Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 33: 386-94, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27555197

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of caudal and intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) on postoperative analgesia after caudal bupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal and perineal surgeries. DESIGN: A randomized controlled double-blind study. SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-five American Society of Anesthesiologists I children, aged 1 to 6 years. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups. All patients received 1 mL/kg caudal 0.25% bupivacaine. In addition, those in group B (n=25) received 10-mL IV saline, those in group B-Dcau (n=25) received 1 µg/kg caudal dexmedetomidine and 10-mL IV saline, and those in group B-DIV (n=25) received 1 µg/kg IV dexmedetomidine in 10-mL saline. MEASUREMENTS: Intraoperative mean blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, end-tidal sevoflurane, and bispectral index as well as postoperative pain and behavior scores and time to first analgesia were assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Group B-Dcau had a significantly longer time to first rescue analgesia than groups B-DIV and B, with mean (SD) values of 14.4 (7.5), 9.18 (2.7), and 6.6 (2.5) hours, respectively (P<.05). Fewer patients in group B-Dcau (n=16) required rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to group B (n=24) and group B-DIV (n=20) (P<.05). Groups B-Dcau and B-DIV had lower pain and behavior scores than Group B. Eight patients Group B had agitation compared to 2 in Group B-DIV and 0 in Group B-Dcau. Four patients in Group B-DIV developed bradycardia and hypotension during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to IV administration, caudal administration of dexmedetomidine during caudal bupivacaine anesthesia provided prolonged postoperative analgesia and a greater analgesic sparing effect without significant side effects. This suggests a greater role of neuraxial compared to that of peripheral α-2 adrenoceptors in pain processing.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Caudal/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Bupivacaína/uso terapêutico , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Monitores de Consciência , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Injeções Intravenosas , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Medição da Dor , Agitação Psicomotora/epidemiologia , Agitação Psicomotora/prevenção & controle
2.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 25(9): 883-90, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26033312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data are still insufficient about the effects of different concentrations of caudal dexmedetomidine when used to prolong postoperative analgesia in children. The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and side effects of two doses of caudal dexmedetomidine (1 and 2 µg·kg(-1)) co-administered with bupivacaine in terms of postoperative pain scores and requirement of postoperative analgesia over 24 h in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgery. METHODS: Ninety-one children, aged 1-6 years, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery were included and randomly allocated into three groups of caudal block. Group B received 0.25% bupivacaine 2 mg·kg(-1) (0.8 ml·kg(-1)). Groups BD1 and BD2 received dexmedetomidine 1 and 2 µg·kg(-1), respectively along with bupivacaine 2 mg·kg(-1) in a total volume of 0.8 ml·kg(-1). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in 100% oxygen. Hemodynamic and other routine intraoperative monitoring was carried out in addition to endtidal sevoflurane concentration. Time to spontaneous eye opening and postoperative pain and sedation scores were recorded in addition to time to first analgesia, paracetamol analgesic requirements, and any side effects during the first 24 postoperative hours. RESULTS: Time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in BD1 and BD2 groups compared to B group with mean values (95% CI) of 809 min (652-965), 880 (733-1026), and 396 (343-448), respectively, P < 0.001. Postoperative paracetamol analgesic requirements over 24 h were higher in group B compared to BD1 and BD2 groups (Mean (95% CI): 3.2 (2.9-3.5) doses, 1.9 (1.5-2.3), and 1.6 (1.3-1.9), respectively), P < 0.001. The dexmedetomidine groups had significantly higher postoperative sedation scores compared to plain bupivacaine group that were dose dependent and for longer time in BD2 group. Two patients in BD2 group developed bradycardia and hypotension, and one developed urine retention compared to none in other groups. CONCLUSION: A 1 µg·kg(-1) dose of caudal dexmedetomidine achieved comparable prolongation of postoperative analgesia to 2 µg·kg(-1) dose, with shorter duration of postoperative sedation and lower incidence of other side effects.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Analgesia/métodos , Anestesia Caudal/métodos , Bupivacaína , Dexmedetomidina , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Anestésicos Locais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Lactente , Masculino , Períneo/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA