Developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy with spike-and-wave activation in sleep in Saudi Arabia: Electroclinical, etiologic, genetic, and outcome multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical features of developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy with spike-and-wave activation in sleep (D/EE-SWAS), its electrographic characteristics, and etiology and to compare the effects of different treatment strategies on the outcomes using a Saudi Arabian database. METHODS: This multicenter study included children with D/EE-SWAS who were evaluated between 2010 and 2020 at 11 tertiary centers. Data were collected on their baseline clinical features, etiologies, and treatment modalities. Seizure reduction, spike-wave index, and cognitive state were examined as potential therapeutic outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-one children were diagnosed with D/EE-SWAS, with a median age of 7 years (IQR: 3-5) and an almost equal sex distribution. The average age at which epilepsy was diagnosed was 3 years (IQR: 5-2). A genetic/metabolic etiology was found in 35.1% of the patients, and a structural etiology was found in 27.4%. Children with underlying genetic/metabolic diseases exhibited an earlier seizure onset (P = 0.001) than children with other etiologies. Benzodiazepines (76.6%) were the most common treatment, followed by steroids (51.9%). Sodium valproate (75%) was the most frequently used antiseizure medication, followed by levetiracetam (64.9%). Children with a later seizure onset were more likely to have better clinical responses (P = 0.046), EEG responses (P = 0.012), and cognitive outcomes (P = 0.006) than children with an earlier onset. Moreover, better seizure response and electrographic response were seen in patients with bilateral interictal discharges on the EEG than otherwise. Children had a higher likelihood of both clinical and electrographic improvement with combination therapy of benzodiazepines (P = 0.001) and steroids (P = 0.001) than with other therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows a higher prevalence of genetic/metabolic causes and suggests the superior efficacy of combination therapy with steroids and benzodiazepines in D/EE-SWAS. Prospective studies that strictly assess the treatment protocols and outcomes are needed.

Beyond the caudate nucleus: Early atypical neuroimaging findings in biotin-thiamine- responsive basal ganglia disease.

BACKGROUND: Biotin-thiamine-responsive basal ganglia disease (BTBGD) is a treatable neurometabolic disease caused by variants in SLC19A3. Typical imaging features include symmetrical involvement of the caudate nuclei and putamina. OBJECTIVE: The study sought to explore classical BTBGD without caudate nucleus involvement, to highlight the importance of recognizing this new pattern early in the disease. METHODS: Individuals with genetically confirmed BTBGD who harbored the same homozygous variant: NM_025243.4 (SLC19A3): c.1264A > G (p.Thr422Ala) and had atypical neuroimaging were recruited. RESULTS: Nine patients with BTBGD had atypical neuroimaging findings on the first MRI scan. The median age at symptom onset was 3 years. All patients presented with classical clinical features of subacute encephalopathy, dystonia, ataxia, and seizures. During the acute crisis, MRI revealed bilateral and symmetric involvement of the putamina in all patients; one showed small caudate nuclei involvement. In addition, the thalami, cerebellum, and brain stem were involved in six patients, seven patients, and three patients, respectively. Treatment included a combination of high doses of thiamine and biotin. One patient died; he did not receive any vitamin supplementation. Two patients who were treated late had severe neurological sequelae, including generalized dystonia and quadriplegia. Six patients treated early had good outcomes with minimal sequelae, including mild dystonia and dysarthria. Two patients showed the classical chronic atrophic and necrotic changes already described. CONCLUSION: The early atypical neuroimaging pattern of BTBGD described here, particularly the lack of caudate nucleus involvement, should not dissuade the clinician and radiologist from considering a diagnosis of BTBGD.