Carboxylated nanodiamonds are neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic on liver, kidney, intestine and lung human cell lines.

Although nanodiamonds (NDs) appear as one of the most promising nanocarbon materials available so far for biomedical applications, their risk for human health remains unknown. Our work was aimed at defining the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of two sets of commercial carboxylated NDs with diameters below 20 and 100 nm, on six human cell lines chosen as representative of potential target organs: HepG2 and Hep3B (liver), Caki-1 and Hek-293 (kidney), HT29 (intestine) and A549 (lung). Cytotoxicity of NDs was assessed by measuring cell impedance (xCELLigence® system) and cell survival/death by flow cytometry while genotoxicity was assessed by γ-H2Ax foci detection, which is considered the most sensitive technique for studying DNA double-strand breaks. To validate and check the sensitivity of the techniques, aminated polystyrene nanobeads were used as positive control in all assays. Cell incorporation of NDs was also studied by flow cytometry and luminescent N-V center photoluminescence (confirmed by Raman microscopy), to ensure that nanoparticles entered the cells. Overall, we show that NDs effectively entered the cells but NDs do not induce any significant cytotoxic or genotoxic effects on the six cell lines up to an exposure dose of 250 µg/mL. Taken together these results strongly support the huge potential of NDs for human nanomedicine but also their potential as negative control in nanotoxicology studies.

CD24(-/low) stem-like breast cancer marker defines the radiation-resistant cells involved in memorization and transmission of radiation-induced genomic instability.

A growing body of evidence attributes properties of chemo- and/or radiation-resistance to cancer stem cells (CSCs). Moreover, non-targeted delayed effects such as genomic instability, transmitted through many generations, can be observed in the progeny of surviving irradiated cells. As a consequence, we propose that radiation-resistance properties associated to CSCs could confer a key role to this subpopulation in the transmission of genomic instability. To test this hypothesis, we searched the CSC markers associated to radiation-resistance in breast cancer cell lines and studied the role of the resistant cells in the transmission of genomic instability. First, we show that irradiation induces a 2-4 weeks period of intense cell death leading to the emergence of chromosomal unstable cells during more than 35 population doublings. Then, among seven breast CSC markers, we identify CD24(-/low) labelling as a marker of radiation-resistance. We demonstrate that CD24(+) progeny of irradiated cells exclusively descends from CD24(-/low) cells. Finally, we show that delayed chromosomal instability is only expressed by CD24(+) cells, but is transmitted by stable surviving CD24(-/low) cells. So, for the first time a CSC marker, CD24, is associated with the transmission of genomic instability. This work may assign a new deleterious role to breast CSCs in aggressive recurrence after radiotherapy, as the transmitted genomic instability potentially leads tumour cells to acquire more aggressive characteristics.