Change in expressional level and clinicopathological significance of miR-193b-3p in non-small cell lung cancer.

To investigate and analyze changes in the expression level and clinicopathological significance of miR-193b-3p in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the present study, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Targetscan, starBase, and Metastases databases were retrieved for bioinformatics analysis. qRT-PCR was conducted to determine the expression level of miR-193b-3p in the serum or tissues of NSCLC patients. The correlation between the expression level of serum miR-193b-3p and the clinical characteristics of NSCLC patients was analyzed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to assess the diagnostic significance of serum expression of miR-193b-3p in NSCLC. The GEO2R tool was used to analyze the GSE102286 dataset in the GEO database, indicating that miR-193b-3p is one of the overexpressed miRNAs in NSCLC. Databases, such as TargetScan and starBase, were used to predict miR-193b-3p target genes. Finally, 153 target genes were retrieved, and gene ontology (GO) and KEGG analyses were conducted based on the Metascape database, which indicated that all 153 target genes participated in multiple biological processes and signaling pathways closely correlated with the genesis and progression of NSCLC. miR-193b-3p is highly expressed in the serum and cancer tissues of patients with NSCLC. The high miR-193b-3p expression group had a lower degree of cancer differentiation, a higher proportion of late TNM stage, and a greater incidence of lymph node metastasis. ROC curve analysis reported that the area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). High miR-193b-3p expression levels were detected in NSCLC patients and were closely correlated with the degree of malignancy in NSCLC. miR-193b-3p expression levels have a diagnostic effect on NSCLC.

Development and validation of prognostic nomogram for T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer after curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Radical resection plus lymph node dissection is a common treatment for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few models predicted the survival outcomes of these patients. This study aimed to developed a nomogram for predicting their overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 3002 patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC after curative resection between January 1999 and October 2013. 1525 Patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were randomly allocated to training cohort and internal validation cohort in a ratio of 7:3. 1477 patients from ten institutions were recruited as external validation cohort. A nomogram was constructed based on the training cohort and validated by internal and external validation cohort to predict the OS of these patients. The accuracy and practicability were tested by Harrell's C-indexes, calibration plots and decision curve analyses (DCA). RESULTS: Age, sex, histological classification, pathological T stage, and HI standard were independent factors for OS and were included in our nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for OS estimates were 0.671 (95% CI, 0.637-0.705),0.632 (95% CI, 0.581-0.683), and 0.645 (95% CI, 0.617-0.673) in the training cohorts, internal validation cohorts, and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plots and DCA for predictions of OS were in excellent agreement. An online version of the nomogram was built for convenient clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram can predict the OS of patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC after curative resection. The online version of our nomogram offer opportunities for fast personalized risk stratification and prognosis prediction in clinical practice.

A large real-world cohort study of examined lymph node standards for adequate nodal staging in early non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recommend that surgeons sample is not clear. We aimed to define a minimal number of examined lymph nodes for removal or sampling for optimized nodal staging recommendation, with a focus on T1-3N0M0 patients. METHODS: A total of 55,101 consecutive patients were selected, including 52,099 patients with US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data and 3,002 patients in a Chinese multicenter database from 11 thoracic referral centers, who underwent complete resection plus lymph node dissection or sampling for stage T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. Propensity score-matching analysis was performed with R software, and a cut-off value was calculated using X-tile software. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Five-year survival rates with respect to total examined lymph nodes numbers (examined lymph nodes <10 vs. examined lymph nodes ≥10) were 69% and 64% (group A), 66% and 63% (group B), 62% and 58% (group C), 81% and 75% (group D). There were significant differences between examined lymph nodes <10 and examined lymph nodes >10 in each group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A minimum of 10 examined lymph nodes would significantly improve T1-3N0M0 NSCLC prognosis and patients' survival rates if implemented as a minimum standard for lymphadenectomy. Therefore, we recommended a minimum of 10 examined lymph nodes for T1-3N0M0 patients.

A standard for hilar and intrapulmonary lymph node dissection and pathological examination in early non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable variation in the staging of lymph nodes (LNs) as part of tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A new dissection and pathological examination standard for hilar and intrapulmonary LNs needs to be established for patients with early-stage T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. METHODS: This study involved 3,002 patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC who underwent radical lobectomy or total pneumonectomy in the thoracic departments of 11 Chinese institutions between January 1999 and October 2013. The Cox model was applied for univariate and multivariate analyses in the examination of station 10, 11 LN and station 12, 13, 14 LN. A hilar and intrapulmonary standard (HI standard) was then established based on univariate and multiple-factor analyses conducted using the Cox model. RESULTS: Among the 3,002 patients enrolled in the study, 2,609 underwent at least one examination of station 10, 11 LN (A1), while 393 did not undergo examination of station 10, 11 LN (A0). The A0 and A1 groups had 5-year survival rates of 76% and 80%, respectively (P=0.018). Further, 1,764 patients underwent at least one examination of station 12, 13, 14 LN (B1), while 1,238 patients did not (B0). The B0 and B1 groups had 5-year survival rates of 77% and 82%, respectively (P=0.008). In total, 1,269 patients attained the HI standard (C1), and 1,733 did not (C0). The C0 and C1 groups had 5-year survival rates of 77% and 83%, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The HI standard can improve both the prognosis and survival rates of patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC. This will provide important guidance for pulmonary LN dissection and pathological examination in NSCLC cases.

Study of Gefitinib and Pemetrexed as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutation.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of gefitinib and pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients and methods Patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC harboring asensitive EGFR mutation were included in this study and randomly divided into gefitinib + placebo group and gefitinib + pemetrexed group. Pemetrexed or placebo was administered on day 1 at a dose of 500 mg/m(2), and gefitinib was sequentially administered on days 2 ~ 16. This treatment regimen was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression. All investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of gefitinib + pemetrexed group were higher than that of gefitinib + placebo group but only the difference of DCR between two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of gefitinib + placebo group and gefitinib + pemetrexed group were 14.0 months vs. 18 months respectively and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The 2-year PFS rates of gefitinib + pemetrexed group (20.00 %) was higher than that of gefitinib + placebo group (8.89 %) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median overall survival (OS) of gefitinib + placebo group and gefitinib + pemetrexed group were 32.0 months vs. 34 months respectively and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The 3-year OS rates of gefitinib + pemetrexed group (44.44 %) was higher than that of gefitinib + placebo group (35.56 %) but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Major grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. The main grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities were infection, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, fatigue, diarrhea and pneumonitis. The difference of toxicities between two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The combination regimen of gefitinib + pemetrexed used in this study showed a higher ORR and DCR, longer median PFS and acceptable toxicity.