RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The mental health impact on relatives of cancer patients frequently goes unnoticed and is commonly undervalued. This study aimed to explore how personal factors such as the patient's degree of kin, marital status, cancer stage, and number of diagnosed family members are correlated with the severity of depression and anxiety among relatives of cancer patients. METHOD: This self-administered cross-sectional survey was conducted in Kuwait, employing a random sampling method to recruit participants. Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the validated Arabic versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. RESULTS: The mean age of the relatives of the cancer patients was 38.36 years (±13.44), with a female majority (59.72%). The prevalence of depression in the examined population was 60.1%, with the majority having mild depression (39.3%). On the other hand, the prevalence of anxiety in the same group was 51.2%, with the majority having mild disease (27.5%). Being female and having a cancer patient relative in the metastasis stage put patients' relatives at a greater risk of depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of cancer necessitates mental health screenings for patients' relatives, as findings from our study indicate that these individuals are at a high risk of developing depression and anxiety. Targeted support and referrals to specialists are crucial for mitigating the impact on their well-being.
RESUMO
Despite significant pharmacological advancements, hypertension management remains challenging, with varying quality of primary care. Digital tools and other non-pharmacological interventions hold promise in addressing this challenge. Consequently, a thorough examination of these interventions is recommended. This meta-analysis focuses on clinician-oriented strategies aimed at improving hypertension management, to assess the most effective approaches for improving antihypertensive prescribing and blood pressure control for secondary prevention. This was done through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials published in PubMed and Embase since the beginning of 2010 that aimed to enhance antihypertensive medication prescription in primary care settings for hypertensive patients with secondary complications while reporting changes in blood pressure or target achievement. We screened 6305 records. Four studies met the inclusion criteria, with reported interventions including physician education and the implementation of electronic decision support systems. All studies showed that the control group had a statistically significant lower systolic blood pressure, but the effect on diastolic blood pressure was not statistically significant. The overall mean difference was 2.12 mmHg (95% CI = 0.98; 3.26, P-value = 0.0003) for systolic blood pressure in favor of the control group and 1.22 mmHg (95% CI = -0.48; 3.26, P-value = 0.16) for diastolic blood pressure, which was not statistically significant. Despite considerable efforts to control hypertension, it remains a significant obstacle to optimal cardiovascular risk reduction. This review is also limited by a scarcity of studies.
