Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Radiol ; 33(9): 5976-5983, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004569

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative MRI features for the diagnosis of pathologic regional lymph nodes at standard lymphadenectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: All adult patients with pancreatic MRI performed from 2011 to 2021 within 3 months of a pancreaticoduodenectomy were eligible for inclusion in this single-center retrospective cohort study. Regional nodes at standard lymphadenectomy were independently reviewed by two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists for the following qualitative features: heterogeneous T2 signal, round shape, indistinct margin, peri-nodal fat stranding, and restricted diffusion greater than the spleen. Quantitative characteristics including primary tumor size, largest node short- and long-axes length, number of regional nodes, absolute apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and ADC node-to-spleen signal index were assessed. Analysis was at the patient-level with surgical pathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: Of 75 patients, 85% (64/75) were positive for regional nodal disease on histopathology. None of the qualitative variables evaluated on MRI was associated with pathologic nodes. Median primary tumor maximum diameter was slightly larger for patients with pathologic nodes compared to those without (18 mm (10-42 mm) vs 16 mm (9-22 mm), p = 0.027). None of the other quantitative features was associated with pathologic nodes. Radiologist opinion was not associated with pathologic nodes (p = 0.520). Interobserver agreement was fair (kappa = 0.257). CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node morphologic features and radiologist opinion using MRI are of limited value for diagnosing PDAC regional nodal disease. Improved diagnostic techniques are needed given the prognostic implications of pathologic lymph nodes in these patients. KEY POINTS: • Multiple lymph node morphologic features routinely assessed on MRI for malignancies elsewhere in the body are likely not applicable when assessing for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma nodal disease. • Interobserver agreement for the presence or absence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lymph node morphologic features on MRI is fair (kappa = 0.257). • Many more lymph nodes are resected at PDAC standard lymphadenectomy than are detectable on MRI, median 25 vs 5 (p < 0.001), suggesting improved diagnostic techniques are needed to identify PDAC nodal disease.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
2.
Saudi Med J ; 41(6): 661-665, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32518936

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the yield of Papanicolaou tests (pap smears), including the characteristics of abnormal pap smears. Methods: In this record-based cross-sectional study, we reviewed pap smears of patients seen at the Family Medicine clinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center from January 2002 to January 2017. All women between the ages of 21 and 65 were included. Study-specific case report form was developed to capture patient demographics, pap smear histopathology (Bethesda III System), human papilloma virus polymerase chain reaction (HPV PCR), and the parity status. Results: A total of 3346 patients were included; 2.2% had abnormal pap smear. Most frequent abnormalities were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (2%), followed by glandular cell abnormalities (0.8%). Human papilloma virus infection was detected in 6.5% and all other infections were identified in 9.2% of all screened Pap smears. Conclusion: Pap smears remain an effective tool for cervical cancer screening. Low yields of pap smears compared to other developed countries could be attributed to lower risk factors for cervical cancer in Saudi Arabia. Routine screening especially among high risk women is strongly recommended.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 42: 266-268, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29324375

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary condition characterized by multiple colorectal adenomatous polyps. FAP is the most common adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Restorative proctocolectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure performed for patients suffering from FAP with different options for anastomosis, namely ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). The occurrence of adenomas is a common finding during follow up and surveillance post surgery for these patients. Although there are a few cases of carcinoma that were namely at the anal transitional zone (ATZ), there are only a few cases of ileal pouch related adenocarcinoma reported. This work has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria (Agha et al., 2016) [1]. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a case of a 34-year-old man diagnosed with FAP who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA, and subsequently referred to our center, who, despite appropriate measures and surveillance, developed adenocarcinoma in the ileal pouch. DISCUSSION: Restorative proctocolectomy for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) is the mainstay of treatment. There are different surgical options, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. The most favored option is proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) due to because it involves resection of the rectum. Despite these interventions, adenomas and/or carcinomas have been reported on follow up post surgery. CONCLUSION: Although the risk of developing adenomas or carcinomas in the ileal pouch post proctocolectomy with IPAA is low it should not be neglected as cancer occurrence or recurrence is unpredictable even with appropriate measures.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA