BOUNDARIES IN KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT: WHY, WHEN AND HOW.

The use of alternative alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recently increasing in popularity: many of these alignments have been included in the broad spectrum of the "kinematic alignment". This alternative approach was recommended in order to increase patients' satisfaction since many patients-reported-outcome-measures (PROMs) based studies showed that every fifth patient is not satisfied with the surgical outcome. In fact, the original kinematic alignment technique was designed as a "pure resurfacing" technique, maintaining the preoperative axes (flexion-extension and axial rotation) of the knee. In adjunct, many new classifications of the preoperative limb deformity have been proposed to include a large range of knee anatomies, few of them very atypical. Following those classifications, many surgeons aimed for a reproduction of unusual anatomies putting in jeopardy the survivorship of the implant according to the classical "dogma" of a poor knee kinematics and TKA biomechanics if the final HKA (hip-knee-ankle) axis was not kept within 5° from neutral. This article reviews the literature supporting the choice of setting alignment boundaries in TKA when surgeons are interested in reproducing the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range.

Multiplex PCR in septic arthritis and periprosthetic joint infections microorganism identification: Results from the application of a new molecular testing diagnostic algorithm.

Purpose: Pathogen identification is key in the treatment of septic arthritis (SA) and periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). This study evaluates the outcome of the application of a new, score-based SA and PJI diagnostic algorithm, which includes the execution of molecular testing on synovial fluid. Methods: A score-based diagnostic algorithm, which includes serologic and synovial fluid markers determination using multiplex PCR (mPCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) molecular testing, has been applied to a consecutive series of patients with clinically suspected SA or PJI. Patients with a score ≥6 underwent synovial fluid molecular testing, together with traditional culture, to identify the pathogen and its genetically determined antibiotic resistance. Results: One hundred and seventeen joints in 117 patients (62.5% women; average age 73 years) met the criteria for possible SA/PJI. The affected joint was the knee in 87.5% (joint replacement 66.5%; native joint 21%) and the hip in 12.5% (all replaced joints). 43/117 patients (36.7%) were ultimately diagnosed with SA/PJI. Among the various testing technologies applied, mPCR was the main determinant for pathogen identification in 63%, standard culture in 26%, and mNGS in 11%. Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were the top two microorganisms identified by mPCR, while Staphylococcus epidermidis was the prevalent organism identified by NGS. mPCR detected the presence/absence of the genetically determined antibiotic resistance of all identified microorganisms. The average timeframe for pathogen identification was 3.13 h for mPCR, 4.5 days for culture, and 3.2 days for NGS. Conclusions: Molecular diagnostic technologies represent an innovative screening for fast microorganism identification when a joint infection is clinically suspected. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Asymmetric gap balancing improves knee kinematic following primary total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate closer-to-normal knee kinematics following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed establishing asymmetric gap balancing intraoperatively. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Two age-, sex-, BMI-matched groups of patients underwent medially stabilized TKA because of isolated knee disease. Group A (12 patients) underwent "unrestricted" kinematic alignment (uKA) according to Howell while group B (15 patients) received robot-assisted "simplified" KA (sKA) with an alignment goal (Hip-Knee-Ankle axis-HKA) ± 5° respect to the mechanical axis. Intraoperatively, in group B, the flexion gap at 90° was first set at an average of 1.5 mm (0-5 mm; SD 4.4 mm) tighter in the medial compartment with respect to the lateral; in the same way, the extension gap was then set at an average of 2.0 mm (0-4.5 mm; SD 3.1 mm) tighter in the medial compartment with respect to the lateral. All patients, including a non-arthritic cohort (group C: 5 controls) underwent gait analysis using an instrumented treadmill (WalkerView-WV) equipped with an instrumented belt armed with a 3D video camera. The WV software evaluated multiple spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters, including: (1) contact time (s); (2) knee ROM during gait cycle; (3) step length percentage with respect to total gait (%) and pure step length (cm). Statistical analyses included t-Test and ANOVA and were conducted by using SPSS. RESULTS: At the final FU, significant differences were noted during gait between the two TKA groups (uKA-sKA) and the controls. Both TKA groups showed superior mean contact time on the surgical knee (uKA 1 s; sKA 0.97 s) as compared to the controls (0.72 s) (P = 0.002) while no differences were found between them (P = 0.11). TKA groups showed a lower, maximum ROM in the surgical knee (mean uKA 36º; mean sKA 49º) relative to the controls (mean 57º) (P < 0.05) but a statistical difference was found between them (P = 0.003). Both TKA groups showed a higher step length percentage with respect to the total gait and a shorter step length on the surgical side (uKA: mean 8.28% and mean step length 35.5 cm; sKA: mean 8.38% and mean step length 34.6 cm) in comparison to the controls (mean 3.38%; mean step length 71.4 cm) (P < 0.05) while no statistical differences were found between them. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this was the first study to exhibit the kinematic advantages of a slightly asymmetric gap balancing during KA TKA. Combining a medially-stabilized implant design and a surgical technique aiming to obtain a tighter medial compartment represents a promising approach to improve outcomes after TKA.

Histological and clinical analysis of knee cyclops lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Cyclops Syndrome, first described by Jackson and Schaefer in 1990, is known as a complication of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However further researches have demonstrated that cyclops can be present even without symptoms and/or in absence of ACLR, simply configuring itself as a lesion in patients with rupture of the native ligament. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in which we report our experience of 13 cyclops lesions found between 126 patients during a primary arthroscopic ACLR. Preoperative examination with tests of joint stability and range of movement measurement was performed and recorded. Accurate joint examination was performed during arthroscopy and the cyclops lesions found were removed and analyzed with haematoxylin-eosin coloration. Post-operative clinical examination was performed until 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Histological analysis showed proliferation of dense fibroelastic polypoid nodules with a macroscopically histological aspects of a "blue eye", hence the name Cyclops. At 6 months of follow-up after surgery, none of the patients reported pain at terminal extension or instability and they were all able to resume their previous activities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that surgical reconstruction of the ACL is not the only condition in which the Cyclops Syndrome develops; in fact our histological analysis indicate that the Cyclops lesions develop like a reactive fibroproliferative process following the rupture of the native ACL fibers, as scar reaction to the trauma: for this reason an accurate arthroscopic detection of these Cyclops lesions is crucial during primary ACL reconstruction in order to obtain the best surgical outcomes.