Prevalence of and factors associated with a treatment delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with gastrointestinal cancer in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised the issue of delayed cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the extent of delays and cancellations in cancer treatment, screening and diagnosis varied widely by geographic region and study design, highlighting the need for further research. METHODS: We used the Oncology Dynamics (OD) database featuring data from a cross-sectional, partially retrospective survey to analyze treatment delays in 30,171 GI cancer patients from five European countries (Germany, France, UK, Spain, and Italy). Risk factors for treatment delays were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Treatment delays were documented in 1342 (4.5%) of the study patients, with most patients having a delay of less than 3 months (3.2%). We observed decisive differences of treatment delay in relation to geographical, healthcare- and patient-related factors. Treatment delay was highest in France (6.7%) and Italy (6.5%) and lowest in Spain (1.9%, p < 0.001). 5.9% of patients treated at general hospitals but only 1.9% of those treated by office-based physicians experienced treatment delays (p < 0.001). Moreover, the difference between lines of therapy was highly significant and ranged from 7.2% for early-stage patients in primary therapy to 2.6% in advanced/metastatic cancer patients receiving 4th or later line therapy (p < 0.001). Finally, the proportion of cases with delayed treatments increased from 3.5% in asymptomatic patients (ECOG 0) to 9.9% in bedridden patients (ECOG IV, p < 0.001). Results were confirmed in multivariable logistic regression models. Our data highlight the problem of delayed treatment of tumor patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified risk factors for delayed treatment, such as poor general health or treatment in smaller hospitals, offer starting points for future concepts of "pandemic preparedness".

Therapy delay due to COVID-19 pandemic among European women with breast cancer: prevalence and associated factors.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer (BC) care, analyzing treatment delays and factors associated with them. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from the Oncology Dynamics (OD) database. Surveys of 26,933 women with BC performed between January 2021 and December 2022 in Germany, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, and Spain were examined. The study focused on determining the prevalence of treatment delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic, considering factors such as country, age group, treating facility, hormone receptor status, tumor stage, site of metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status. Baseline and clinical characteristics were compared for patients with and without therapy delay using chi-squared tests, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between demographic and clinical variables and therapy delay. RESULTS: The present study found that most therapy delays lasted less than 3 months (2.4%). Factors associated with higher risk of delay included being bedridden (OR 3.62; 95% CI 2.51-5.21), receiving neoadjuvant therapy (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.43-2.24) compared to adjuvant therapy, being treated in Italy (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.17-2.15) compared to Germany or treatment in general hospitals and non-academic cancer facilities (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13-2.44 and OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.14-2.09, respectively) compared to treatment by office-based physicians. CONCLUSION: Addressing factors associated with therapy delays, such as patient performance status, treatment settings, and geographic location, can help guide strategies for improved BC care delivery in the future.

Evaluation of the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics dataset.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics (OD) dataset by comparing its projected patient population structure with that outlined in published epidemiological literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The OD is an international cross-sectional semi-retrospective survey collecting anonymized patient cases from a representative panel of physicians via a web-based questionnaire; the cases are quality-checked and projected to the drug-treated prevalence using physician workload information. The present study verifies the OD 2018 projected patient proportions by indication and sex against prevalence figures in IARC's Globocan and the Cancer in Germany report by the Robert Koch Institute. Additionally, age group and metastasis presence distributions in gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa)-treated prostate cancer patients are compared with the findings of a registry-based study: Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Prostate Cancer Initiating GnRH Agonists/Antagonists Therapy Using a German Claims Database: Epidemiological and Patient Outcomes by Hupe et al. [3]. RESULTS: The OD demonstrated a cancer type distribution similar to the comparator sources. Cancer-specific sex distribution differences could be attributed to real-world diagnosis and treatment patterns. The age group distributions of GnRH-treated prostate cancer patients did not differ significantly between the OD and the Hupe et al. [3] study according to confidence interval comparisons and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. CONCLUSION: Projected patient distributions for the OD Germany were similar to those documented in the published literature. The dissimilarities can be attributed to the low drug-treated prevalence of some cancer types and sex-specific diagnosis timeline differences. Further investigations are needed to verify the reliability of histological biomarker data as well as patient demographics in other countries.

Risk Factors for Tinnitus in 37,692 Patients Followed in General Practices in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is frequently associated with a major hearing handicap, which has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. AIMS: The goal was to analyze risk factors for tinnitus in patients followed in general practices in Germany. METHODS: Patients who had received a first tinnitus diagnosis in one of 928 general practices between January 2014 and December 2017 were included in this study. Controls without a tinnitus diagnosis were matched (1:1) to tinnitus cases by age, sex, index year, and physician. In total, 18,846 patients with tinnitus and 18,846 matched controls without tinnitus were included in the present study. Potential risk factors for tinnitus included in the present study were diseases of the ear, diseases of the upper respiratory tract, mental disorders, diseases of the nervous system, endocrine diseases, diseases of the circulatory system, and hemolytic anemias. A multivariate logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to analyze the association between defined diagnoses and tinnitus. RESULTS: A total of 20 diseases were significantly associated with tinnitus. The five diagnoses displaying the strongest effect were vestibular neuronitis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-6.90), Menière's disease (OR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.78-5.86), Eustachian salpingitis and obstruction (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.72-3.67), presbycusis (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.93-2.67), and otalgia and ear effusion (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.56-2.53). CONCLUSIONS: Tinnitus was associated with a wide range of conditions, in particular disorders of the ear.