RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To guarantee the delivery of thorough and scientifically supported menopausal care, it is imperative to allocate resources towards ongoing education and training for physicians. Therefore, it is essential to assess the attitudes, practices, and obstacles faced by physicians in Saudi Arabia when it comes to menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT). METHOD: An online survey was conducted from June to September 2023 to investigate the attitudes, practices, and barriers of physicians in Saudi Arabia, regarding menopausal HRT. The study population consisted of practicing physicians in Saudi Arabia specializing in gynecology, endocrinology, family medicine, internal medicine, and general practice at various levels, including consultants, senior registrars, and residents. The survey link was distributed to the intended research participants in Saudi Arabia using several social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, WhatsApp, and Instagram) utilizing a Google Form hyperlink. RESULTS: A total of 95 physicians participated in this study. A total of 60.0% of the study participants agreed that in general, HRT should be offered to menopausal women who have menopausal symptoms. Besides, around 24.2% of them agreed that in general, HRT should be offered to menopausal women who do not have menopausal symptoms. The most commonly reported methods of obtaining up-to-date information about HRT were Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia publication and journal articles, contributing 36.8% (n=35) and 24.2% (n=23), respectively. The most commonly reported type of systemic (i.e. non-vaginal) HRT for women with premature menopause (menopause <40 years) without contraindications was combined oral contraceptive pill accounting for 33.7% (n=32). More than half of the study participants (53.6%; n=51) reported experiencing difficulty or barriers related to prescribing HRT. The most commonly reported difficulties and barriers related to HRT prescribing were consumer preferences for complementary/alternative therapies, difficulty explaining HRT risks and benefits to women, and lack of suitable HRT products accounting for 27.4% (n=26), 21.1% (n=20), and 16.8% (n=16), respectively. CONCLUSION: The nuanced perspectives of Saudi Arabian physicians regarding HRT for postmenopausal women are revealed in this study. Electronic published societal guidelines and Ministry of Health publications are examples of vital information resources that physicians must have access to. Difficulties associated with the prescription of HRT, including product shortages and consumer preferences, underscore the criticality of confronting obstacles in clinical practice. Additional investigation is suggested in order to enhance physicians' knowledge and implementation of guidelines, specifically for patient cohorts whose medical histories are unique.
RESUMO
Background The presence of critical illness-induced corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) is correlated with elevated concentrations of circulating biomarkers associated with inflammation and coagulation in multiple domains. The management of adrenal insufficiency remains a topic of ongoing debate and disagreement among endocrinologists and intensivists. This study aimed to assess the extent of understanding regarding CIRCI among endocrinologists and intensivists who are actively practicing in Saudi Arabia. Methods This is an online cross-sectional survey study that was conducted between June and August 2023 to assess knowledge of CIRCI among endocrinologists and intensivists working in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire tool for this study was constructed based on a previous literature review. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to define factors that affect participants' knowledge of CIRCI. Results A total of 76 physicians were involved in this study. Around 32.9% (n= 25) of the participants described CIRCI correctly as an impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis during critical illness. Around 35.5% (n=27) of the participants identified that widespread use of corticosteroids in critically ill patients prompted the need to revisit the concept, diagnosis, and management of CIRCI, and a similar proportion of the participants (35.5%) (n=27) identified that the role of corticosteroids in the management of CIRCI in critically ill patients may be beneficial in selected cases. Around 42.1% (n=32) of the participants identified that CIRCI is specific to critically ill patients while AI can occur in any individual. Around 17.1% (n=13) of the participants confirmed that there is no task force agreement on whether corticosteroids should be used in adult patients with sepsis but without shock. The mean knowledge score of the study participants was 3.6 (sd: 2.2) out of 10, which demonstrates a weak level of knowledge of CIRCI (36.0%). Binary logistic regression analysis identified that physicians from the southern and western regions were less likely to be knowledgeable of CIRCI compared to physicians from the central region (p< 0.05). Conclusion The study revealed that the level of familiarity with CIRCI among endocrinologists and intensivists in Saudi Arabia fell short of the desired benchmark. Clinicians may opt to utilize delta cortisol levels following cosyntropin administration and random plasma cortisol levels as diagnostic measures for CIRCI, instead of relying on plasma-free cortisol or salivary cortisol levels in conjunction with plasma total cortisol. Adherence to customized treatment protocols is crucial to attain the most favorable results for patients.