Reconsidering the ability of the stimulus unique features to capture attention: Evidence from change blindness and visual search paradigms.

In Experiment 1 (change blindness), participants received either intermixed or blocked presentations of two visual stimuli that contained several common (X) and unique (A or B) features. On the critical trial after exposure, the stimulus AX was presented but included an unexpected visual event (a change in the size of a stimulus feature). We found that participants readily detected the change when it involved an A-unique feature that had been preexposed intermixed. However, if the change involved an A-unique feature preexposed in blocks, or an X-common feature (preexposed either intermixed or in blocks), the level of the detections considerably decreased. In Experiment 2, after either intermixed or blocked preexposure to AX and BX, all the participants were instructed to search for an unrelated visual target item. In the distractor condition, during the development of the search task, the A-unique feature emerged at an unpredictable location that was different to that occupied by this feature during the preexposure. In the control condition, the target was presented on its own during the entire task. The presence of the A-unique feature only produced a detrimental effect on search performance when the AX and BX had been preexposed intermixed. These results are discussed as indicative of the intermixed preexposure schedule enhancing the ability of the stimulus unique features to capture involuntary attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Instruction-driven processing in human perceptual learning.

We conducted a series of experiments to determine the relative contribution of unsupervised versus controlled mechanisms to the intermixed-blocked effect. In Experiment 1, participants received pre-exposure instructions prompting a search for differences between stimuli, in keeping with past studies, and the intermixed-blocked effect was observed. In the remaining experiments, participants did not receive the aforementioned instructions, but instead were instructed either to simply observe the stimuli (Experiment 2) or in relation to a masking task (Experiment 3). None of the latter experiments produced an intermixed-blocked effect, suggesting that the effect found in Experiment 1 was driven by the instructions to search for differences, consistent with a controlled processing account of the effect. Moreover, we tested a prediction assuming the operation of a search strategy against one assuming the operation of a short-term habituation mechanism and found evidence more consistent with the search strategy hypothesis. We formulate a new account of the intermixed-blocked effect in humans based on an instruction-driven search and discuss how the account could explain many findings in the human literature.

Effects of stimulus salience on the magnitude of latent inhibition after compound conditioning.

The effect of stimulus salience on latent inhibition (the retardation of conditioning produced by prior exposure to the event to be used as the conditioned stimulus [CS]) was examined in an experiment using rats as subjects and the conditioned suppression procedure. The stimuli were a more salient light and a less salient tone-rats trained with light as the CS showed more suppression than rats trained with the tone as the CS; and rats tested with tone and light separately after conditioning with a CS consisting of a tone + light compound showed more suppression to the light than the tone. This pattern of results was reversed, however, in subjects given a series of nonreinforced presentations of the tone and the light separately prior to conditioning with the compound. We conclude that latent inhibition develops more readily for the more salient stimulus and that its effects can outweigh those that derive from the intrinsic salience of the stimulus. Theories of latent inhibition that predict, or can accommodate, this conclusion are considered.

Within-subjects assessment of the within-compound associations resulting from intermixed and blocked preexposure schedules.

Nonhungry rats received training consisting of intermixed presentations of a compound flavor and an element of that compound (AX, X, AX, X, . . .), and then a separate block of presentations of another compound (BX, BX, BX, . . .). Stimuli A and B were two odor solutions (almond and vanilla), and stimulus X was a highly concentrated solution of sucrose. After training, a state of hunger was induced in the rats, and their consumption levels of A and B alone were tested. We found higher test consumption of B than of A (Exp. 1). We interpreted these differences as indicating that the B-X association had become stronger than the A-X association as a result of the training. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that the presence of X during training was necessary for that effect to appear (Exp. 2). These results give support to the recent proposal that within-compound associations are maintained better by blocked than by intermixed preexposure (Rodríguez & Alonso, 2014). We discuss the implications of this difference for explaining the intermixed-blocked perceptual-learning effect.

Differential effect of the intermixed and blocked preexposure schedules on the strength of within-compound associations.

In Experiment 1, we demonstrated an intermixed-blocked effect where intermixed preexposure to a flavor compound and to an element of that compound (AX, X, AX, X . . .) reduced generalization between them more than equivalent blocked preexposure (AX, AX . . . X, X . . . , or X, X, AX, AX). Then we used sensory preconditioning (Experiment 2) and conditioned flavor preference (Experiment 3) procedures to assess the strength of the X-A within-compound association resulting from those preexposure schedules. In both experiments, we observed that the within-compound association was stronger after blocked than intermixed preexposure. We suggest that these differences in strength produce more mediated generalization in the blocked than intermixed preexposure.

The Hall-Rodriguez theory of latent inhibition: Further assessment of compound stimulus preexposure effects.

According to a recent theory (Hall & Rodriguez, 2010), the latent inhibition produced by nonreinforced exposure to a target stimulus (B) will be deepened by subsequent exposure of that stimulus in compound with another (AB). This effect of compound exposure is taken to depend on the addition of a novel A to the familiar B and is not predicted for equivalent preexposure on which AB trials precede the A trials. This prediction was tested in 2 experiments using rats. Experiment 1 used an aversive procedure with flavors as the stimuli; Experiment 2 used an appetitive procedure with visual and auditory stimuli. In both, we found that conditioning with B as the conditioned stimulus proceeded more slowly (i.e., latent inhibition was greater) in subjects given the B-AB sequence in preexposure than in subjects given the AB-B sequence.

An easy-to-hard effect after nonreinforced preexposure in a sweetness discrimination.

Experiments 1A and 1B used a taste-aversion procedure with rats to demonstrate that exposure to easily discriminated flavors along a dimension (1 % and 10 % sucrose) can facilitate learning a subsequent hard discrimination (4 % and 7 % sucrose) when one of those flavors is paired with illness. Experiment 1A compared the effects of preexposure to the easily discriminated flavors against exposure to the same stimuli used in the discrimination training or no exposure at all. Experiment 1B replicated the conditions in Experiment 1A, with 2 additional days of training and unrestricted access to the flavors on CS+/CS- trials in discrimination training. Contrary to findings with multidimensional stimuli (Scahill & Mackintosh, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 96-103, 2004; Suret & McLaren, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 30-42, 2003), we found that preexposure to the easily discriminable stimuli varying along a single dimension of sweetness facilitated subsequent discrimination training over the other conditions in each experiment. We discuss the results in terms of the ideas presented by Gibson (1969) and Mackintosh (Psychological Review, 82, 276-298, 1975) and in terms of hedonic variables not considered by theories of perceptual learning.

Attentional changes in human perceptual learning.

In two experiments, participants were required to identify a target stimulus by means of same/different judgments. Previously, they had received simultaneous or blocked pre-exposures to the target and a similar stimulus. Participants' ability to judge pre-exposed stimuli as different was better after simultaneous than after blocked pre-exposures. However, the benefit of the simultaneous schedule disappeared when, after pre-exposure, the distinctive elements were made common (and some common elements made distinctive) by changing their shape and position within the stimulus (Experiment 1). Similar results were obtained when only one of the aforementioned physical features was modified (Experiment 2). These manipulations did not affect performance when the stimuli had been pre-exposed in separate blocks of trials. These findings support the idea that the effect of simultaneous pre-exposure on stimulus differentiation is based on a selective attention process by which attention is selectively directed towards the distinctive features of the stimuli and away from the common features (Gibson, 1969).

Human perceptual learning: the effect of pre-exposure schedule depends on task demands.

The effects of the pre-exposure schedule (concurrent, intermixed, and blocked) to two similar visual stimuli were assessed in three different tasks. Participants were more accurate identifying one of two pre-exposed stimuli as the target by means of same/different judgments after concurrent than intermixed or blocked pre-exposures. Regardless of pre-exposure schedule, participants were accurate in identifying the same target stimulus in a subsequent multiple choice task. However, the other pre-exposed stimulus was incorrectly chosen as the target in a greater proportion after blocked than intermixed or concurrent pre-exposure. Finally, participants who received the blocked schedule showed a greater ability to construct the target in a puzzle test than those who received a concurrent or intermixed schedule. These results suggest that the effect of pre-exposure schedule may depend on task-specific demands. But all these results might be explained by a selective attention mechanism like that proposed by Gibson (1969) to account for perceptual learning.

Effect of extended training on generalization of latent inhibition: an instance of perceptual learning.

Four experiments examined generalization of latent inhibition (LI) as a function of the length of preexposure in a conditioned taste aversion procedure with rats. Experiment 1 showed that one or four nonreinforced presentations of a flavor compound (BX) retarded subsequent conditioning to another compound (AX). However, after eight presentations of BX, conditioning to AX occurred at the same rate as with no preexposure. These results indicate that generalization of LI decreased as the length of preexposure to BX increased. Experiment 2 replicated this effect of reducing generalization, as well as demonstrating that LI actually increased as the length of preexposure to AX increased. Experiment 3 extended the generality of the effect to a procedure in which both BX and AX were preexposed. Experiment 4 demonstrated a similar reducing-generalization effect when generalization of LI from BX to X was assessed. All of these data are consistent with the notion that prolonged preexposure to BX enhances its discriminability. Different learning mechanisms that might be responsible for this perceptual learning effect are discussed.

The influence of comparison between similar stimuli on the effectiveness of their unique features.

Four groups of rats received stimulus pre-exposure under conditions intended to produce different opportunities for stimulus comparison to occur. Groups AX/BX-L and AX/BX-S received alternating presentations of two compound flavors (AX and BX); the interval between these presentations was long (24 h) for group AX/BX-L, and short (5 min) for group AX/BX-S. Groups AX-L and AX-S matched groups AX/BX-L and AX/BX-S in their pre-exposure conditions except that they received presentations of water rather than presentations of BX. The effective salience of one of the unique stimulus features (A) was then assessed by using this flavor as a conditioned stimulus in a flavor-aversion procedure. It was found that aversion to A was learned about more readily after pre-exposure to AX and BX than after pre-exposure just to AX. However, there was no indication that the rate of conditioning to A was affected by the temporal interval between the presentations of AX and BX. These findings challenge the notion that stimulus comparison engages a process responsible for an increase in the salience of the unique stimulus features, but can be accommodated by the salience modulation mechanism proposed by Hall [Hall, G., 2003. Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: associative and nonassociative mechanisms. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 56, 43-55].

Stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: roles of sensory preconditioning and latent inhibition.

Rats were given exposure to a compound flavour (AX) and to one element of that compound (X). Two drinking tubes were made available to the rat on each exposure trial. For group concurrent (CNC) one tube contained AX and the other X. For groups alternating (ALT) and blocked (BLK), however, both tubes contained the same flavour (AX or X). Group ALT received AX and X on alternate trials; group BLK received AX in the first block of trials and X on the second, or vice versa. After an aversion had been established to X the groups were tested with AX. It was found that group ALT showed less generalization from X to AX than did group BLK. This difference was not accompanied by a parallel difference in the level of conditioning to X. However, group CNC showed both stronger conditioning to X and greater generalization from X to AX than groups ALT and BLK. Implications for the role of stimulus comparison in the perceptual learning effect are discussed.

The contribution of latent inhibition to reduced generalization after pre-exposure to the test stimulus.

Two experiments assessed the contribution of latent inhibition to the generalization-reducing effects of pre-exposure to the test stimulus using a taste aversion procedure in rats. In both experiments, lithium chloride induced illness was paired with a flavor compound (AX) of either salt or sugar (A or B) and hydrochloric acid (X). Generalization of the resulting aversion to a test compound (BX), was assessed after varying pre-exposure to BX, X, and B. Experiment 1 showed that generalization to BX was less when BX itself had been exposed than equivalent pre-exposure to either B and X separately or to B and a new compound (CX). Experiment 2 showed that levels of generalization varied directly as a function of the amount of pre-exposure to BX. The findings show that latent inhibition alone cannot account for the generalization-reducing effect of pre-exposure to BX.

Blocked and test-stimulus exposure effects in perceptual learning re-examined.

Three experiments re-examined the effects of blocked or alternated exposure to the conditioning and test stimuli and the effect of simple exposure to the test stimulus, on stimulus generalization. In all experiments rats received conditioning where a compound flavor, AX, was paired with LiCl-induced illness. All rats were tested for generalization with another flavor, BX. In Experiment 1, rats that received alternating exposure to the two flavor compounds, AX and BX, prior to conditioning showed less generalization to BX than rats that received no exposure. Exposure to BX or AX alone was also somewhat effective in reducing generalization. In Experiment 2 blocked exposure to AX and BX prior to conditioning was effective in reducing generalization, as was alternated exposure, and extended exposure to BX was more effective than the other procedures. In Experiment 3, exposure to X alone prior to conditioning produced generalization equal to that produced by alternated or blocked exposure and replicated the effect of extended exposure to BX found in the previous experiment. The relevance of the results to the theories proposed by McLaren and Macintosh [Anim. Learn. Behav. 28 (2000) 211] and Hall [Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 56 (2003) 43] is discussed.

Stimulus preexposure reduces generalization of conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non-alcohol flavors in infant rats.

Results of 3 experiments showed that infant rats (age 13-17 days) generalize conditioned taste aversions between alcohol and non-alcohol tastes such as a mixture of sucrose and quinine, apple cider vinegar, or coffee. Nonreinforced preexposure to those tastes reduced generalized aversions between them. Generalization between alcohol and sucrose-quinine was reduced not only after preexposure to both tastes, but also when only the nonconditioned taste was preexposed, whereas with alcohol and vinegar, both tastes had to be preexposed to obtain that effect. In no case was generalization reduced when only the to-be-conditioned taste was preexposed. Previous experience with alcohol alone, as well as with similar gustatory stimuli, may enhance subjects' ability to differentiate them during infantile stages in rats.

Latent inhibition as a function of CS intensity in taste aversion learning.

An experiment is reported in which the relationship between the intensity of a preexposed stimulus and latent inhibition was investigated, using the taste aversion learning paradigm in rats. Two concentrations of a saline solution (high, 1%; and low, 0.25%) were used during preexposure and conditioning phases in a factorial design. Two control conditions without preexposure were added, one for each stimulus concentration during conditioning. The known effect of conditioned stimulus (CS) intensity during conditioning was confirmed: the more concentrated the solution used in conditioning, the higher the acquisition rate. A direct relationship was observed between the CS intensity used during preexposure and the latent inhibition effect: the more concentrated the solution during preexposure, the lower the acquisition rate of conditioning. The implications of these results for latent inhibition theories are considered.