RESUMO
Introduction Vulvoplasty, or female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS), refers to any surgical alteration of the vaginal or labial anatomy for aesthetic or medical reasons. It aims to restore or enhance the female genitals and can involve multiple procedures such as labiaplasty, clitoral unhooding, monsplasty, vaginoplasty, hymenoplasty, G-spot augmentation, frenuloplasty, perineoplasty, fat injections, or a combination of these. Labiaplasty is currently the most popular procedure among patients. Since the public is exploring FGCS benefits in the media, it can be foreseen that it will soon gain popularity among the population of Saudi Arabia. As a result, the purpose of this study is to assess women's attitudes and knowledge towards genital cosmetic surgeries in Saudi Arabia. Methods This correlational cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia among women aged 18 years and above, using an online self-structured questionnaire distributed from April 2023 to October 2023. The sample size of 594 respondents was determined based on a minimum requirement of 500 participants, with a confidence level of 95% and a study power of 95%. A convenient sampling method was employed to select participants, and data collection was carried out through a self-administered online questionnaire distributed via various social media platforms. The survey was self-structured, and Cronbach's alpha values for all sections were greater than 0.7. These sections include demographic characteristics, sexual life and obstetric history, and women's knowledge, practices, and attitudes toward FGCS. Descriptive analysis, chi-square test, and t-test were used for data analysis using SPSS software. Results A total of 589 eligible women were included in the study; 284 (48.2%) were from the central region, and ages ranged from 18 to 65 years, with a mean age of 33.5 years. A total of 401 (68.1%) were married, 366 (62.1%) had a bachelor degree. Two hundred and ninety-one (49.4%) participants heard about FGCS, 165 (28%) knew that it involves surgical procedures to change the appearance of the female genitalia, 144 (24.4%) said it is also known as vaginal rejuvenation or designer vagina surgery and 200 (34%) knew it can involve procedures such as labiaplasty, clitoral hood reduction, or vaginal tightening, while 190 (32.3%) reported it is sometimes done for aesthetic reasons but may also be done for medical reasons. Only 45 (7.6%) had undergone FGCS, but 112 (19%) confirmed they consider undergoing FGCS for themselves. Four hundred and ninety-eight (84.6%) participants thought that it's important to have access to support services, such as counseling or peer support, 471 (80%) expressed that it's important that healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia are knowledgeable about FGCS, 425 (72.2%) were concerned about the potential risks and complications of FGCS. Conclusion In conclusion, the current study revealed that nearly one out of five women were knowledgeable about FGCS, mainly about the nature and types of the procedure. Higher knowledge levels about FGCS were associated with younger age, higher educational levels, and women who were more likely to consider undergoing FGCS in the future.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a highly prevalent comorbidity in patients with diabetes, with rates estimated between 13% and 47% across studies. Iron deficiency anemia may potentially influence hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, which are routinely measured to monitor long-term glycemic control in diabetes. Some evidence suggests that HbA1c may be lower in diabetics with IDA due to increased red blood cell turnover. However, current evidence elucidating the effects of IDA on HbA1c and diabetes outcomes remains inconsistent and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the relationship between IDA, HbA1c levels, and glycemic dynamics in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The study sample included 143 adult patients diagnosed with diabetes, recruited from outpatient clinics in Saudi Arabia. Iron deficiency anemia was identified through serum ferritin <100 ng/mL, transferrin saturation <20%, and hematologic parameters. The HbA1c levels were measured using standardized laboratory methods. Daily glucose profiles were obtained by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a subset of patients to assess glycemic dynamics. RESULTS: The prevalence of IDA was 39.9% among the diabetic cohort. Patients with IDA had a numerically higher mean HbA1c of 7.2% compared to 6.8% in non-anemic diabetics, suggesting a potential effect of IDA on HbA1c. Those with IDA also spent more time in hyperglycemic ranges, along with greater glucose variability based on CGM data. Iron deficiency measures, including low ferritin and high red cell distribution width (RDW), showed weak positive correlations with HbA1c levels. CONCLUSION: Iron deficiency anemia is highly prevalent among Saudi diabetic patients and is potentially associated with inaccurate HbA1c values and poor short-term glycemic control. However, larger controlled studies are warranted to conclusively investigate mechanisms linking IDA to alterations in HbA1c and glycemic dynamics. Optimized screening and treatment of IDA may lead to more accurate diabetes monitoring and improved outcomes.