Anticoagulants versus Antiplatelet Treatment in the Medical Management of Carotid Floating Thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Carotid free-floating thrombus (CFT) is a rare cause of stroke describing an intraluminal thrombus that is loosely associated with the arterial wall and manifesting as a filling defect fully surrounded by flow on vascular imaging. Unfortunately, there is no clear consensus among experts on the ideal treatment for this pathology. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients diagnosed with CFT on computed tomography angiogram (CTA) between January 2015-March 2023. We aimed to compare two treatment regimens: anticoagulation (ACT) and antiplatelet (APT) in the treatment of CFT. APT regimens included the use of dual or single antiplatelets (DAPT or SAPT; aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor) and ACT regimens included the use of direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin, heparin or low molecular weight heparin +/- ASA. Patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy were excluded. RESULTS: During study time there were 8252 acute ischemic stroke hospitalizations, of which 135 (1.63 %) patients were diagnosed with CFT. Sixty-six patients were included in our analysis. Patients assigned to APT were older (60.41years ± 12.82;p < 0.01). Other demographic variables were similar between ACT and APT groups. Complete CFT resolution on repeat vascular imaging was numerically higher at 30 days (58.8 vs 31.6 %, respectively; p = 0.1) and at latest follow-up (70.8 vs 50 %; p = 0.1) on ACT vs APT, respectively without reaching statistical significance. Similarly, there was numerically higher rates of any ICH with ACT compared to APT but it did not achieve statistical significance (27.6 % vs 13.5 %; p = 0.5). There were similar rates of PH1/2 hemorrhagic transformation, independence at discharge and similar hospital length of stay between ACT and APT groups. Patients assigned to APT were more likely to be discharged on their assigned treatment compared to those assigned to ACT (86.5 vs 55.2 %; p < 0.001). The rate of 30-day recurrent stroke was comparable among ACT and APT at 30 days (3.4 vs 0 %; p = 0.1, respectively). Subgroup analysis comparing exclusive ACT vs Dual APT lead to similar results. CONCLUSION: Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety outcomes in CFT patients who were exclusively managed medically with ACT vs APT. Larger prospective studies are needed.

Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale Implementation of an Urban County Severity-Based Stroke Triage Protocol: Impact and Outcomes on a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Screening scales are recommended to assist field-based triage of acute stroke patients to designated stroke centers. Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale (CPSS) is a commonly used prehospital stroke screening tool and has been validated to identify large vessel occlusion (LVO). This study addresses the impact of county-based CPSS implementation to triage suspected LVO patients to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dekalb County in Atlanta, Georgia, implemented CPSS-based protocol with score of 3 and last seen normal time < 24 h mandating transfer to the nearest CSC if the added bypass time was <15 min. Frequency of stroke codes, LVO, IV-tPA use, and thrombectomy treatment were compared six months before and after protocol change (November 1, 2020). RESULTS: During the study period, 907 stroke patients presented to the CSC by EMS, including 289 (32%) with CPSS score 3. There was an increase in monthly ischemic stroke volume (pre-16 ± 2 vs.19 ± 3 p = 0.03), LVO (pre-4.3 ± 1.7 vs. post-7.0 ± 2.4; p = 0.03), EVT (pre-15% vs. post-30%; p = 0.001), without significant increase in stroke mimic volume or delay in mean time from last seen normal to IV-tPA (pre-165 ± 66, post-158 ± 49 min; p = 0.35). CPSS score 3 was associated with increased likelihood of LVO diagnosis (OR 8.5, 95% CI 5.0-14.4; p = 0.001) and decreased the likelihood of stroke mimics (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: CPSS is a quick, easy to implement, and reliable prehospital severity scale for EMS to triage LVO to CSC without delaying IV-tPA treatment or significantly increasing stroke mimics.

Cause-Specific Mortality as a Sequalae of Perioperative Stroke Following Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding cause-specific mortality following a perioperative stroke. In this study, we aim to establish the risk of cause-specific mortality associated with perioperative stroke following cardiac and vascular procedures at 30 days, 90 days, and 1-year postoperative. It is hoped that this fund of knowledge will enhance perioperative risk stratification and medical management for patients who have suffered a perioperative stroke. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating 277,654 cardiac and vascular surgical patients dually documented within the Inpatient Discharge Claims Database and the Pennsylvania Department of Health Death Statistics database. A univariate assessment followed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds of cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, malignancy, infectious, and dementia causes of mortality following perioperative stroke. RESULTS: Perioperative stroke significantly increased the odds of overall mortality (P<0.0001) as well as cause-specific mortality in all categories (P<0.05) except dementia (P=0.8907) at all-time endpoints. Cerebrovascular-related mortality was most impacted by perioperative stroke [adjusted odds ratio: 34.5 (29.1, 40.9), P<0.0001 at 30 d]. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative stroke in the cardiac and vascular surgical population is associated with increased odds of overall, cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, malignancy, and infectious causes of mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1-year postoperatively when compared with patients who did not experience a perioperative stroke.

Acute Amnestic Syndrome and Ischemic Stroke: A Case Series.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stroke is an uncommon cause of amnesia. We describe in detail 3 cases of anterograde amnesia and confabulation secondary to acute ischemic stroke and review the available literature. RECENT FINDINGS: In our case series, all 3 patients presented with anterograde amnesia and 2 of 3 copresented with prominent confabulation. These symptoms were recognized in delayed fashion, and no patients received IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). Although stroke infarct topology was variable, all 3 patients had infarction of the fornix. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 2 of 3 patients: both had persistent memory impairment and were no longer functionally independent. SUMMARY: Acute onset anterograde amnesia and confabulation may uncommonly represent acute ischemic stroke. Delays in this diagnosis typically exclude patients from emergent stroke treatment or timely diagnostic stroke evaluation. Clinicians should maintain a high degree of suspicion for ischemic stroke in this setting, especially in patients with comorbid vascular risk factors. Memory impairment secondary to ischemic stroke can produce considerable long-term disability.

Neurological involvement of coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, unexplained cases of pneumonia emerged in Wuhan, China, which were found to be secondary to the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-2019) outbreak, a pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection including the potential mechanisms and therapeutic options. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search from December 01, 2019 to May 14, 2020 using multiple combinations of keywords from PubMed and Ovid Medline databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included articles with cases of COVID-19 where neurological involvement was evident. RESULTS: We were able to identify 82 cases of COVID-19 with neurological complications. The mean age was 62.3 years. 37.8% of the patients were women (n = 31). 48.8% of the patients (n = 40) had cerebrovascular insults, 28% (n = 23) had neuromuscular disorders, and 23% of the patients (n = 19) had encephalitis or encephalopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 are not rare, especially large vessel stroke, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and meningoencephalitis. Moving forward, further studies are needed to clarify the prevalence of the neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, investigate their biological backgrounds, and test treatment options. Physicians should be cautious not to overlook other neurological diagnoses that can mimic COVID-19 during the pandemic.