A significant subset of breast cancer survivors experience cognitive difficulties in attention and memory, which persist for years following treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to be effective in improving working memory, attention, processing speed, and other cognitive functions in both healthy and clinical populations. To date, no studies have examined tDCS for rehabilitation of cancer-related cognitive dysfunction. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to provide preliminary evidence for feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and efficacy of tDCS in improving performance on a measure of sustained attention. METHODS: In a within-subjects design, 16 breast cancer survivors underwent 2 consecutive days of active tDCS over the prefrontal cortex, and 2 days of sham tDCS, counterbalanced for order of stimulation condition, while performing a continuous performance test. RESULTS: Stimulation was feasible and tolerable, with 89% of participants completing all sessions, and none reporting more than mild to moderate discomfort. Analyses of efficacy showed that during active stimulation, participants had significantly lower standard errors of reaction times overall, indicating better sustained attention ability, as compared to sham stimulation (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the effect of stimulation on standard errors of reaction times differed by inter-stimulus interval (ISI): for 1 and 2 s ISIs, there was no significant difference in performance between sham and active tDCS conditions, but for 4 s ISIs, stimulation improved variability in response times relative to sham (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that tDCS is feasible, tolerable, and may be an effective intervention to improve sustained attention difficulties in survivors with cancer-related cognitive dysfunction.

Addressing the quality of communication with older cancer patients with cognitive deficits: Development of a communication skills training module.

OBJECTIVE: Effective communication is an essential part of patient-centered care. The complexity of cancer care in older adults makes communication challenging, particularly when older patients have cognitive deficits and lose their autonomy. This paper describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a communication skills training module for health care providers (HCPs) who work with older adults with cancer, with or at risk of developing cognitive deficits. METHOD: Using a pre-post single arm study design, 99 HCPs from a comprehensive cancer center in North-East USA, who worked primarily with geriatric patients, participated in the study. Participants included Advance Practice Providers (including Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants; n = 24, 24.2%); nurses (n = 23, 23.2%), social workers (n = 14, 14.1%), physicians (n = 13, 13.1%), and "other" HCPs (including occupational therapists, physical therapists, and psychologists; n = 20, 20.2%). The HCPs participated in a one-day geriatric communication skills training program in groups of 12-15 over a 2-year period. Participants complete pre-post surveys on module evaluation and perception of self-efficacy as well as pre-post video-recorded Standardized Patient Assessment (SPA) to evaluate communication skill uptake. RESULTS: Most participants evaluated the module positively; over 90% indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed with five of the six module evaluation items. HCPs' self-efficacy in communicating with cancer patients with cognitive deficits significantly increased from pre- to post-module training. There was a significant increase in the following communication skill use from pre- to post-training: checking patient preferences, declaring agenda, and inviting agenda. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Results demonstrated a successful implementation of the program as evidenced through favorable program evaluation, significant gains in self-efficacy, as well as significant improvement in several communication skills.