An international Delphi consensus for surgical quality assessment of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis in minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) is a mainstay for curative treatment of patients with gastric cancer. To define and standardize optimal surgical techniques and further improve clinical outcomes through the enhanced MITG surgical quality, there must be consensus on the key technical steps of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis creation, which is currently lacking. This study aimed to determine an expert consensus from an international panel regarding the technical aspects of the performance of MITG for oncological indications using the Delphi method. METHODS: A 100-point scoping survey was created based on the deconstruction of MITG into its key technical steps through local and international expert opinion and literature evidence. An international expert panel comprising upper gastrointestinal and general surgeons participated in multiple rounds of a Delphi consensus. The panelists voted on the issues concerning importance, difficulty, or agreement using an online questionnaire. A priori consensus standard was set at > 80% for agreement to a statement. Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's α. RESULTS: Thirty expert upper gastrointestinal and general surgeons participated in three online Delphi rounds, generating a final consensus of 41 statements regarding MITG for gastric cancer. The consensus was gained from 22, 12, and 7 questions from Delphi rounds 1, 2, and 3, which were rephrased into the 41 statetments respectively. For lymphadenectomy and aspects of anastomosis creation, Cronbach's α for round 1 was 0.896 and 0.886, and for round 2 was 0.848 and 0.779, regarding difficulty or importance. CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi consensus defined 41 steps as crucial for performing a high-quality MITG for oncological indications based on the standards of an international panel. The results of this consensus provide a platform for creating and validating surgical quality assessment tools designed to improve clinical outcomes and standardize surgical quality in MITG.

Laparoscopic Approach to Epiphrenic Diverticula Under Endoscopic Assistance: A Technical Report.

Introduction: Epiphrenic diverticulum is a rare disease caused by mucosa and submucosa herniation through the muscular layers of the esophageal wall. This study presents a case of a patient with a symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum treated with surgery under endoscopic assistance. A review of the literature on this unusual condition was conducted, focusing on the pathogenesis, presentation, and surgical challenges. Methods: A 75-year-old woman who underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) after experiencing worsening dysphagia for food and liquids. The EGD revealed a large epiphrenic diverticulum 36 cm from the upper incisor teeth. The presence of a diverticulum was verified by barium swallow, which revealed a 6 cm diameter epiphrenic diverticulum on the right side of the esophagus. Results: Patient underwent laparoscopic diverticulectomy associated with Heller's myotomy and anterior partial fundoplication. A gastroscope was placed intraoperatively to calibrate the esophagus to prevent stenosis during diverticulectomy, and it was also used to check the integrity of the esophageal wall. The patient tolerated clear liquids on postoperative day 2. Postoperative course was complicated by right pleural effusion and fever managed with antibiotics and pleural drainage. Conclusion: Epiphrenic diverticulectomy in conjunction with management of the underlying motor dysfunction and avoidance of gastroesophageal reflux disease is an effective procedure. Laparoscopy is considered the approach of choice for the majority of patients. Endoscopic assistance during surgery can help the identification of the diverticulum and verify the integrity of the staple line.