Ingestion and surgical retrieval of an endodontic file: a case report.

Ingestions and aspirations of foreign bodies are rare, but do occasionally occur during dental treatment. Although reports exist, few include photos demonstrating the extensive surgical intervention that may be necessary to manage such events. Perhaps this lack of visualization, and associated lack of awareness, is one of the reasons some clinicians still provide non-surgical root canal therapy (NSRCT) without a rubber dam. This case report outlines the medical treatment of a 30-year-old male who initially presented to a general dentist's office (not associated with the authors) for NSRCT of their mandibular right first molar. A rubber dam was not used for this procedure, during which the accidental ingestion of an endodontic K-file occurred. The patient was subsequently hospitalized for evaluation and treatment, consisting of numerous imaging studies, endoscopic evaluation, and surgical removal of the file from his small intestine. The ingestion of foreign bodies, and the associated complications, can be reduced through the routine use of a rubber dam, which is considered the standard of care for NSRCT. This case graphically illustrates the potential consequences associated with deviating from the standard of care and should remind clinicians that a rubber dam is necessary for all cases of NSRCT.

The Pulpal Response to Crown Preparation and Cementation.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and occurrence of pulpal disease in patients who received either full-coverage (crowns) or large noncrown restorations (fillings, inlays, or onlays involving ≥3 surfaces). METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 2177 cases of large restorations placed on vital teeth. Based on the restoration type, patients were stratified into various groups for statistical analysis. After restoration placement, those who required endodontic intervention or extraction were classified as having pulpal disease. RESULTS: Over the course of the study, 8.77% (n = 191) of patients developed pulpal disease. Pulpal disease was slightly more common in the large noncrown group than the full-coverage group (9.05% vs 7.54%, respectively). For patients who received large fillings, there was not a statistically significant difference based on operative material (amalgam vs composite: odds ratio = 1.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.85], P > .05) or the number of surfaces involved (3 vs 4: odds ratio = 0.78 [95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.12], P > .05). The association between the restoration type and the pulpal disease treatment performed was statistically significant (P < .001). The full-coverage group more frequently underwent endodontic treatment than extraction (5.78% vs 3.37%, respectively). Only 1.76% (n = 7) of teeth in the full-coverage group were extracted compared with 5.68% (n = 101) in the large noncrown group. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that ∼9% of patients who receive large restorations will go on to develop pulpal disease. The risk of pulpal disease tended to be highest in older patients who receive large (4 surface) amalgam restorations. However, teeth with full-coverage restorations were less likely to be extracted.

External Cervical Resorption: Relationships between Classification, Treatment, and 1-Year Outcome with Evaluation of the Heithersay and Patel Classification Systems.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify possible associations between classification, treatment, and 1-year outcome of external cervical resorption (ECR) lesions using the Heithersay and Patel systems. Performance of the Patel 3-dimensional classification system was also evaluated. METHODS: A chart review identified 142 cases of ECR over a 12-year period. Information regarding demographics, predisposing factors, lesion classification, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Inter- and intraobserver reliability analyses were conducted for both classification systems. RESULTS: There were 72 cases with at least 1 year of follow up; 70% of these cases survived. Treatment recommendations were correlated with both Heithersay and Patel classification. There were no correlations found between 1-year outcome and either classification or treatment done. The weighted reliability analysis showed substantial agreement in both classification systems for both inter- and intraobserver agreement. There was a significant association between the 2 systems; however, the Heithersay system tended to underestimate the apical extent of the lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Periodic review of ECR lesions presents as a viable treatment option, at least for 1 year after diagnosis. The Patel 3-dimensional classification system is at least as effective as the Heithersay system and should be used in future ECR prognosis studies. Further long-term outcome assessments are still needed.

Incidental Findings in Small Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scans, Part 2: Interpretation with Aid of a Checklist.

INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans are routinely used by endodontic residents and faculty at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine for diagnostic purposes but are not routinely read for pathologic findings by a radiologist. In a 2017 study by Oser et al (part 1), endodontic residents and a radiologist interpreted CBCT scans taken for endodontic diagnostic purposes, and their findings were compared. The results demonstrated that a radiologist is significantly more likely to report incidental findings in small field of view (FOV) scans. A limitation of this study was that the radiologist used a checklist of common findings to review the scans. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the use of a checklist would improve the sensitivity of the endodontic residents' reporting of incidental findings in small FOV CBCT scans. METHODS: The 203 small FOV CBCT scans used in part 1 were obtained and reviewed by endodontic residents in a systematic fashion. Radiographic findings were reported using a blank checklist. The results were compared with those previously reported. RESULTS: The radiologist reported abnormalities in 176 of the 203 subjects (87%), and the residents reported abnormalities in 184 of the 203 subjects (91%). There was an increase in false positive findings when the residents were using a checklist. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a checklist improved the sensitivity but decreased the specificity of the reporting of incidental findings in small FOV CBCT scans by endodontic residents.

Pre-Eruptive Intracoronal Resorption (PEIR): A Case Report.

Pre-Eruptive Intracoronal Resorption (PEIR) is a rare yet significant phenomenon in which an abnormal, well-circumscribed, radiolucent area develops in the tooth prior to eruption. This case report outlines the treatment of a 12 year old Hispanic female who was referred for endodontic evaluation of tooth #31 and subsequently diagnosed with PEIR. The patient's chief complaint was recorded as "spontaneous pain" in the lower right quadrant of her jaw. Clinical examination revealed a partially erupted tooth #31 with no visible decay. Radiographic examination, including a cone beam computed tomography scan, led to the detection of a radiolucent area surrounding the pulp chamber on the mesial aspect of tooth #31. Radiographically, the enamel appeared intact with no signs of perforation. Based on the clinical and radiographic evaluation, tooth #31 was determined to have PEIR, with the pulpal and periapical diagnosis of "Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis" and "Normal Apical Tissue," respectively. The Orthodontic consultation obtained for this patient recommended that tooth #31 be maintained at least until tooth #32 appeared in the oral cavity and could be used as a replacement. Therefore, a treatment plan involving vital pulp therapy and gingivectomy was selected. During the procedure, granulation tissue was excavated and sent for histological evaluation, which concluded the presence of "granulation tissue with acute and chronic inflammation". No caries were detected. Following the procedure, the tooth was found to be asymptomatic with continued root development. A positive response to Electric Pulp Test was achieved after 3.5 years of follow up.

Survey of acceptance of the 2007 American Heart Association guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptance rate of the 2007 American Heart Association (AHA) prophylactic protocol by the patients for whom the need for prophylaxis for infective endocarditis was downgraded. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A survey among patients was conducted. Patients were included if they had to receive antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental treatment according to the 1997 AHA protocol and did not require antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental treatment according to the 2007 AHA guidelines. The perception of the patients and their physicians to the change was analyzed. Possible contributing parameters were assessed. RESULTS: The slight decrease in the rate of acceptance with an increase in time since the AHA publication demonstrated by the logistic regression (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.10) was not statistically significant (P=.41). Parameters related to lower patient acceptance rates were invasiveness of dental treatment and the type of dental setting (P=.046 and .001, respectively). Parameters that were found not to affect the patient acceptance rate were the severity of cardiac condition and a durable history of dental treatments in the same institute (P=.06 and .26, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen months after publication of the 2007 AHA guidelines, the acceptance rate of the protocol is moderate to high. Reasons for this partial acceptance are discussed.