RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with a relapse rate of 10-30% after allogeneic transplantation (alloHCT). Current recommendations to treat relapse include withdrawal of immunosuppression, donor lymphocyte infusion, and potentially a second alloHCT. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have shown efficacy as salvage therapy by inducing an immune response and improving donor chimerism for myeloid neoplasm post-HCT. Data is limited on use of HMA for MF post-alloHCT relapse. OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of using HMA for MF patients relapsing after alloHCT. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients with MF post-alloHCT relapse who received HMA to determine response via restoration of donor chimerism and clearance of molecular mutation. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years (range 41-72) with 92% classified as intermediate-2/high-risk by DIPSS and 83% as high/very high risk by MIPSS70+. The median time to relapse post-alloHCT was 282.5 days (range 96-2388) with median donor chimerism 57.82% (range 2.48-84) prior to starting HMA. After two cycles of HMA, 58% experienced restoration of donor chimerism. Molecular clearance of pre-HCT driver mutations occurred in 50% of patients at the most recent follow-up. New chronic GvHD occurred in 50% of patients with most being mild to moderate that resolved after treatment. CONCLUSION: HMA was safe and effective in a high-risk population after post-alloHCT relapse and is an option for patients in the future.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The impact of spliceosome mutations on allo-HCT outcome is unclear and further understanding is needed to assess the implications of this class of mutations on risk of relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in order to make decision regarding timing of allo-HCT. We examined the allo-HCT outcomes of MDS/CMML patients based on their spliceosome mutation profile to understand the impact of these mutations on transplant outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of MDS/CMML patients with and without spliceosome mutations undergoing allo-HCT. METHODS: This is a single institution, retrospective study of MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen at City of Hope from January 2016 to December 2021. Among them, patients who underwent molecular mutation profiling by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) for a set of genes known to be mutated in myeloid neoplasms are included in this analysis. We compared OS, relapse free survival, NRM and acute/chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidence between the spliceosome-mutated and unmutated groups. RESULTS: We identified 258 consecutive MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT. Of these, 126 (48.8â¯%) patients had molecular profiling done among whom 57 (45.2â¯%) patients carried a spliceosome mutation. 84.9â¯% of patients had MDS and 55.6â¯% underwent a matched unrelated donor transplant. The median age for the whole cohort was 66 years (range 12-77).78.6â¯% and 73.7â¯% received RIC in the spliceosome and non-spliceosome groups, respectively. The 2-year OS for the whole cohort was 66.5â¯% (95â¯%CI 0.55-0.75) with a day 100 NRM of 7.1â¯% and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 20â¯%. Grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 36.3â¯% (95â¯% CI 0.27-0.44) and any chronic GVHD at 2-years was 48.4â¯% (95â¯% CI 0.37-0.58). Patients who carried a spliceosome mutation had a significantly better 2-year survival of 83.8â¯% vs 55.9â¯% in the non-spliceosome group (P=0.002) and a better PFS of 73.7â¯% vs 50.0â¯% (P=0.007). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2-years 15.9â¯% vs 18.5â¯% (P=0.59) between two groups but the spliceosome group had a significantly lower NRM at 2-years 10.4â¯% vs 31.5â¯% (P=0.009). There was no difference in incidence of acute or chronic GVHD between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MDS or CMML who underwent allo-HCT, our study shows better OS for patients who have spliceosome mutations due to lower NRM compared to those carrying non- spliceosome mutations. This favorable outcome of the spliceosome-mutated patients could have implications for timing of allo-HCT, particularly for patients in the intermediate MDS prognostic risk groups.
RESUMO
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative treatment for most patients with hematologic malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we investigated outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning MAC regimen in combination with fludarabine, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as higher-intensity graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT (related/haploidentical versus unrelated [MMUD]) with fractionated-total body irradiation (fTBI) plus fludarabine and PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46.5%), acute myelogenous leukemia (36.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years, and 126 patients (81.3%) were an ethnic minority. The Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index was ≥3 in 36.1% of the patients, and 29% had a Disease Risk Index (DRI) of high/very high. The donor type was haploidentical in 67.1% of cases and MMUD in 32.9%. At 2 years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.4% and overall survival (OS) was 80.6% for all subjects. Donor type did not impact OS (hazard ratio [HR], .72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35 to 1.49; P = .37) and DFS (HR, .78; 95% CI, .41 to 1.48; P = .44), but younger donors was associated with less grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 6.60; 95% CI, 1.80 to 24.19; P = .004) and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.34; P < .001), with a trend toward better survival (P = .099). The use of an MMUD was associated with significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median, 15 days versus 16 days; P = .014) and platelet recovery (median, 18 days versus 24 days; P = .029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between the haploidentical donor and MMUD groups. Nonrelapse mortality (HR, .86; 95% CI, .34 to 2.20; P = .76) and relapse risk (HR, .78; 95% CI, .33 to 1.85; P = .57) were comparable in the 2 groups. Patient age <40 years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (P = .004 and .029, respectively). High or very high DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.34; P = .008). In conclusion, fludarabine/fTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of donor relationship to the patient, provided promising results, and increased access to HCT for patients without a matched donor, especially patients from ethnic minorities and patients of mixed race.
RESUMO
The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients (n = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis for matched donor HCT (ETOP-package; n = 196) or FTBI-Fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis for HLA- mismatched (related or unrelated) donors (FLU-package; n = 64). Patients in FLU-package showed a significant delay in engraftment (p < 0.001) and lower cumulative incidence (CI) of any and extensive chronic GVHD (p = 0.009 and 0.001, respectively). At the median follow up of 4.6 years (range 1-12 years); non-relapse mortality, overall or leukemia-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were not significantly impacted by the choice of conditioning. However, in patients at CR2 or with measurable residual disease (MRD+), there was a trend towards higher relapse after FLU-package (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively), while patients at CR1 regardless of MRD status had similar outcomes despite the package/donor type (p = 0.9 and 0.7, respectively). Our data suggests that FLU-package for alternative donors offers comparable outcomes to ETOP-package for matched donor HCT to treat ALL. Disease status and depth of remission at HCT were independent predictors for better outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP) is highly expressed on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bulk blasts and leukemic stem cells (LSCs), but not on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), providing an opportunity to target and eliminate the disease, while sparing normal hematopoiesis. Herein, we report the activity of BIF002, a novel anti-IL1RAP/CD3 T cell engager (TCE) in AML. METHODS: Antibodies to IL1RAP were isolated from CD138+ B cells collected from the immunized mice by optoelectric positioning and single cell sequencing. Individual mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were produced and characterized, from which we generated BIF002, an anti-human IL1RAP/CD3 TCE using Fab arm exchange. Mutations in human IgG1 Fc were introduced to reduce FcγR binding. The antileukemic activity of BIF002 was characterized in vitro and in vivo using multiple cell lines and patient derived AML samples. RESULTS: IL1RAP was found to be highly expressed on most human AML cell lines and primary blasts, including CD34+ LSC-enriched subpopulation from patients with both de novo and relapsed/refractory (R/R) leukemia, but not on normal HSCs. In co-culture of T cells from healthy donors and IL1RAPhigh AML cell lines and primary blasts, BIF002 induced dose- and effector-to-target (E:T) ratio-dependent T cell activation and leukemic cell lysis at subnanomolar concentrations. BIF002 administered intravenously along with human T cells led to depletion of leukemic cells, and significantly prolonged survival of IL1RAPhigh MOLM13 or AML patient-derived xenografts with no off-target side effects, compared to controls. Of note, BiF002 effectively redirects T cells to eliminate LSCs, as evidenced by the absence of disease initiation in secondary recipients of bone marrow (BM) from BIF002+T cells-treated donors (median survival not reached; all survived > 200 days) compared with recipients of BM from vehicle- (median survival: 26 days; p = 0.0004) or isotype control antibody+T cells-treated donors (26 days; p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The novel anti-IL1RAP/CD3 TCE, BIF002, eradicates LSCs and significantly prolongs survival of AML xenografts, representing a promising, novel treatment for AML.
Assuntos
Proteína Acessória do Receptor de Interleucina-1 , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Células-Tronco Neoplásicas , Linfócitos T , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/imunologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Animais , Camundongos , Proteína Acessória do Receptor de Interleucina-1/imunologia , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Células-Tronco Neoplásicas/imunologia , Células-Tronco Neoplásicas/patologia , Células-Tronco Neoplásicas/efeitos dos fármacos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Camundongos Endogâmicos NODRESUMO
Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) represents a distinct disease entity characterized by myeloid-related somatic mutations with a variant allele fraction of ≥2% in individuals with unexplained cytopenia(s) but without a myeloid neoplasm (MN). Notably, CCUS carries a risk of progressing to MN, particularly in cases featuring high-risk mutations. Understanding CCUS requires dedicated studies to elucidate its risk factors and natural history. Our analysis of 357 CCUS patients investigated the interplay between clonality, cytopenia, and prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified 3 key adverse prognostic factors: the presence of splicing mutation(s) (score = 2 points), platelet count <100×109/L (score = 2.5), and ≥2 mutations (score = 3). Variable scores were based on the coefficients from the Cox proportional hazards model. This led to the development of the Clonal Cytopenia Risk Score (CCRS), which stratified patients into low- (score <2.5 points), intermediate- (score 2.5-<5), and high-risk (score ≥5) groups. The CCRS effectively predicted 2-year cumulative incidence of MN for low- (6.4%), intermediate- (14.1%), and high- (37.2%) risk groups, respectively, by Gray's test (P <.0001). We further validated the CCRS by applying it to an independent CCUS cohort of 104 patients, demonstrating a c-index of 0.64 (P =.005) in stratifying the cumulative incidence of MN. Our study underscores the importance of integrating clinical and molecular data to assess the risk of CCUS progression, making the CCRS a valuable tool that is practical and easily calculable. These findings are clinically relevant, shaping the management strategies for CCUS and informing future clinical trial designs.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Mutação , Indução de Remissão , Estaurosporina , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Tirosina Quinase 3 Semelhante a fms/genética , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Estaurosporina/análogos & derivados , Estaurosporina/uso terapêutico , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a curative therapy for many malignant and non-malignant hematologic disorders. Chronic graft-versus-host (cGVHD) disease remains a significant hurdle for long-term survival in patients post allo-HCT, and it remains the leading cause of late non-relapse mortality. The risk factors for development of cGVHD include degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity, increasing recipient age, use of peripheral blood stem cells as a source, myeloablative conditioning regimens, prior acute GVHD (aGVHD), and female donor to male recipient. Our biological understanding of cGVHD is mostly derived from transplantation mouse models and patient data. There are three distinct phases in the development of cGVHD. Approaches to prevent GVHD include pharmacologic strategies such as calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus) combined with methotrexate or mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus), and IMP dehydrogenase inhibitors (mycophenolate mofetil). Increasingly, posttransplant cyclophosphamide is emerging as a promising strategy for GVCHD prevention especially in a setting of reduced intensity conditioning. Other approaches include serotherapy (ATG, Campath) and graft manipulation strategies. A significant obstacle to evaluating the response of novel GVHD-directed therapies has been standardized response assessments. This has functioned as a barrier to designing and interpreting clinical trials that are structured around the treatment of cGVHD. Novel endpoints including failure-free survival, Graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), and current GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CGRFS) may create a clearer picture for post-HCT outcomes. Targeted therapies including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition, JAK1/2 inhibition, and ROCK2 inhibitors have improved cGVHD therapy, especially in the steroid refractory setting. Continued improvement in prophylactic strategies for cGVHD, identification of accurate cGVHD treatment endpoints, and access to novel therapeutic agents are expected to improve cGVHD outcomes.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Animais , Camundongos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Ciclosporina , Tacrolimo , Ácido Micofenólico , Metotrexato , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Condicionamento Pré-TransplanteRESUMO
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common complication after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HaploHCT). Severe CRS after haploHCT leads to higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS). Tocilizumab (TOCI) is an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor and is commonly used as first-line for CRS management after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, but the impact of TOCI administration for CRS management on Haplo HCT outcomes is not known. In this single center retrospective analysis, we compared HCT outcomes in patients treated with or without TOCI for CRS management after HaploHCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide- (PTCy-) based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Of the 115 patients eligible patients who underwent HaploHCT at City of Hope between 2019 to 2021 and developed CRS, we identified 11 patients who received tocilizumab for CRS management (TOCI). These patients were matched with 21 patients who developed CRS but did not receive tocilizumab (NO-TOCI) based on age at the time of HCT (≤64 years or >65 years or older), conditioning intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative), and CRS grading (1, 2, versus 3-4). Instead of 22 controls, we chose 21 patients because there was only 1 control matched with 1 TOCI treatment patient in 1 stratum. With only 11 patients in receiving tocilizumab for CRS treatment, matching with 21 patients who developed CRS but did not receive tocilizumab, we had 80% power to detect big differences (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.4 or higher) in transplantation outcomes using a 2-sided 0.05 test. The power would be reduced to about 20% to 30% if the difference was moderate (HR = 2.0) using the same test. No CRS-related deaths were recorded in either group. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 21 days (range 16-43) in TOCI and 18 days (range 14-23) in NO-TOCI group (HR = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28-1.06, P = .08). Median time to platelet engraftment was 34 days (range 20-81) in TOCI and 28 days (range 12-94) in NO-TOCI group (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.25-1.22, P = .19). Cumulative incidences of day 100 acute GvHD grades II-IV (P = .97) and grades III-IV (P = .47) were similar between the 2 groups. However, cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at 1 year was significantly higher in patients receiving TOCI (64% versus 24%; P = .05). Rates of NRM (P = .66), relapse (P = .83), disease-free survival (P = .86), and overall survival (P = .73) were similar at 1 year after HCT between the 2 groups. Tocilizumab administration for CRS management after HaploHCT appears to be safe with no short-term adverse effect and no effect on relapse rate. However, the significantly higher cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD, negates the high efficacy of PTCy on GvHD prophylaxis in this patient population. Therefore using tocilizumab for CRS management in the HaploHCT population with PTCy maybe kept only for patients with severe CRS. The impact on such approach on long term outcome in HaploHCT with PTCy will need to be evaluated in a larger retrospective study or a prospective manner.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/farmacologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/etiologia , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/prevenção & controle , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversos , IdosoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In November 2020, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at high risk for disease progression. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 38 adult hematology patients who received mAbs from 11/2020 to 2/2021. RESULTS: Thirty (79%) patients received bamlanivimab and 8 (21%) casirivimab-imdevimab. Four (11%) patients were hospitalized due to COVID-19, two (5%) progressed to severe disease and one patient (3%) died within 30 days from COVID-19 disease. Most patients (n = 34, 89%) ultimately tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, with 34% (n = 13) clearing the virus within 14 days after mAb infusion. The median time to clearance of viral shedding was 25.5 days (range: 7-138). After mAb infusion, most patients with hematological malignancies (HM) (n = 10/15; 67%) resumed therapy for underlying disease with a median delay of 21.5 days (range: 12-42). We observed a significant difference in hospitalization among patients who received a HCT versus non-HCT (0% n = 0/26 and 36% n = 4/11, respectively; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specific mAb was safe and may reduce hospitalization compared to what is reported in malignant hematology patients at high risk for disease progression. Our HCT cohort patients had less hospitalization rate compared with HM cohort patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Hematologia , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Antivirais , Progressão da Doença , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy. However, outcomes with novel antibody and cellular therapies in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Ph-like ALL are largely unknown. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients (n = 96) with r/r B-ALL and fusions associated with Ph-like who received novel salvage therapies. Patients were treated with 149 individual novel regimens (blinatumomab = 83, inotuzumab ozogamicin [InO] = 36, and CD19CAR T cells = 30). The median age at first novel salvage therapy was 36 years (range; 18-71). Ph-like fusions were IGH::CRLF2 (n = 48), P2RY8::CRLF2 (n = 26), JAK2 (n = 9), ABL-class (n = 8), EPOR::IGH (n = 4) and ETV6::NTRK2 (n = 1). CD19CAR T cells were administered later in the course of therapy compared to blinatumomab and InO (p < .001) and more frequently in recipients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) (p = .002). Blinatumomab was administered at an older age compared to InO and CAR T-cells (p = .004). The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates were 63%, 72%, and 90% following blinatumomab, InO and CD19CAR, respectively, among which 50%, 50%, and 44% of responders underwent consolidation with alloHCT, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the type of novel therapy (p = .044) and pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .006) predicted the CR/CRi rate, while the Ph-like fusion subtype (p = .016), pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .022) and post-response consolidation with alloHCT (p < .001) influenced event-free survival. In conclusion, novel therapies are effective in inducing high remission rates in patients with r/r Ph-like ALL and successfully transitioning the responders to alloHCT.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inotuzumab Ozogamicina/uso terapêutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Indução de Remissão , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
In the current post-pandemic era, recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) deserve special attention. In these vulnerable patients, vaccine effectiveness is reduced by post-transplant immune-suppressive therapy; consequently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) is often associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Characterizing SARS-CoV-2 adaptive immunity transfer from immune donors to HCT recipients in the context of immunosuppression will help identify optimal timing and vaccination strategies that can provide adequate protection to HCT recipients against infection with evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. We performed a prospective observational study (NCT04666025 at ClinicalTrials.gov) to longitudinally monitor the transfer of SARS-CoV-2-specific antiviral immunity from HCT donors, who were either vaccinated or had a history of COVID-19, to their recipients via T-cell replete graft. Levels, function, and quality of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses were longitudinally analyzed up to 6 months post-HCT in 14 matched unrelated donor/recipients and four haploidentical donor/recipient pairs. A markedly skewed donor-derived SARS-CoV-2 CD4 T-cell response was measurable in 15 (83%) recipients. It showed a polarized Th1 functional profile, with the prevalence of central memory phenotype subsets. SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ was detectable throughout the observation period, including early post-transplant (day +30). Functionally experienced SARS-CoV-2 Th1-type T cells promptly expanded in two recipients at the time of post-HCT vaccination and in two others who were infected and survived post-transplant COVID-19 infection. Our data suggest that donor-derived SARS-CoV-2 T-cell responses are functional in immunosuppressed recipients and may play a critical role in post-HCT vaccine response and protection from the fatal disease. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04666025.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfócitos T , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Doadores de Tecidos , Transplantados , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19RESUMO
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication that can be observed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate that has demonstrated high efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but is associated with an increased risk of SOS in HCT recipients. Here we aimed to examine the incidence and outcomes of SOS in 47 adult patients with R/R ALL who received inotuzumab therapy and subsequently underwent HCT at our institution. All patients received prophylactic therapy with ursodiol, and continuous low-dose heparin also was administered to patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC). SOS occurred in 12 patients (26%) post-HCT, at a median onset of 11 days (range, 3 to 41 days). SOS was graded as very severe in 50% (n = 6), severe in 25% (n = 3), and mild in 25% (n = 3). All patients diagnosed with SOS received treatment with defibrotide for a median of 21 days (range, 3 to 34 days), with resolution of SOS occurring in 8 patients (67%). Mortality from SOS was 33% (n = 4) and occurred at a median of 10 days from diagnosis (range, 3 to 31 days) in patients graded as very severe (n = 3) or severe (n = 1). There were no significant differences between patients who developed SOS and those who did not develop SOS in the median time from the last dose of inotuzumab to transplantation (46 days versus 53 days; P = .37), use of an MAC regimen (42% versus 49%; P = .75), number of lines of therapy prior to inotuzumab (P = .79), median number of administered cycles of inotuzumab (2 versus 2; P = .14), or receipt of inotuzumab as the last therapy prior to HCT (67% versus 66%; P = 1.0). Sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was used more frequently in the SOS group (75% versus 29%; P < .01), but there was no between-group difference in the peak sirolimus level (P = .81) or the median time to peak sirolimus level (7 days versus 3.5 days; P = .39). In univariable analysis, only the use of sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased risk of SOS (hazard ratio [HR], 7.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 33.6; P < .01). In the SOS group, the 100-day mortality rate was 33% (n = 4), and median overall survival (OS) post-HCT was 4.3 months (range, 0.2 to 57.2 months). In the group without SOS, the 100-day mortality rate was 14% (n = 5) and the median OS post-HCT was 10.7 months (range, .52 to 39.6 months). In this study cohort, SOS was prevalent in HCT recipients who had been treated with inotuzumab prior to transplantation, and sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis was a risk factor for SOS in inotuzumab recipients.
Assuntos
Linfoma de Burkitt , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B , Humanos , Adulto , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva/etiologia , Inotuzumab Ozogamicina/efeitos adversos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/induzido quimicamente , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/complicações , Sirolimo , Linfoma de Burkitt/induzido quimicamente , Linfoma de Burkitt/complicações , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controleAssuntos
Compostos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos com Pontes , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Humanos , Compostos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) combined with tacrolimus (TAC) as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is safe and effective. Optimal serum levels of TAC in this combination remain undetermined. We hypothesized that TAC at initial steady state (TISS) of <10 ng/mL could promote optimal transplant outcomes and prevent TAC-associated toxicities. We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive case series of 210 patients who received PTCy/TAC-based prophylaxis post-HCT from 1/2013-6/2018. Patients received HCT from haploidentical (n = 172) or mismatched donors (n = 38), and flat dose (FD) or weight-based dose (WBD) TAC. Twenty-four-month overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and relapse rate (RR) were 61%, 56%, and 22%, respectively, in TISS < 10 ng/mL cohort (n = 176), and 50%, 43%, and 35%, respectively, in TISS ≥ 10 ng/mL cohort (n = 34) (OS, P = 0.71; DFS, P = 0.097; RR, P = 0.031). OS, DFS, RR, non-relapse mortality, acute GvHD grade II-IV, grade III-IV or chronic GvHD by TISS were similar in multivariable analysis. TISS ≥ 10 ng/mL conferred increased risk of viral infection (P = 0.003). More patients receiving FD vs. WBD had TISS < 10 ng/mL (P = 0.001). Overall, TISS < 10 ng/mL early post HCT conferred similar survival outcomes and lowered risk of viral infection and toxicities compared to TISS ≥ 10 ng/mL.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tacrolimo/uso terapêuticoAssuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/induzido quimicamente , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a significant percentage of patients diagnosed with NSCLC. However, there still remains no therapeutic option designed to target KRAS. In an era with immunotherapy as a dominant treatment option in metastatic NSCLC, the role of immunotherapy in. KRAS: mutated patients is not clear. METHODS: Eligible patients diagnosed with NSCLC and found to have a KRAS mutation were identified in an institutional lung cancer database. Demographic, clinical, and molecular data was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were identified for this retrospective analysis. Majority of patients were Caucasian (73%), diagnosed with stage IV (70%) adenocarcinoma (87%), and had a KRAS codon 12 mutation (78%). Twenty percent of patients were treated with immunotherapy. Median overall survival was 28 months in the cohort and patients who received immunotherapy were found to have better survival versus those who did not (33 vs. 22 months, P=0.31). Furthermore, there was an association between high survival and patients who received immunotherapy (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with KRAS mutations have a unique co-mutation phenotype that requires further investigation. Immunotherapy seems to be an effective choice of treatment for KRAS positive patients in any treatment-line setting and yields better outcomes than conventional chemotherapy. The relationship between immunotherapy and KRAS mutations requires further studies to confirm survival advantage.