Does the subscapularis refixation affect the clinical outcome after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an established procedure for patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. However, the refixation of the subscapularis tendon remains a controversial and frequently discussed topic. This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of the subscapularis refixation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Fifty patients (f: 36, m:14) were randomized and assigned to either the "repaired" (rep) or the "not repaired" (nrep) cohort. Intraoperatively, the subscapularis tendon was reattached in the rep-cohort with four tendon-to-tendon sutures, whereas no refixation was performed in the nrep-cohort. The Constant-Murley Score (CS) and the range of motion was evaluated preoperatively as well as 12 and 36 months postoperatively. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and the Lift-off test were performed 36 months postoperatively. The postoperative subscapularis integrity was assessed sonographically. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively the rep-cohort presented better results in the CS (rep: 71 vs. nrep: 66, p: 0.037). The normalized CS was 80% in the rep-cohort and 75% in the nrep-cohort (p: 0.114). At our last follow-up after 36 months we did not find significant differences between the rep-cohort and the nrep-cohort in the CS (rep: 76 vs. nrep: 75, p: 0.285) and normalized CS (rep: 91% vs. nrep: 91%, p: 0.388). Concerning internal rotation (in points) the rep-cohort achieved better results than the nrep-cohort (rep: 7.3 vs. nrep: 6.6, p: 0.040). Flexion (rep: 145° vs. nrep: 151°, p: 0.826), abduction (rep: 135° vs. nrep: 137° p: 0.816), external rotation (rep: 34° vs. nrep: 37°, p: 0.817) and the SSV (rep: 81% vs. nrep: 77%, p: 0.398) presented no significant differences between the cohorts. The ultrasound examination after 36 months displayed an intact tendon in 70%. CONCLUSION: While the subscapularis refixation effects the postoperative internal rotation positively, there were no differences in mid-term follow-up concerning the overall results after rTSA. Further, the external rotation is not affected by the refixation of the subscapularis tendon.

[Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Current Concepts]. / Inverse Schulterendoprothetik ­ aktueller Stand.

Due to first promising long term outcome data, reverse shoulder arthroplasty experienced an immense increase of usage during the past decade. Moreover, the initial Grammont concept has constantly been refined and adapted to current scientific findings. Therefore, clinical and radiological problems like scapular notching and postoperative instability were constantly addressed but do still remain an area of concern.This article summarises current concepts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and gives an overview of actual indications like cuff tear arthropathy, severe osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, tumours, fracture sequelae as well as revision surgery and their corresponding clinical and radiological results.

Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.

BACKGROUND: The two major reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs are the Grammont design and the lateralized design. Even if the lateralized design is biomechanically favored, the classic Grammont prosthesis continues to be used. Functional and subjective patient scores as well as implant survival described in the literature so far are comparable to the lateralized design. A pure comparison of how the RSA design influences outcome in patients has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was a comparison focused on patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). METHODS: We analyzed registry data from 696 CTA patients prospectively collected between 2012 and 2020 in two specialized orthopedic centers up to 2 years post-RSA with the same follow-up time points (6,12 24 months). Complete teres minor tears were excluded. Three groups were defined: group 1 (inlay, 155° humeral inclination, 36 + 2 mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 50)), group 2 (inlay, 135° humeral inclination, 36 + 4 mm lateralized glenosphere (n = 141)) and group 3 (onlay, 145° humeral inclination, + 3 mm lateralized base plate, 36 + 2 mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 35)) We compared group differences in clinical outcomes (e.g., active and passive range of motion (ROM), abduction strength, Constant-Murley score (CS)), radiographic evaluations of prosthetic position, scapular anatomy and complications using mixed models adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: The final analysis included 226 patients. The overall adjusted p-value of the CS for all time-points showed no significant difference (p = 0.466). Flexion of group 3 (mean, 155° (SD 13)) was higher than flexion of group 1 (mean, 142° (SD 18) and 2 (mean, 132° (SD 18) (p < 0.001). Values for abduction of group 3 (mean, 145° (SD 23)) were bigger than those of group 1 (mean, 130° (SD 22)) and group 2 (mean, 118° (SD 25)) (p < 0.001). Mean external rotation for group 3 (mean, 41° (SD 23)) and group 2 (mean, 38° (SD 17)) was larger than external rotation of group 1 (mean, 24° (SD 16)) (p < 0.001); a greater proportion of group 2 (78%) and 3 (69%) patients reached L3 level on internal rotation compared to group 1 (44%) (p = 0.003). Prosthesis position measurements were similar, but group 3 had significantly less scapular notching (14%) versus 24% (group 2) and 50% (group 1) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome scores of different RSA designs for CTA revealed comparable results. However, CTA patients with a lateralized and distalized RSA configuration were associated with achieving better flexion and abduction with less scapular notching. A better rotation was associated with either of the lateralized RSA designs in comparison with the classic Grammont prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Missed Osteochondral Shear Injury of the Humeral Head Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation - A Case Report.

CASE: Two months after anterior shoulder dislocation and spontaneous reduction, a 41-year-old man presented movement-related shoulder pain and a functional deficit. An initially missed osteochondral shearing injury of the humeral head with a Bankart lesion was diagnosed. Due to an extensive posteroinferior defect, an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using bioabsorbable chondral darts was performed. At the 1-year follow-up, magnetic resonance images showed a completely healed osteochondral fragment and the patient presented an unrestricted shoulder function. CONCLUSION: Even in missed osteochondral shear injuries, ORIF with bioabsorbable implants can be associated with an excellent functional outcome and sufficient integrity of the fragment. The absorbable implants are biocompatible, therefore the risk of revision surgery due to implant irritations is minimized.

Arthroscopic Anterior Glenoid Bone Grafting for Shoulder Instability Using an Interconnected Suture Anchor Technique.

Anterior bone grafting is an established and frequently used treatment option for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in combination with significant glenoid bone loss. Several open and arthroscopic fixation techniques have been presented to this field in recent years. Some of these techniques are associated with different peri- and postoperative problems or complications. Therefore, the technical gold standard for anterior bone grafting has not been determined, resulting in an ongoing evolvement of bone-grafting techniques. Arthroscopic, metal-free fixation procedures were introduced to the field bone grafting to overcome previous problems of screw fixation. These metal-free techniques frequently include surgically challenging transglenoidal drilling and are placing anterior soft tissues and neurovascular structures at risk. We therefore present an arthroscopic anterior, PEEK (polyether ether ketone)-anchor based, interconnecting bone-grafting technique bypassing previous challenges to restore the anterior glenoid bone stock with adequate positioning and fixation of the bone graft.

Patient education on subacromial impingement syndrome : Reliability and educational quality of content available on Google and YouTube.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and educational quality of content available on Google and YouTube regarding subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). METHODS: Google and YouTube were queried for English and German results on SAIS using the search terms "shoulder impingement" and the German equivalent "Schulter Impingement". The analysis was restricted to the first 30 results of each query performed. Number of views and likes as well as upload source and length of content were recorded. Each result was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (score range, 0-5) to assess reliability and the DISCERN score (score range, 16-80) and a SAIS-specific score (SAISS, score range, 0-100) to evaluate educational content. RESULTS: The 58 websites found on Google and 48 videos found on YouTube were included in the analysis. The average number of views per video was 220,180 ± 415,966. The average text length was 1375 ± 997 words and the average video duration 456 ± 318 s. The upload sources were mostly non-physician based (74.1% of Google results and 79.2% of YouTube videos). Overall, there were poor results in reliability and educational quality, with sources from doctors having a significantly higher mean reliability measured in the JAMA score (p < 0.001) and educational quality in DISCERN (p < 0.001) and SAISS (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference between German and English results but texts performed significantly better than videos in terms of reliability (p = 0.002) and educational quality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Information on SAIS found on Google and YouTube is of low reliability and quality. Therefore, orthopedic health practitioners and healthcare providers should inform patients that this source of information may be unreliable and make efforts to provide patients with higher quality alternatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Single-row vs. double-row refixation of the subscapularis tendon after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The postoperative integrity of the subscapularis tendon after primary anatomical shoulder arthroplasty has a significant effect on postoperative results. A transosseus Single Row Refixation technique (SRR) has shown up to 30% of partial tears in literature, a modified Double Row Refixation technique (DRR) has biomechanically shown a significantly reduced tear rate, but is yet to be proven in a clinical setting. Thus, we compared the SRR to the DRR technique using clinical outcome parameters and ultrasound examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 patients (40 shoulders; 20f, 16 m; øage: 66 years) were included in our retrospective cohort study. 20 shoulders were treated with the SRR technique (12f, 8 m; FU ø40.9 months) and 20 with the DRR technique (11f, 9 m; FU ø31.6 months). The SRR was performed with three to five transosseus mattress sutures. DRR consisted of two medial placed transosseus sutures and four laterally placed single tendon-to-tendon sutures. The postoperative subscapularis integrity was evaluated by ultrasound examination, the clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant-Murley Score (CS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES). RESULTS: The subscapularis tendon was intact in 14 patients (70%) after SRR, whereas 18 patients (90%) treated with the DRR demonstrated a sonographically intact postoperative subscapularis tendon. The CS was 61.4 points in the SRR cohort and 67.3 points in the DRR cohort (p = 0.314). No significant differences were found in both cohorts preoperative (øSRR: 21.3 points; øDRR: 16.2 points, p = 0.720) and postoperative absolute ASES Scores (øSRR: 70.2 points; øDRR: 73.0 points, p = 0.792). However, the DRR cohort showed a statistical tendency to a higher postoperative ASES increase than the SRR cohort (øSRR-ASES increase: 48.9 points; øDRR-ASES increase: 56.8 points, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that application of the DRR technique can significantly reduce the total rate of postoperative subscapularis tears what effects a clinical tendency towards higher ASES improvements and a better range of motion compared to the SRR technique.

Long-term outcome of arthroscopic debridement of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of low-demand patients with massive rotator cuff tears undergoing arthroscopic debridement in mid- and long-term follow-up, as well as the rate of conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 19 patients with a mean age at surgery of 68 years (range, 55-80 years) from a previously described consecutive cohort and after a mean follow up of 47 month (FU1) and 145 month (FU2). The functional outcome was evaluated with the VAS score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the age- and gender-adjusted Constant (aCS) score. The radiographic outcome was classified according to the Hamada classification. Non-parametric analyses were carried out with the Mann-Whitney U for independent samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for related samples. RESULTS: Five patients (26%) developed symptomatic cuff tear arthropathy and underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty after a mean time of 63 months (range, 45-97 months). These patients were excluded from further analyses. The mean VAS score of the remaining 14 patients at FU1 was significantly lower compared to preoperatively (P = .041), while there were no significant differences between the VAS score at FU1 and FU2 (P = 1.0). The ASES score of the affected shoulder at FU1 was significantly higher compared to prior to surgery (P = .028), while there were no significant differences between the scores of the affected shoulder between FU1 and FU2 (P = .878). While the ASES score of the contralateral shoulder at FU1 was significantly higher than the score of the affected shoulder (P = .038), there were no significant differences in the ASES scores of the affected and the healthy shoulder at FU2 (P = .575). The evaluation of the aCS produced similar results. A progression of the Hamada grade was documented in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic debridement is a safe and valid option for low-demand middle-age or elderly patients with symptomatic massive rotator cuff tears, leading to a significant pain relief and significantly improved functional outcome at mid- and long-term follow up. However, about a quarter of the patients in our cohort had to undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty due to symptomatic cuff tear arthropathy. Furthermore, some of the remaining patients continued to undergo radiographic progression. This might be due to the natural history of their disease and/or the surgical procedure, and the clinical relevance of this finding should be evaluated in further studies.