Type 2 diabetes treatment intensification in general practice in France in 2008-2009: the DIAttitude Study.

AIMS: To evaluate the current procedures in French general practice of intensifying hypoglycaemic treatment in orally treated type 2 diabetic patients, according to the French recommendations. METHODS: Type 2 diabetic patient characteristics, HbA(1c) values, hypoglycaemic treatment and physician characteristics were collected from the electronic records of a panel of French general practitioners. Factors associated with the time until intensification of treatment were studied with the Cox model. RESULTS: Among 17 493 orally treated patients with at least two available HbA(1c) values, 3118 patients (18%) required treatment intensification; 65% were on monotherapy, 31% on bitherapy and 4% on tritherapy. These patients were followed for a maximum of 14 months or until treatment was intensified. Treatment was intensified after the second high HbA(1c) value for 1212 patients (39%); this was immediate for 13% of these patients, within 6 months for 39% and within one year for 59%. Treatment intensification was less likely the older the patient, and more likely the higher the first HbA(1c) value, up to an HbA(1c) threshold of 9%. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic inertia in caring for type 2 diabetic patients in France is frequent, at least for patients treated in general practice. This inadequate glycaemic control would be expected to have significant patient and public health consequences, with higher rates of associated diabetic complications.

Therapeutic management of orally treated type 2 diabetic patients, by French general practitioners in 2010: the DIAttitude Study.

AIM: To describe the behaviour of French general practitioners (GP) regarding intensification of hypoglycaemic agents in orally treated type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients, according to their HbA(1c) level. METHODS: General practitioners were recruited from a panel of office-based general practitioners. T2D patients who had been orally treated for at least 6 months were included in the study; their characteristics were recorded, and their HbA(1c) values and hypoglycaemic treatments over the previous 24 months extracted from electronic records The major reasons for intensification (or no intensification) of hypoglycaemic agents were recorded at the inclusion visit. RESULTS: A total of 236 general practitioners recruited 2109 T2D patients: 1732 had at least one HbA(1c) value recorded in the previous 6 months, and 52%, 33% and 14% had been treated, with oral hypoglycaemic agents in monotherapy, bitherapy or tri-or quadritherapy, respectively. Of these patients, 702 (41%) remained uncontrolled (47%, 39% and 20% respectively) and according to the current French guidelines needed treatment intensification. Only 46 (7%) had their treatment intensified at inclusion. Of those without intensified treatment, 60% were treated with monotherapy; the main reason given by the general practitioners for not intensifying treatment was a satisfactory HbA(1c) level (53%), although 32% had an HbA(1c)>7%. Other reasons were: lifestyle advice had greater priority (20%); decision was postponed until the next visit (11%); HbA(1c) had decreased since last visit (7%; not confirmed by available data in 58% of cases); a medical priority other than diabetes (6%) and other reasons related to the patient (3%). CONCLUSION: For T2D patients managed by French general practitioners, guidelines are not consistently followed: HbA(1c) should be monitored more frequently and treatment adjusted according to HbA(1c) levels.

Characteristics and six-month outcomes in a cohort of 8288 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with previous history of acute coronary syndrome or stroke: the French PREVENIR 3 survey.

AIMS: To evaluate the cardiovascular prognosis of 1845 Diabetic Patients (DP) and 6443 Non-Diabetic Patients (NDP) in secondary prevention. METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively if they had had a previous history of ischemic stroke or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) i.e. Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Unstable Angina (UA) within a period of five years preceding inclusion. For each patient, the number of hospitalizations and vital status were recorded each month over a 6-month period (mean follow-up: 4.8 months). RESULTS: 306 patients (9.5/100--person years; 95% CI, 8.5 to 10.6) had undergone at least one subsequent event (hospitalization for ACS, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). A majority of these events were non-fatal ACS (n=248). The cumulative incidence rate of subsequent events was higher in DP: 12.6/100- person years (10.0 to 15.2) than in NDP: 8.6/100--person years (7.5 to 9.8). DP were significantly at higher risk of subsequent cardiovascular events (OR: 1.34; P=0.025) after adjustment for confounding factors. 93% of coronary DP and NDP underwent a recurrent event affecting the same location. When the index episode was a stroke, 71% of DP had a subsequent stroke vs. 47% of NDP. CONCLUSION: in secondary prevention, the risk of mortality and subsequent vascular events is independently higher in French DP than in NDP. The locations affected by each type of subsequent cardiovascular event seemed correlated to the baseline diagnosis, whatever the diabetic status, even when the frequency of subsequent strokes increased (not significantly) in DP when compared to NDP.

[Role of cardiologists in control of risk factors and prescription of secondary-preventive drugs in elderly patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The French ELIAGE-MG survey]. / Prévention secondaire du sujet agé suivi en médecine générale: influence du suivi cardiologique sur le contrôle des facteurs de risque et l'utilisation des médicaments de prévention. L'etude ELIAGE-MG.

Little information is available as regards risk factor control and use of secondary prevention medications in elderly populations with documented atherosclerotic disease. The ELIAGE-MG survey included 3247 patients with cardiovascular disease seen in ambulatory practice. Overall, both the control of risk factors and the use of secondary prevention medications was suboptimal in these patients. However, those having consulted a cardiologist at any time during the previous year had better control of risk factors (and particularly LDL cholesterol and smoking) and were more often prescribed recommended secondary prevention medications.

[Trends in discharge prescriptions for patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes in France from 1995 to 2000. Data from the Usik 1995, Prevenir 1, Prevenir 2 and Usic 2000 surveys]. / Evolution du traitement de sortie après hospitalisation pour syndrome coronaire aigu en France entre 1995 et 2000: données des études Usik 1995, Prévenir 1 et 2 et Usic 2000.

The use of cardiovascular secondary prevention medications in patients with acute coronary syndromes was compared in 4 sequential observational surveys carried out in France from 1995 to 2000. The Usik 1995 and Usic 2000 surveys included patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction, while the 2 Prevenir surveys (1998 and 1999) assessed the medications prescribed in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Antiplatelet agents were prescribed in 91% of the patients in 1995, 93% in 1998 and 1999 and 96% in 2000; for beta-blockers, the respective figures were: 64%, 68%, 75% and 76%. For ACE-Inhibitors, the figures were: 46%, 41%, 41% and 50%. For statins, the prescription increased from 10% to 36%, 59% and 64%. In 1995, 8% of the patients received both antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers and statins (4% of them also had an ACE-Inhibitor); in 2000, the respective figures were 53% and 27%. The results of the recent trials of secondary prevention medications have had a considerable impact on real-life practice in France during the late 1990s.

[Baseline characteristics and management of patients less than 45 years of age hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes: results from the nationwide French PREVENIR 1 and PREVENIR 2 studies]. / Caractéristiques initiales et prise en charge thérapeutique des sujets jeunes (âge inférieur à 45 ans) hospitalisés pour syndrome coronaire aigu: résultats des études françaises PREVENIR 1 et PREVENIR 2.

Of 2,626 patients admitted for acute coronary syndromes and participating in the PREVENIR 1 and 2 registries, 202 (8%) were aged less than 45 years. Younger patients were more often smokers (79% versus 37%), but systemic hypertension and diabetes were less frequent. Reperfusion therapy was more frequently used in the younger patients (63% versus 46%). At hospital discharge, aspirin and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed as often in younger and older patients. In contrast, beta-blocking agents and statins were used more often in the younger patients. More younger patients participated in a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Left ventricular ejection fraction was less altered in the younger age group and none of the younger patients died between hospital discharge and six months follow-up.

[Impact of an information campaign on cardiovascular risk factors. 5-year results at the study town Epernon]. / Influence d'une campagne d'information sur les facteurs de risque cardio-vasculaire. Epernon ville d'étude, résultats à 5 ans.

OBJECTIVES: Information campaigns are implemented to improve knowledge of cardiovascular disease and risk factors. The impact of these programs must be evaluated to determine whether they truly contribute to modifying risk factors in the population. METHODS: A 5-year information campaign on cardiovascular disease and risk factors was conducted in Epernon, France. The main objectives of the campaign focused on stopping smoking, regular physical exercise and balanced nutrition. Data were collected from a representative sample of the female and male population aged 20 to 65 years selected from the study town Epernon (500 subjects), and in control towns, Magny-en-Vexin and Moret-sur-Loing (200 subjects). The study town and control towns were comparable for population, demographic characteristics and geographic localization (distance from Paris). The subjects were invited to respond to a questionnaire on demographic data, attitudes toward health, risk factors and diet and underwent a clinical examination with blood tests. RESULTS: The initial sample included 961 subjects and 68.5% participated in the final survey. We were unable to evidence any significant difference in risk factors or the 10-year risk score calculated from the Framingham equation adapted to France. The information campaign was well accepted, the population not expression a feeling of lassitude. The campaign had a minimal effect on the way individuals relate to health. There was a fall in mean energy intake, mainly fat calories, which was similar in all three towns. CONCLUSION: No major modification in cardiovascular risk factors was observed in this low-risk population, suggesting that future information campaigns should be aimed at targeted populations with a higher risk profile using simple and selected messages.

Efficacy of low-dose pravastatin in patients with mild hyperlipidemia associated with type II diabetes mellitus.

A 16 week, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study was designed to determine the effects of low-dose pravastatin on cholesterol concentrations in patients with mild hypercholesterolemia and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Following a 6-to 8-week dietary run-in period, a mean serum total cholesterol (TC) level > 5.2 mmol/L (200 mg/dL), but < 7.8 mmol/L (300 mg/dL) was required for entry. Metabolic control of diabetes was determined by a hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc) level less than twice the upper limit of normal on two occasions. Eighty six (86) patients recruited in 5 French diabetic clinics, were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 (pravastatin 10 mg or placebo), and 74 completed the study. There were 12 discontinuations: 5 (11.6%) in the pravastatin group and 7 (16.3%) in the placebo group. Drop-out was due to an adverse event in 1 patient (2.3%) in the pravastatin group and in 5 patients (11.6%) in the placebo group. Thirty five (35) placebo patients and 14 pravastatin patients had their dose of treatment doubled at week 8: the dose of treatment was to be doubled at week 8 in the event of non-response to treatment (TC at week 7 > 5.2 mmol/L and TC decrease < 15% from baseline). At week 16, pravastatin lowered TC from 6.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (-13.8%, p < 0.001 versus placebo), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from 4.3 to 3.4 mmol/L (-20.4%, p < 0.001 versus placebo) and slightly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from 1.18 to 1.25 mmol/L (+6.7%). Side effects were similar in both groups. Blood glucose control was not altered as assessed by serial HbAlc measurements which were unchanged during treatment. This study demonstrated that low-dose pravastatin is effective in lowering cholesterol levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and NIDDM.