RESUMO
Background: Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG), is caused by narrowing the iridocorneal angle and increases the risk of blockage in the trabecular meshwork. Phacoemulsification and laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) effectively control IOP elevation and widen the angle. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared Phacoemulsification and LPI Effectiveness for PACG. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared Phacoemulsification and LPI for individuals with PACG. We sought to evaluate the following outcomes: mean IOP, number of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual field (VF) progression, peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), Shaffer gonioscopy grading, central corneal thickness (CCT), central endothelial cell density (CECD), and poor response to surgery. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to represent continuous outcomes, while the risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. Results: 5 RCTs that enrolled 917 participants were deemed eligible. The phacoemulsification group showed statistically significance lower mean CCT and CECD and lower risk of poor response to surgery compared to LPI (SMD = -1.10; 95% -1.50, -0.70; P<0.001, SMD -366.12; 95% -652.59, -79.65; P=0.01, and RR 0.35; 95% 0.23, 0.54; P<0.001 respectively). There were no significant improvement in IOP and number of medications between both groups (SMD = -0.74; 95% CI = -2.26, 0.78; P=0.34, and SMD -17.58; 95% CI = -50.28, 15.12; P=0.29 respectively). Finally, there were also no significant differences in VA, VF progression, PAS, and mean Shaffer gonioscopy grading between both groups. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification showed statistically significant lower mean corneal thickness, central endothelial cell density, and lower risk of poor response to surgery compared to LPI. However, there were no significant differences in mean IOP, number of medications, VA, VF progression, PAS, and mean Shaffer gonioscopy grading between Phacoemulsification and LPI.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the detailed ophthalmic findings in a young patient with genetically confirmed arterial tortuosity syndrome (ATS) and the findings in 8 family members who were carriers. METHODS: Nine members of the same Saudi family were assessed at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for ATS-related ocular changes after homozygosity for the pathogenic variant of SLC2A10 gene was confirmed in 1 member. All family members underwent complete ophthalmic examination, genetic testing, and corneal tomography at presentation and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: All ophthalmic features were manifested in our patient with ATS including schisis-like splitting of the stromal layer with greater peripheral thinning, pannus, deep posterior stromal opacities, myopia, high astigmatism, and keratoglobus. The ocular phenotype was also expressed in some carriers ranging from mild myopia to the full spectrum of corneal abnormalities associated with ATS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided further insights into the phenotype in both patients with ATS and carriers. Annual ophthalmic examination is warranted in both types of patients and must undergo from early life onward to detect progressive ectasia which may necessitate corneal crosslinking.
