Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52470, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38371162

RESUMO

Introduction The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted research into various risk factors, including the role of body mass index (BMI) in disease severity. This study specifically examines the correlation between BMI and the severity of COVID-19 among intensive care unit (ICU) patients in Saudi Arabia, addressing a gap in region-specific data. The study aims to assess the impact of BMI on the severity of COVID-19 in a Saudi Arabian ICU patient cohort, providing insights into how this relationship varies in different demographic contexts. Materials and methods Employing a retrospective cohort design, the study analyzed data from adult ICU patients in Saudi Arabia diagnosed with COVID-19. It focused on variables like BMI at admission, demographic information, and COVID-19 outcomes including severity, recovery, and mortality. Statistical analysis involved regression models, adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities. Results Unlike global observations, the study found no significant correlation between BMI and COVID-19 severity in the Saudi Arabian context. This suggests that in this specific demographic, other factors may be more critical in determining the severity of the disease. Conclusion Our findings challenge the global consensus on BMI as a key factor in COVID-19 severity, highlighting the importance of regional differences in disease dynamics. They underscore the need for localized healthcare strategies and further research into diverse demographic factors affecting COVID-19. This study contributes to a broader understanding of the pandemic and encourages region-specific approaches in both clinical and public health spheres.

2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(2)2023 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36851365

RESUMO

Vaccination of healthcare providers has recently gained focused attention of public health officials. As HCPs have direct contact with the population, and HCPs significantly influence the population, this study aimed to compare the acceptance rate, advocacy rate, and beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine among HCPs in two time periods. In this repeated cross-sectional study, different HCPs were assessed in two periods ten months apart, i.e., November to December 2020 and September to October 2021, which were before and after COVID-19 vaccine approval by authorities. The study was conducted in Qatif Central Hospital, Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. There were 609 respondents: 236 participants in the first period and 373 participants in the second period. Only 13 participants did not get the COVID-19 vaccine. There was around a 40% difference in the acceptance rate between the two study periods; the latter period was higher at 94.7%. Furthermore, 24.1% was the difference between the willingness to advocate the COVID-19 vaccine for others; the first period had a lower percentage (60.1%). Overall, results of the study showed that vaccine hesitancy, as well as the willingness to advocate for the vaccine, were improved between the pre-vaccine approval period and post-vaccine approval period, showing that the efforts made by the government improved COVID-19 acceptance and advocacy among HCPs. However, vaccine hesitancy is not a new issue, and for a better understanding of HCPs' beliefs, a qualitative study is needed.

3.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(6): 1097-1103, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856543

RESUMO

This study aimed to assess the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with rheumatic diseases and identify the risk factors associated with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. This was a retrospective study in a tertiary care center conducted through the period between March 2020 and November 2020 and included all adult patients with rheumatic diseases who tested positive on the COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. We assessed the patients' demographic data, history of rheumatic disease, COVID-19 symptoms and experimental treatment, if any, their disease course, and outcome. In all, 47 patients were included, and most were females. The commonest rheumatic diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (53.2%), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (21.3%), and psoriatic arthritis (10.6%). Methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine were the most commonly used disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in 36.1% and 25.5%, respectively. Out of 47 patients, 48.9% required hospitalization with a median hospital stay of 7 days. Severe COVID-19 pneumonia, defined as clinical signs of pneumonia plus one of the following: respiratory rate > 30 bpm, severe respiratory distress, or oxygen saturation < 90% in room air was observed in 19.1% of the patients, and one patient died. We found that elderly patients with a mean age of 65.3 years were more likely to develop severe COVID-19 pneumonia and that was statistically significant. Our study showed that elderly patients with a mean age of 65 years and having rheumatic diseases had an increased risk of hospital admission and development of severe COVID-19 pneumonia.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Reumáticas , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Open Access Rheumatol ; 12: 91-96, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32607016

RESUMO

We report a case of 30-year-old female who presented initially with hair loss, photosensitive malar rash, morning stiffness and synovitis. She was diagnosed with Rhupus syndrome based on clinical and laboratory findings. Few months after starting hydroxychloroquine, esomeprazole and azathioprine, and failing methotrexate (because of erosive pill-induced esophagitis), she presented with generalized maculopapular dusky reddish rash in her body, back and extremities. Her anti-double stranded-DNA, anti-nuclear antibody, anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB were positive. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody was moderately positive. She had low complements: C3 and C4. Herpes simplex IgM and mycoplasma tested negative. Skin biopsy from right arm showed evidence of erythema multiform. She met the criteria for the diagnosis of Rowell syndrome. We managed her with hydroxychloroquine, prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil and topical agents and discontinued esomeprazole. We also review the management of Rowell syndrome in the literature.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA