Failure to rescue following oesophagectomy in Australia: a multi-site retrospective study using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after a major complication, is increasingly being used as a surrogate for assessing quality of care following major cancer resection. The aim of this paper is to determine the failure to rescue (FTR) rate after oesophagectomy and explore factors that may contribute to FTR within Australia. METHODS: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2015 to 2023 at five Australian hospitals was conducted to identify patients who underwent an oesophagectomy. The primary outcome was FTR rate. Perioperative parameters were examined to evaluate predictive factors for FTR. Secondary outcomes include major complications, overall morbidity, mortality, length of stay and 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included with a median age of 65.2 years, 74.8% being male. The FTR rate was 6.3%. In total, 50.3% of patients (n = 78) developed at least one postoperative complication with the most common complication being pneumonia (20.6%) followed by prolonged intubation (12.9%) and organ space SSI/anastomotic leak (11.0%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine any factors that were predictive for FTR however none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to evaluate the FTR rates following oesophagectomy within Australia, with FTR rates and complication profile comparable to international benchmarks. Integration of multi-institutional national databases such as ACS NSQIP into units is essential to monitor and compare patient outcomes following major cancer surgery, especially in low to moderate volume centres.

Gastric diverticulum: a contemporary review and update in management.

BACKGROUND: Gastric diverticula (GD) are the rarest form of gastrointestinal tract diverticulum, with an estimated incidence of 0.013-2.6%. GD are poorly understood and there are no established management guidelines. Only sparse updates have been published since the mid-20th century. This paper reviews the current literature and provides some suggested guidelines for the management of GD. METHODS: A search of Medline via OvidSP and Google Scholar for 'gastric diverticulum' and associated synonyms from the year 1950 onwards was performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and case-control studies, and case series. Full text, English language manuscripts on adult populations were included. RESULTS: A total of 103 manuscripts were included in the final selection - 77 individual case studies, 23 case series and three reviews. No RCTs, cohort or case-control studies were found. The case studies represent 305 patients, 50.8% female with average age 49.2 years (range 18-80). The most common symptom was abdominal pain (48.2%). The average maximum diameter was 3.97 cm (range 0.5-9). One hundred and four patients were managed operatively. Despite persistent recommendations in the literature that GD > 4 cm should be considered for resection, there are no data supporting this approach. CONCLUSION: The evidence pertaining to the management of GD is sparse. The decision for operative management should be individualized and based primarily on the presence of symptoms or complications which may be directly attributable to the GD. Where surgery is indicated, a laparoscopic approach, potentially with intra-operative gastroscopy, is appropriate.

Management of Boerhaave syndrome in Australasia: a retrospective case series and systematic review of the Australasian literature.

BACKGROUND: Boerhaave syndrome is a rare and life-threatening condition characterized by a spontaneous transmural tear of the oesophagus. There remains wide variation in the condition's management with non-operative management (NOM) and surgery being the two main treatment strategies. The aim was to review the presentation, management and outcomes for patients treated for Boerhaave syndrome at our institution and to compare these data with that previously reported within the Australasian literature. METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed for consecutive patients diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome at our institution between January 2000 and January 2020. A systematic review of the Australasian literature was also performed. RESULTS: In case series, 15 patients were included (n = 2 NOM, n = 13 operative). The most common operative technique was primary repair with intercostal drainage via thoracotomy. Major complications occurred in 11 (73%) patients. Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 53.4 (interquartile range: 50). There was a significantly lower Comprehensive Complication Index associated with primary repair when compared to oesophageal resection (P = 0.01). There was one death, in the operative management group. Median length of hospital stay was 33 days (interquartile range: 58). In systematic review, 11 articles were included; four case series and seven case reports. From these, 23 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients (83%) were managed operatively, with only four undergoing NOM. Seven patients died, representing an overall mortality rate of 30%. CONCLUSIONS: We provide an updated overview of the management of Boerhaave syndrome within Australasia. Aggressive operative management is associated with reasonable outcomes.

Improving Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Administration in an Acute Surgical Unit.

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis regimes frequently have a wide variation in application. Nepean acute surgical unit was established in 2006 as a novel model for emergency surgical care. As part of the model's rollout, there were several areas of clinical management targeted for improvement, one being VTE prophylaxis compliance. It was decided all patients older than 18 years treated for a variety of acute surgical conditions within the acute surgical unit should be administered routine VTE prophylaxis with heparin and compression stockings. A novel multifaceted intervention was implemented at the time to achieve this goal. The primary aim of this study was to determine VTE prophylaxis administration rates before and after this intervention. METHODS: A before-after study conducted as a retrospective review of medical records of all patients 18 years or older, having an appendicectomy in 3 periods: Before acute surgical unit (ASU) (November 2004 to October 2006), Early ASU (November 2006 to October 2008), and Established ASU (January 2012 to December 2013). Outcomes were mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis administration rates for each group. RESULTS: There were 1149 patients included in the study: Before ASU, 167; Early ASU, 375; and Established ASU, 607. There was a significant stepwise increase in parmacological VTE prophylaxis administration: Before ASU, 54.5%; Early ASU, 74.7%; and Established ASU, 96.9% (Before versus Early: odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-3.61; P < 0.001; Early versus Established: OR, 10.500; 95% CI, 6.29-17.53; P < 0.001). Mechanical VTE prophylaxis was significantly increased in the established group (Before versus Established: OR, 47.18; 95% CI, 25.61-86.91; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in VTE prophylaxis administration after the implementation of our multifaceted intervention. Allocating a responsible provider dedicated to VTE prophylaxis prescription and compliance checking was a key component to this intervention.

Non-operative management of small post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess is safe and effective.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) post-appendicectomy occurs in 1.4-4.4% of cases. Non-operative management of small (<4 cm) post-appendicectomy IAA in children is well established, but minimal evidence exists in adults. Percutaneous catheter drainage is considered standard treatment for IAA, yet outcome data for post-appendicectomy IAA are sparse. The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of non-operative management of small (<4 cm diameter) IAA and the outcomes of percutaneous drainage for larger (>4 cm) IAA post-appendicectomy. METHODS: A retrospective case note review of a series of patients with a post-appendicectomy IAA between 2006 and 2017 was conducted. IAAs were treated selectively; small (<4 cm) IAAs were managed non-operatively and larger IAAs were managed with percutaneous drainage . RESULTS: A total of 4901 patients had an appendicectomy. Forty-two (0.9%) developed a post-operative IAA. Sixteen (38%) had a percutaneous drainage and 26 (62%) had non-operative management. The percutaneous drainage group had a higher proportion of complicated appendicitis (75%) compared to the non-operative group (42%, P = 0.04). The percutaneous drainage group had a significantly higher leucocytosis (P = 0.01) and C-reactive protein (P = 0.02). All patients managed non-operatively resolved without the need for invasive procedures. In the percutaneous drainage group, six had aspiration alone, nine had a percutaneous drain and one was abandoned. Three required repeat percutaneous drainage and four (25%) required operative drainage. Seven patients (34%) of the percutaneous drainage group had grade II or III complications. CONCLUSION: This case series study provides support that small (<4 cm) IAA post-appendicectomy can be safely and effectively managed non-operatively.

The Unacceptable Morbidity of Negative Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common acute conditions managed by general surgeons is acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is the surgical technique used by many surgeons. The aims of this study were to define our unit's negative appendicectomy rate and compare the outcomes associated with removal of a normal appendix with those for acute appendicitis in patients having LA. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective case note review of patients undergoing LA for suspected acute appendicitis was performed. Patients were divided into positive and negative appendicectomy groups based on histology results. The positive group was subdivided into uncomplicated and complicated (perforated and/or gangrenous) appendicitis. Outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were 1413 patients who met inclusion criteria, 904 in the positive group and 509 in the negative group, an overall negative appendicectomy rate of 36.0%. Morbidity rates (6.3% vs. 6.9%; P = 0.48) and types of morbidity were the same for negative appendicectomy and uncomplicated appendicitis. There was no significant difference in complication severity (all P > 0.17) or length of stay (2.3 vs. 2.6 days; P = 0.06) between negative appendicectomy and uncomplicated appendicitis groups. Patients with complicated appendicitis had a significantly higher morbidity rate compared to negative and uncomplicated groups (20.1% vs. 6.3% and 20.1% vs. 6.9%; both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The morbidity of negative LA is the same as LA for uncomplicated appendicitis. The morbidity of LA for complicated appendicitis is significantly higher. The selection criteria for LA in our unit needs to be reviewed to address the high negative appendicectomy rate and avoid unnecessary surgery and its associated morbidity.

Early Laparoscopic Washout may Resolve Persistent Intra-abdominal Infection Post-appendicectomy.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) complicates 2-3% of patients having an appendicectomy. The usual management is prolonged antibiotics and drainage of the IAA. From 2006, our unit chose to use early re-laparoscopy and washout in patients with persistent sepsis following appendicectomy. The aims of this study were to assess the outcomes of early laparoscopic washout in patients with features of persistent intra-abdominal sepsis and compare those with percutaneous drainage and open drainage of post-appendicectomy IAA. METHODS: A retrospective case note review was performed for all patients having a laparoscopic washout, percutaneous drainage or open drainage following appendicectomy between January 2006 and December 2017. RESULTS: During the period, 4901 appendicectomies occurred. Forty-one (0.8%) patients had a laparoscopic washout, 16 (0.3%) had percutaneous drainage, and 6 (0.1%) had an open drainage. The demographics, ASA grade and pathology at initial appendicectomy were similar. The mean time after appendicectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopic washout (4.1 days vs. 10.1 and 9.0 days, p = <0.003). The mean time for resolution of SIRS was significantly shorter (2.0 days vs. 3.3 and 5.2 days, p <0.02). The morbidity and length of stay were similar. CONCLUSION: Early laparoscopic washout for persistent intra-abdominal sepsis may be an alternative to non-operative management and delayed intervention for IAA and may have better outcomes than either percutaneous drainage or open drainage. A prospective randomised comparison is required to further evaluate the indications and role of early laparoscopic washout post-appendicectomy.

The Established Acute Surgical Unit: A reduction in nighttime appendicectomy without increased morbidity.

INTRODUCTION: Nighttime surgery for non-life threatening disease has been associated with poorer outcomes, but delaying surgery for acute appendicitis may also be detrimental. The aim was to assess the effect of the Acute Surgical Unit [ASU] model on nighttime surgery rates and outcomes for patients undergoing appendicectomy. METHOD: A retrospective review of medical records of patients having an appendicectomy. Primary outcomes were nighttime surgery rate, time from presentation to surgery, perforation rate, complication rate and length of stay. RESULTS: There was a large increase in workload: Pre ASU 278, Early ASU 553 and Est. ASU 923. There was a significant decrease in nighttime surgery rates: Pre ASU 46.9%, Early ASU 30.2% and Established ASU 28.3% (Pre vs. Early p < 0.001; Pre vs. Est. p < 0.001; Early vs. Est p = 0.004). When comparing the Pre ASU and Established ASU groups there was an increase in mean time from presentation to surgery (Pre 14.43 Hrs, Est. 18.65 Hrs; p = 0.001), an increase in perforation rate that was not significant (Pre 9.8%, Est. 14.2%; p = 0.05) and similar complication rates (Pre 8.66%, Est. 7.04%; p = 0.37). There was a significant decrease in length of stay between the Early and Established ASU groups (Pre 3.1 D, Est. 2.8D, p = 0.01). At our institution there was no statistically significant increase in complications for patients undergoing nighttime appendicectomy (Night 10.0%, Day 8.2%; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in nighttime surgery, without any difference in morbidity or length of stay for patients treated within the Established ASU (compared to Pre ASU group). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIb.