Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Technol Int ; 29: 172-180, 2016 Oct 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27728942

RESUMO

Biosurgical materials (biosurgicals) have a wide array of uses for providing hemostasis, including decreasing the risk of postoperative bleeding and, intraoperatively, controling bleeding. These materials are especially useful in situations where electrocautery, sutures, or clips are not feasible. Biosurgicals have long been used in general surgery and surgical subspecialties to provide hemostasis; however, they still are not commonly used during obstetric and gynecologic procedures. Three commonly used classes of biosurgicals will be discussed in this article: oxidized regenerated cellulose, flowables, fibrin sealants, and fibrin sealant patches. Each of these agents has a different role to play during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS), either singularly or in combination with each other. One unique fibrin product is a fibrin sealant patch, which is a combination of products used to treat bleeding of various intensities, including acute, severe hemorrhagic situations. It is important for the MIGS surgeon to understand the nature and use of each product to be able to use biosurgicals appropriately for hemostasis management. This article reviews biosurgical products, their composition, and application in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Included will be a few of the "on label" and "off-label" uses of biosurgicals-either singularly or in combination-and tips for introducing these materials during MIGS procedures.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Feminino , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina , Hemostasia , Hemostáticos , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória , Cirurgiões
2.
Surg Technol Int ; 28: 161-4, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27042775

RESUMO

The use of barbed suture has enabled general and minimally invasive gynecological surgery (MIGS) surgeons to close surgical wounds more efficiently with minimal complications. This article reviews developments in barbed (knotless) sutures and related devices.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/instrumentação , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentação , Suturas , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica
3.
Surg Technol Int ; 27: 169-72, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26680397

RESUMO

As minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) becomes more complex, and cases more difficult, surgeons must adapt to the challenges not only by using innovative equipment but also using the lessons learned from other disciplines. Many years after general surgeons learned the "art of laparoscopy," it is clear that general surgeons in the United States-and those around the world-have surpassed the "masters of laparoscopy" (gynecologists) with their use of new techniques and new equipment. Surgeons are using less traumatic graspers and perform a higher percentage of surgeries laparoscopically than gynecologic surgeons. With the essential need for more integrated ergonomics and a suitable laparoscopic operating room environment, this article describes the benefits of using angled laparoscopes and includes basic techniques to enable gynecologic surgeons to master "driving" the angled laparoscope.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Laparoscópios , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/instrumentação , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA