IVF/ICSI Outcomes After a Freeze-All Strategy: an Observational Cohort Study.

In order to inform patients undergoing ART regarding their chances for motherhood, it seems useful to describe "freeze all" outcomes according to the different potential indications. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of a "freeze-all approach" on the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) according to the indication. It is a cohort study including women who had undergone ovarian stimulation (OS) using an antagonist protocol with GnRH agonist triggering between 09.2016 and 09.2018 followed by a freeze-all cycle of blastocyst embryos. The ART outcomes were compared between the two main indications of the freeze-all strategy which were in our cohort: risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and endometriosis. The ART outcomes were also described for the others indications (inadequate endometrium and/or premature progesterone elevation at trigger day, two or more previous ART failures, and autoimmune disease and/or a high risk of thromboembolic disease (AI and/or TE risk)). In total, 658 women were included. The cLBR in the total population was 37.7% (248/658). The cLBR was significantly higher in the "OHSS risk" group (133/281, 47.3%) than in the "endometriosis" group (69/190, 36.3%) (p = 0.017). No significant differences were noted regarding perinatal outcomes, except a significantly higher risk of placenta praevia (PP) observed in the "endometriosis" group (10.1%) (p = 0.002). The "freeze-all approach" yielded good results in terms of the cLBR and especially in case of OHSS risk. These data should be taken into account when informing patients about the ART strategy and their chances of motherhood.

A new score based on biomarker values to predict the prognosis of locally advanced cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To define a prognostic score based on pretreatment values of leucocyte, platelet and hemoglobin in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 238 patients for LACC with negative PET imaging in the para-aortic (PA) area and who were undergoing laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomies. All patients were treated with chemo-radiation and brachytherapy. RESULTS: Patients had clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 (n = 76), IIA (n = 13), IIB (n = 122), III (n = 18) or IVA (n = 9). We identified three biological parameters (at the time of diagnosis) with three cut-offs which impacted disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS): <12 g/dL for hemoglobin, >10,000/µL for leucocyte and >300 × 109/L for platelet. A score is calculated, as shown in the table below, by adding the scores of all three biological parameters together (with a maximum score of three). DFS at 36 months was 87.3% [78.3-97.4], 58% [45-74.6], 79.1% [71.1-88], 58% [45-74.6] and 56.8% [37.8-85.4] for scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively. OS at 36 months was 92.6% [84.9-100], 84% [76.6-92.1], 62.5% [48.9-79.9] and 67% [46.8-96] for scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively. CONCLUSION: This score includes three biomarkers with easily remembered cut-offs that allow us to identify, at the time of diagnosis, those patients with a high risk of relapse (scores of two or three) and those requiring dose escalation.

The interval between oocyte retrieval and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer does not affect the live birth rate and obstetrical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The 'Freeze all' strategy, which consists of cryopreservation of all embryos after the ovarian stimulation has undergone extensive development in the past decade. The time required for the endometrium to revert to a prestimulation state after ovarian stimulation and thus the optimal time to perform a deferred embryo transfer after the stimulation has not been determined yet. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the time from oocyte retrieval to frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) on live birth rate (LBR), obstetrical and neonatal outcomes, in 'Freeze-all' cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a large observational cohort study in a tertiary care university hospital including four hundred and seventy-four first autologous FBT performed after ovarian stimulation in 'freeze all' cycles. Reproductive outcomes were compared between FBT performed within the first menstrual cycle after the oocyte retrieval ('cycle 1' group) or delayed FBT ('cycle ≥ 2' group). The main Outcome Measure was the Live birth rate. RESULT(S): A total of 188 FBT were included in the analysis in the 'cycle 1' group and 286 in the 'cycle ≥ 2' group. No significant differences were found between FBT performed within the first menstrual cycle after oocyte retrieval (the 'cycle 1' group) and delayed FBT (the 'cycle ≥ 2' group) in terms of the live birth rate [59/188 (31.38%) vs. 85/286 (29.72%); p = 0.696] and the miscarriage rate [20/82 (24.39%) vs. 37/125 (29.60%), respectively; p = 0.413]. The obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were also not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study did not detect statistically significant differences in the LBR for FBT performed within the first menstrual cycle after oocyte retrieval versus FBT following subsequent cycles. Embryo-endometrium interaction after a FBT does not appear to be impaired by potential adverse effects of COS whatever the number of cycle between oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer.