Long-term effects of the Forsus Device in Class II division I patients treated at pre-peak, peak, and post-peak growth periods: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) for the correction of Class II division 1 malocclusion during pre-peak, peak, and post-peak growth periods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 60 patients that received FFRD with concurrent full-fixed orthodontic appliances during pre-peak (n=18), peak (n=21) and post-peak (n=21) maturational stages. The FFRD groups were compared with 60 untreated Class II control subjects obtained from the University of Michigan growth study and matched by skeletal age, sex, and observation periods. Lateral cephalograms were obtained at three time-points: [T1] pre-treatment; [T2] end of comprehensive orthodontic treatment; and [T3] retention (average of 3 years in retention). Nineteen linear and angular measurements were recorded. Short-term (T1- T2) and long-term (T1-T3) treatment changes were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. RESULTS: In the pre-peak group, FFRD caused temporary restraint of maxillary growth and an increase in mandibular length at T1-T2 compared to controls. No significant differences were found at T2-T3 time points. The net changes (T1-T3) included a restraining effect on the maxilla and dentoalveolar compensation. In the peak group, maxillary restraint effect was seen at T1-T2, but this effect relapsed at T2-T3 time points. Similar to the pre-peak group, the net results (T1-T3) included maxillary headgear effect and dentoalveolar compensation. In the post-peak group, the net effects (T1-T3) of treatment included only dentoalveolar compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, Class II malocclusion correction with FFRD is stable at three years post-treatment and is mainly achieved by maxillary restraint and dentoalveolar compensation at the pre-peak and peak stages and dentoalveolar compensation during the post-peak stage.

Analysis of Class II patients, successfully treated with the straight-wire and Forsus appliances, based on cervical vertebral maturation status.

OBJECTIVE: To assess skeletal and dental changes in patients successfully treated with the Forsus appliance based on cervical vertebral maturation status. METHODS: Forty-seven Class II patients, successfully treated with the Forsus appliance, were divided into peak and postpeak growth groups determined immediately prior to Forsus placement. The mean (SD) ages of the peak and postpeak groups were 13.4 (1.0) and 14.1 (1.3) years, respectively. Superimpositions of initial, Forsus placement, Forsus removal, and final cephalometric radiographs were completed, allowing the measurement of changes during three treatment phases. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups during treatment phase 1 (alignment/leveling), with both groups demonstrating a worsening of the Class II molar relationship. However, during treatment phase 2 (Class II correction), patients within the peak group demonstrated significantly higher mean apical base, mandibular and molar changes, and an increased rate of change compared with those in the postpeak group. No significant differences were observed during treatment phase 3 (detail/finishing). CONCLUSIONS: Following an initial worsening of the Class II molar relationship as a result of straight-wire appliance effects, Forsus appliance treatment initiated during cervical vertebral maturation status (CS) 3-4 elicits more effective and efficient correction of Class II molar relationships than when initiated during CS 5-6. Data support that these effects are due mainly to maxillary skeletal and dentoalveolar restraint during a period of more rapid mandibular growth.

Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device (Forsus) during comprehensive correction of Class II malocclusion in growing patients. METHODS: Fifty-four patients (mean age, 12.5 ± 1.2 years) with Class II division 1 malocclusion were consecutively treated with fixed app-liances in combination with Forsus. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the beginning of the fixed treatment (T1), Forsus insertion (T2), its removal (T3), and end of the comprehensive therapy (T4). Statistical comparisons were carried out by repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The overall therapeutic effects were mainly dentoalveolar and occurred mostly during the active treatment with Forsus (T2-T3, mean duration = 0.5 ± 0.1 years). The overjet and overbite decreased significantly (-3.5 and -1.5 mm, respectively) and the molar relationship improved by 4.3 mm. These changes were associated with significant retroclination of the maxillary incisors (-3.1°), proclination and intrusion of the mandibular incisors (+5.0° and -1.5 mm, respectively), and mesialization of the mandibular molars (+2.0 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Forsus had mainly dentoalveolar effects and contributed largely to the overall therapeutic outcome.

Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment and posttreatment dentoskeletal effects induced by the Forsus device (FRD) in growing patients with Class II malocclusion in a retrospective controlled clinical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six Class II patients (mean [SD] age 12.3 [1.2] years) were treated consecutively with the FRD protocol and compared with a sample of 20 subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion (mean [SD] age 12.2 [0.9] years). Lateral cephalograms were taken at the beginning of treatment, at the end of comprehensive treatment (after 2.3 ± 0.4 years), and at a postretention period (after 2.3 ± 1.1 years from the end of comprehensive treatment). Statistical comparisons were carried out with the unpaired t-test and Benjamini-Hochberg correction (P < .05). RESULTS: After comprehensive treatment, the FRD sample showed a significant restriction of the sagittal maxillary growth together with a significant correction in overjet, overbite, and molar relationship. During the overall observation interval, the FRD group exhibited no significant sagittal or vertical skeletal changes, while significant improvements were recorded in overjet (-3.8 mm), overbite (-1.5 mm), and molar relationship (+3.7 mm). CONCLUSION: The FRD protocol was effective in correcting Class II malocclusion mainly at the dentoalveolar level when evaluated 2 years after the end of comprehensive treatment.

Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dental, skeletal, and soft tissue effects of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment combined with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FRD) in Class II patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Class II patients (mean age 12.7 ± 1.2 years) were treated consecutively with the FRD protocol and compared with a matched sample of 27 untreated Class II subjects (mean age 12.8 ± 1.3 years). Lateral cephalograms were taken before therapy and at the completion of comprehensive therapy. The mean duration of comprehensive treatment was 2.4 ± 0.4 years. Statistical comparisons were carried out with the Student's t-test (P < .05). RESULTS: The success rate was 87.5%. The FRD group showed a significant restraint in the sagittal skeletal position of the maxilla (also at the soft tissue level), a significant increase in mandibular length, and a significant improvement in maxillo-mandibular sagittal skeletal relationships. The treated group exhibited a significant reduction in overjet and a significant increase in molar relationship. The lower incisors were significantly proclined and intruded, while the lower first molars moved significantly in a mesial and vertical direction. CONCLUSIONS: The FRD protocol is effective in correcting Class II malocclusion with a combination of skeletal (mainly maxillary) and dentoalveolar (mainly mandibular) modifications.