Saudi Urological Association consensus guidelines on the use of robotic surgery in urology.

Over the past three decades, minimally invasive robotic technology has evolved substantially in urological practice, replacing many open procedures and becoming part of routine clinical practice. The Health Sector Transformation Program for the Kingdom's Vision 2030 aims to restructure the health sector and optimize its status and prospects as an effective and integrated ecosystem centered on the patient's health. Therefore, this consensus seeks to endorse the clinical practice guidelines for robotic surgery (RS) in the KSA, highlighting its effectiveness, safety, and favorable outcomes compared to open and laparoscopic surgeries in certain procedures when used by trained surgeons in well-structured RS programs.

Surgical and oncological outcome after laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. A single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: We determined the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in comparison to open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and factors predicting bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared the data of patients who underwent ONU or LNU for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma from 2000 to 2016. The primary endpoint was to determine bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). The data were analysed using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: Total of 50 patients, of which 24 had LNU and 26 had ONU, met the inclusion criteria. Median durations of follow-up were 4.2 and 6.5 years (p=0.1070) in LNU and ONU, respectively. Operative time, blood loss and hospital stay were significantly lower in the LNU group than in the ONU group (p=0.0001, p=0.0001, p=0.0018). Cancer-specific survival rate in the LNU was 75% and ONU was 73.3% (p=0.1902), whereas BCRFS and CSS were not significantly different in both groups (log-rank test; BCRFS: p=0.809 and CSS: p=0.802). Patients who underwent ureteroscopy with biopsy (p=0.001), had multifocality (p=0.001) and previous history of (H/O) bladder cancer (p=0.020) were at significant risk for developing bladder cancer recurrence after nephroureterectomy.  Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy can benefit patients because of its minimal invasiveness, and oncologic outcomes are comparable to ONU. Preoperative ureteroscopy with biopsy, multifocality and previous H/O bladder cancer might be risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence.

Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy. A report of the first 101 cases from a single center in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To report robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) outcomes from a single tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of patients undergoing RPN at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of  Saudi Arabia, between January 2008 and January 2018. The study reports patient's demographics, tumor characteristics, operative details, and perioperative outcomes, using descriptive statistics of median and range values. Results: One hundred and one patients underwent RPN during the study period. Average tumor size was 3 (1.3-6.4) cm and average radius exophytic nearness anterior/posterior location (RENAL) score was 6 (4-10). Perioperative parameters were blood loss 200 (5-1500) ml and warm ischemia time 17 (8-40) minutes, excluding off-clamp surgery in 12 (11.9%); operative time was 166 (66-381) minutes. Conversion to open partial nephrectomy occurred in 9 (8.9%) patients, major complications in 3 (3%) patients, positive surgical margins in 5 (5%) patients, and the hospital stay was 4 (2-14) days. A total of 73 (73%) patients achieved a trifecta of freedom from any complication, negative surgical margins, and ischemia time ≤25 minutes. Study limitations included the retrospective design and small cohort size. Conclusions: The initial experience of robotic partial nephrectomy was associated with a surgical outcome comparable to that reported by higher-volume centers.

Fracture risk following bilateral orchiectomy.

PURPOSE: Bone loss has been reported in patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. We assess fracture risk following bilateral orchiectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through the Rochester Epidemiology Project we identified 429 Olmsted County, Minnesota men who underwent bilateral orchiectomy in 1956 to 2000, almost all for prostate cancer. Fractures were ascertained from comprehensive medical records and compared with expected numbers based on local incidence rates (standardized incidence ratio, SIR). Potential risk factors were assessed with proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During 1961 person-years of followup 161 men experienced 267 fractures, for a cumulative incidence after 15 years of 40% compared to 19% expected (p <0.001). However, 42 were pathological fractures and 82 were found incidentally on radiological surveys for metastasis. Overall fracture risk was increased (SIR 3.42, 95% CI 2.91-3.99) but was reduced by excluding the pathological and incidental fractures (SIR 2.04, 95% CI 1.66-2.47). The increase was largely accounted for by the moderate trauma fractures of the hip, spine and distal forearm traditionally linked with osteoporosis (SIR 3.50, 95% CI 2.71-4.43). In multivariate analyses risk factors for fractures generally included patient age, inactivity, prior radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis, chemotherapy and use of nonsteroidal antiandrogens, while independent risk factors for the traditional osteoporotic fractures included age, inactivity and diagnosis of osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures are common in men with prostate cancer due to advanced age, occurrence of pathological fractures and enhanced skeletal surveillance but there remains a significant increase in osteoporotic fracture risk following bilateral orchiectomy.