RESUMO
Study Objectives: Insomnia has profound negative effects on behavioral health, physical health, and functional domains. Leveraging claims data from one of the nation's largest payor-provider systems, the current study examined the real-world prevalence of insomnia, comorbidity of insomnia with behavioral health and other sleep disorders, and the impact of insomnia on total health care costs. Methods: Prevalence and costs associated with insomnia were assessed by examining claims data on approximately 3 million insured members during the year 2022. Using propensity score matching, total health care expenditures were calculated and compared for members with insomnia relative to matched cohorts without insomnia. Generalized linear modeling tested for differences between the cohorts. Results: Nine percent of members were identified as having insomnia; 64% of those also had depression, anxiety, and/or substance use disorder. Median total health care costs among individuals with insomnia were 4-6 times greater than among those without insomnia. A disproportionate amount (21.1%) of total claims spend came from members with insomnia. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate a high degree of clinical need and behavioral health comorbidity associated with insomnia within a large insured cohort. Beyond the clinical significance, the current results demonstrate substantial financial need and opportunity for adequately treating insomnia. This is especially the case for the high proportion of members with insomnia and cooccurring depression, anxiety, and/or substance use disorders. Overall, the findings point to the important role payors and providers may have in promoting greater attention to sleep and insomnia.
RESUMO
Study Objectives: Insomnia has substantial and wide-ranging negative effects on clinical and functional outcomes and on health care expenditures, yet few individuals receive gold-standard insomnia treatment. The current article examines provider and patient outcomes associated with real-world implementation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), as part of a pilot initiative designed to establish initial capability for evidence-based insomnia treatment within one of the largest payor-provider systems in the United States. Methods: Provider training outcomes were assessed using the CBT-I Competency Rating Scale and self-report measures. Patient outcomes were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results: All clinicians (Nâ =â 11) achieved competency in CBT-I and reported large increases in knowledge and confidence related to insomnia and insomnia treatment. Clinicians also reported high intention to deliver CBT-I and significant improvements in overall job satisfaction following competency-based CBT-I training. Among all patients who initiated CBT-I (Nâ =â 48), mixed effects modeling demonstrated significant reduction in average ISI scores (12.57 to 5.88, SEsâ =â 1.08-1.14). More than two-thirds of patients (68.8%) completed treatment. Among completers of this brief treatment, mean insomnia severity improvement was 71% (Hedges gâ =â 1.56). Conclusions: Findings provide support for the feasibility and effectiveness of real-world CBT-I implementation, extending past findings to a private, payor-provider context. Patient and provider-level outcomes suggest the significant opportunity private systems may have in increasing the availability of gold-standard treatment for insomnia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the substantial impact of depression on individuals and healthcare utilization, little is known about the specific relationship between depression severity and total cost of care (TCC). This study evaluates the association between depression symptom severity and TCC and how changes in severity affect TCC. METHODS: The analysis was conducted using insurance claims data and data from electronic health records between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Inclusion criteria comprised insured individuals with coverage during 2019 or 2020, aged one year or older, and identified as having depression in at least one year of the study. Depression symptom severity was assessed using the screening Identification and Stratification (IDS) framework and data available to the research team. The main outcome was TCC per member per month (PMPM) evaluated across the two-year period. RESULTS: Across 2019 and 2020, 744,854 members met inclusion criteria. A total of 369,460 members were studied across both years. Greater depression symptom severity was associated with higher TCC across both years. Unchanged severity was associated with limited change in TCC from 2019 to 2020. Decrease in depression symptoms was associated with an average $41 reduction in PMPM spend, whereas increase in depression symptom severity was associated with an average $608 increase. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include fragmented data, retrospective design that limits causality, and the IDS framework design. CONCLUSION: Changes in depression symptom severity were significantly associated with changes in TCC. Findings reveal financial and clinical opportunities associated with early identification and targeted management of depression.
RESUMO
Patients that incur myocardial disruption from penetrating cardiac injuries have an average 6%-10% expectancy rate of reaching the hospital alive. If prompt recognition on arrival is not immediate, the morbidity and mortality are significantly higher due to the secondary physiologic sequalae of either cardiogenic or hemorrhagic shock. Even after a triumphant arrival at a medical facility, out of that 6%-10%, half of those patients are not expected to survive. The unique significance of the presenting case breaks this tradition, expanding past the paradigms and issuing an exceptional understanding of the protective effects that cardiac surgery can futuristically cause through preformed adhesions. In our case, the cardiac adhesions achieved this by containing a penetrating cardiac injury that had caused complete ventricular disruption.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This is a retrospective nonrandomized cohort study investigating the prevalence, timing, and type of cardiac sarcoidosis indications on electrocardiogram in patients with diagnosed or suspected ocular sarcoidosis. METHODS: Medical histories of individuals seen from 2005 to 2020 at two centers with diagnosed or suspected ocular sarcoidosis were searched, and statistical methods were used to evaluate the relevance of each aspect obtained. RESULTS: Approximately 16% of the individuals in our cohort showed signs of cardiac sarcoidosis on ECG, primarily bundle branch blocks, and premature ventricular contractions, close to the time of their initial ocular sarcoidosis documentation. Males exhibited higher rates of clinically significant extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis. No other demographic differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance for further differentiation of non-infectious sarcoidosis and the utility of electrocardiogram screening. Studies with larger cohorts of ocular sarcoidosis might be needed to elucidate demographic differences within this patient population.
RESUMO
Bamlanivimab-etesevimab and casirivimab-imdevimab are authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration for emergency treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in high-risk persons. There has been no study comparing their clinical efficacy. In this retrospective study of 681 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 during a period dominated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 wild-type and alpha variants, 25 patients (3.7%) had progression to a severe outcome requiring hospitalization and oxygen supplementation within 30 days after monoclonal antibody infusion. Severe outcome was significantly higher among the 181 patients who were treated with casirivimab-imdevimab when compared with the 500 patients who received bamlanivimab-etesevimab (21 [6.6%] vs 13 [2.6%]; P=.01). Patients treated with casirivimab-imdevimab had higher odds of severe outcomes compared with those who received bamlanivimab-etesevimab (odds ratio, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.17 to 6.06). The demographic and clinical characteristics, and the time to monoclonal antibody infusion, of the 2 treatment cohorts were not significantly different. The reason behind this significant difference in the clinical outcomes is unclear, but our observations emphasize potential efficacy differences among antispike monoclonal antibodies against COVID-19. Further clinical studies using larger cohorts of patients are needed to confirm or refute these observations.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: Pulmonary hypertension is a complication of chronic lung diseases (PH-CLD) associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management guidelines for PH-CLD emphasize the treatment of the underlying lung disease, but the role of PH-targeted therapy remains controversial. We hypothesized that treatment approaches for PH-CLD would be variable across physicians depending on the type of CLD and the severity of PH. Methods and Results: Between May and July 2020, we conducted an online survey of PH experts asking for their preferred treatment approach in seven hypothetical cases of PH-CLD of varying severity. We assessed agreement amongst clinicians for initial therapy choice using Fleiss' kappa calculations. Over 90% of respondents agreed that they would treat cases of severe PH in the context of mild lung disease with some form of PH-targeted therapy. For cases of severe PH in the context of severe lung disease, over 70% of respondents agreed to use PH-targeted therapy. For mild PH and mild lung disease cases, <50% of respondents chose to start PH-specific therapy. There was overall poor agreement between respondents in the choice to use mono-, double or triple combination therapy with PH-specific agents in all cases. Conclusion: Although management guidelines discourage the routine use of PH-targeted therapies to treat PH-CLD patients, most physicians choose to treat patients with some form of PH-targeted therapy. The choice of therapy and treatment approach are variable and appear to be influenced by the severity of the PH and the underlying lung disease.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab are authorized for treatment of mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in high-risk patients. We compared the outcomes of patients who received these therapies to identify factors associated with hospitalization and other clinical outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients who received monoclonal antibody from 19 November 2020 to 11 February 2021 were selected and divided into those who received bamlanivimab (nâ =â 2747) and casirivimab-imdevimab (nâ =â 849). The 28-day all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalizations were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The population included 3596 patients; the median age was 62 years, and 50% were female. All had ≥1 medical comorbidity; 55% had multiple comorbidities. All-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalization rates at 28 days were 3.98% and 2.56%, respectively. After adjusting for medical comorbidities, there was no significant difference in all-cause and COVID-19-related hospitalization rates between bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 1.4 [.9-2.2] and 1.6 [.8-2.7], respectively). Chronic kidney, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and immunocompromised status were associated with higher likelihood of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study on the use of bamlanivimab and casirivimab-imdevimab in high-risk patients showed similarly low rates of hospitalization. The number and type of medical comorbidities are associated with hospitalizations after monoclonal antibody treatment.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multimorbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The administration of spike monoclonal antibody treatment to patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 is very challenging. This article summarizes essential components and processes in establishing an effective spike monoclonal antibody infusion program. Rapid identification of a dedicated physical infrastructure was essential to circumvent the logistical challenges of caring for infectious patients while maintaining compliance with regulations and ensuring the safety of our personnel and other patients. Our partnerships and collaborations among multiple different specialties and disciplines enabled contributions from personnel with specific expertise in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, infection prevention and control, electronic health record (EHR) informatics, compliance, legal, medical ethics, engineering, administration, and other critical areas. Clear communication and a culture in which all roles are welcomed at the planning and operational tables are critical to the rapid development and refinement needed to adapt and thrive in providing this time-sensitive beneficial therapy. Our partnerships with leaders and providers outside our institutions, including those who care for underserved populations, have promoted equity in the access of monoclonal antibodies in our regions. Strong support from institutional leadership facilitated expedited action when needed, from a physical, personnel, and system infrastructure standpoint. Our ongoing real-time assessment and monitoring of our clinical program allowed us to improve and optimize our processes to ensure that the needs of our patients with COVID-19 in the outpatient setting are met.
Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , COVID-19 , Procedimentos Clínicos , Terapia por Infusões no Domicílio , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/tendências , Eficiência Organizacional , Terapia por Infusões no Domicílio/métodos , Terapia por Infusões no Domicílio/normas , Humanos , Colaboração Intersetorial , Cultura Organizacional , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/antagonistas & inibidores , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The past 20 years have seen major advances in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension, a disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The 6th World Symposium in Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) took place in February 2018 and attempted to consolidate the current knowledge in the field into practical recommendations to help prioritize an action plan to improve patient outcomes and identify future research directions. In this review, we will summarize the highlights of the 6th WSPH proceedings, including revisions to the hemodynamic definitions and classification of the various types of pulmonary hypertension, genetic advances, approaches to risk stratification, and updated treatment algorithms.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-resuscitation hemodynamic instability following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may occur from myocardial dysfunction underlying cardiogenic shock and/or inflammation-mediated distributive shock. Distinguishing the predominant shock subtype with widely available clinical metrics may have prognostic and therapeutic value. METHODS: A two-hospital cohort was assembled of patients in shock following OHCA. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed via echocardiography or cardiac ventriculography within 1 day post arrest and used to delineate shock physiology. The study evaluated whether higher LVEF, indicating distributive-predominant shock physiology, was associated with neurocognitive outcome (primary endpoint), survival, and duration of multiple organ failures. The study also investigated whether volume resuscitation exhibited a subtype-specific association with outcome. RESULTS: Of 162 patients with post-resuscitation shock, 48% had normal LVEF (> 40%), consistent with distributive shock physiology. Higher LVEF was associated with less favorable neurocognitive outcome (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.94 per 10% increase in LVEF; p = 0.01). Higher LVEF also was associated with worse survival (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97; p = 0.02) and fewer organ failure-free days (ß = - 0.67, 95% CI - 1.28 to - 0.06; p = 0.03). Only 51% of patients received a volume challenge of at least 30 ml/kg body weight in the first 6 h post arrest, and the volume received did not differ by LVEF. Greater volume resuscitation in the first 6 h post arrest was associated with favorable neurocognitive outcome (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.99-2.55 per liter; p = 0.03) and survival (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.04; p = 0.02) among patients with normal LVEF but not low LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: In post-resuscitation shock, higher LVEF-indicating distributive shock physiology-was associated with less favorable neurocognitive outcome, fewer days without organ failure, and higher mortality. Greater early volume resuscitation was associated with more favorable neurocognitive outcome and survival in patients with this shock subtype. Additional studies with repeated measures of complementary hemodynamic parameters are warranted to validate the clinical utility for subtyping post-resuscitation shock.
Assuntos
Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Choque/classificação , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , APACHE , Idoso , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Ressuscitação/métodos , Choque/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologiaRESUMO
RATIONALE: Neurocognitive outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is often poor, even when initial resuscitation succeeds. Lower tidal volumes (Vts) attenuate extrapulmonary organ injury in other disease states and are neuroprotective in preclinical models of critical illness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between Vt and neurocognitive outcome after OHCA. METHODS: We performed a propensity-adjusted analysis of a two-center retrospective cohort of patients experiencing OHCA who received mechanical ventilation for at least the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Vt was calculated as the time-weighted average over the first 48 hours, in milliliters per kilogram of predicted body weight (PBW). The primary endpoint was favorable neurocognitive outcome (cerebral performance category of 1 or 2) at discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 256 included patients, 38% received time-weighted average Vt greater than 8 ml/kg PBW during the first 48 hours. Lower Vt was independently associated with favorable neurocognitive outcome in propensity-adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.28 per 1-ml/kg PBW decrease in Vt; P = 0.008). This finding was robust to several sensitivity analyses. Lower Vt also was associated with more ventilator-free days (ß = 1.78; 95% CI, 0.39-3.16 per 1-ml/kg PBW decrease; P = 0.012) and shock-free days (ß = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.10-2.51; P = 0.034). Vt was not associated with hypercapnia (P = 1.00). Although the propensity score incorporated several biologically relevant covariates, only height, weight, and admitting hospital were independent predictors of Vt less than or equal to 8 ml/kg PBW. CONCLUSIONS: Lower Vt after OHCA is independently associated with favorable neurocognitive outcome, more ventilator-free days, and more shock-free days. These findings suggest a role for low-Vt ventilation after cardiac arrest.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/etiologia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Lesão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A 37-year-old male presented with sharp, severe chest pain following seven days of intravenous injection of crushed morphine tablets. The chest pain was positional and pleuritic in nature and resolved with leaning forward. Work-up was notable for an ECG with inferior and anterolateral PR depressions as well as a CT chest with diffuse centrilobular nodules. Per radiology, the CT findings along with the patient's history were concerning for pulmonary granulomatosis from deposition of talc or some other foreign body. Cardiology was consulted and diagnosed the patient with acute pericarditis, given his typical symptoms and ECG changes. On review of the literature, pulmonary granulomatosis following intravenous injection of foreign bodies is well documented. There are numerous studies documenting foreign body deposition and granulomatosis in organs other than the lungs on post-mortem analyses of individuals with a history of IV injection of crushed tablets. We are suggesting that intravenous injection of crushed morphine tablets can cause pericardial irritation and a syndrome of acuter pericarditis. To our knowledge, there has not been a previous report of acute pericarditis secondary to intravenous injection of crushed tablets.
Assuntos
Dor no Peito/etiologia , Morfina/efeitos adversos , Pericardite/induzido quimicamente , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Ecocardiografia , Corpos Estranhos/complicações , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Masculino , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Pericardite/fisiopatologia , Comprimidos , Talco/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to assess the psychological factors that influence engagement in health behaviors in individuals with chronic pain using a new measure, the Behavioral Engagement Test for Chronic Pain (BET-CP). A secondary aim was to determine preliminary psychometric properties of the BET-CP. SUBJECTS: Participants were 86 adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain recruited from University of Florida pain clinics and the community. METHODS: Participants completed a battery of self-report instruments online, including the BET-CP and measures of related constructs. Items on the BET-CP assessed motivation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and the symptom benefit required to engage across four health behaviors: exercise, diet, sleep, and pain self-management (e.g., relaxation and activity pacing). RESULTS: Participants reported modest expectations of pain-related symptom improvement if they practiced the health behaviors (22-26% improvement), but they required twice that (47-54% improvement) to make it worth their while to commit to practicing them. Participants expected to get the most symptom relief from relaxation and activity pacing, but they were most confident and motivated to eat a healthy diet. In a subsample of participants who provided data for psychometric analysis, the BET-CP demonstrated strong test-retest reliability across 7 days and adequate convergent validity. CONCLUSION: While patients with musculoskeletal pain have outcome expectancies that are nearly in line with research on behavioral pain treatments, their stringent requirements for symptom benefit may impede engagement in the health behaviors recommended for their pain-related symptoms. Additional psychometric study with larger sample sizes is needed to further validate the BET-CP.
RESUMO
The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification is commonly used for staging hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This system assumes the coexistence of cirrhosis; however, a significant proportion of patients with HCC present without cirrhosis. Recently, an alternative system was proposed that stratifies patients according to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level. The aim of this study was to apply the AFP staging system to noncirrhotic patients with HCC and evaluate its ability to predict overall survival (OS). A prospective hepatopancreatobiliary database was reviewed for all patients with a diagnosis of HCC. Patients were staged based on BCLC classification as well as by AFP stage according to four levels: less than 10 ng/mL, 10 to 150 ng/mL, 150 to 500 ng/mL, and greater than 500 ng/mL. Cirrhotic patients were compared with noncirrhotic patients in terms of patient demographics and HCC stage. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of OS was performed for noncirrhotic patients according to BCLC and AFP staging systems. Cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients differed significantly in terms of median age at presentation (64 vs 70 years, P < 0.001) and gender (76 vs 65% male, P = 0.006). BCLS staging classification did not distinguish between cirrhotics and noncirrhotics (P = 0.733), whereas AFP staging demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.0001). KM analysis of OS for noncirrhotic patients with HCC was significant for both the BCLC and the AFP staging systems (P = 0.003 vs P < 0.0001, respectively). Patients presenting with HCC in the absence of cirrhosis appear to have different characteristics than patients with cirrhosis. Staging according to AFP level is an appropriate predictor of prognosis in noncirrhotic patients with HCC.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análise , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Understanding individual differences in the variability of fibromyalgia pain can help elucidate etiological mechanisms and treatment targets. Past research has shown that spatial extent of pain, negative mood, and aftersensation (pain ratings taken after experimental induction of pain) accounts for 40 to 50% of the variance in clinical pain. Poor sleep is hypothesized to have a reciprocal relationship with pain, and over 75% of individuals with fibromyalgia report disturbed sleep. We hypothesized that measures of sleep would increase the predictive ability of the clinical pain model. Measures of usual pain, spatial extent of pain, negative mood, and pain aftersensation were taken from 74 adults with fibromyalgia. Objective (actigraph) and subjective (diary) measures of sleep duration and nightly wake time were also obtained from the participants over 14 days. Hierarchical regression indicated that greater spatial extent (R(2) = .26), higher aftersensation ratings (R(2) = .06), and higher negative mood (R(2) = .04) accounted for 36% of the variance in clinical pain (average of 14 daily pain ratings). None of the sleep variables were significant predictors of clinical pain. Results replicate previous research and suggest that spatial extent of pain, pain aftersensation, and negative mood play important roles in clinical pain, but sleep disturbance did not aid in its prediction. PERSPECTIVE: This study suggests that measures of sleep duration and nightly wake time do not predict fibromyalgia pain at the group level. Fibromyalgia patients may benefit from a 3-pronged approach to pain management: reducing pain's spatial extent, normalization of central nervous system hypersensitivity, and psychobehavioral therapies for negative mood.
Assuntos
Fibromialgia/epidemiologia , Fibromialgia/fisiopatologia , Sono/fisiologia , Adulto , Comorbidade/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
This study explored the current psychological characteristics and criminal behavior history of individuals who retrospectively reported being bullies, bully-victims, victims, or controls (i.e. neither victims nor bullies) during their last 2 years of high school. College students (n = 960) completed measures of criminal thinking, aggression, psychopathy, and criminal behavior online. We predicted bullies and bully-victims would demonstrate the highest scores for criminal thinking, proactive aggression, psychopathy, and have the most criminal infractions. Bullies and bully-victims had significantly higher scores on criminal thinking, aggression, psychopathy, and criminal behaviors than victims or controls. Additionally, men were significantly higher in criminal thinking, aggression, psychopathy, and had more criminal acts than women. There were no gender by bully group interactions. Logistic regression analyses differentiated bully-victims from bullies. Bully-victims tended to be male, higher in criminal thinking, and higher in reactive aggression. In addition, bully-victims were distinct from victims, showing higher criminal thinking and higher proactive aggression.
Assuntos
Agressão/psicologia , Bullying/psicologia , Vítimas de Crime/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Estudantes/psicologia , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Personalidade , Instituições Acadêmicas , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE Initial treatment with antidepressant medication is insufficiently effective in some patients with type 2 diabetes, and factors predicting treatment outcome are poorly understood. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Aggregate data from two published trials were analyzed to determine the rates and predictors of response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy in adults with type 2 diabetes using conventional markers of initial treatment outcome (improvement, response, partial remission, and remission). Three hundred eighty-seven patients who received up to 16 weeks of open-label, acute-phase treatment using bupropion (n = 93) or sertraline (n = 294) were studied. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of poor treatment outcome. Candidate predictors included age, race, sex, initial Beck Depression Inventory (iBDI) score, treatment received (sertraline or bupropion), family history of depression, extant diabetes complications (eDC), and A1C level. RESULTS Of 387 patients initiated on treatment, 330 (85.3%) met criteria for improvement, 232 (59.9%) for response, 207 (53.5%) for partial remission, and 179 (46.3%) for full remission. Significant independent predictors of poor outcome included eDC (for no improvement); sertraline treatment, eDC, and younger age (for nonresponse); sertraline treatment, eDC, and higher iBDI (for failure to partially remit); and younger age and higher iBDI (for failure to fully remit). Higher pain scores predicted three of the four markers of poor outcome in the subset with pain data. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes, poor initial response to antidepressant medication is predicted by multiple factors. Auxiliary treatment of pain and impairment may be required to achieve better outcomes.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/análise , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Prognóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sertralina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether anxiety is associated with poor glycemic control in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. METHOD: MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases were used to locate studies that measured the association of anxiety with glycemic control. Meta-analytic procedures were used to convert the findings to a common metric, compute effect sizes (ES), and statistically analyze the collective data. RESULTS: The search procedures identified 12 studies, 11 (92 percent) of which satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In this overall group, anxiety was not associated with glycemic control (p = 0.19), although the ES was marginally statistically significant (ES = .09, 95 percent CI = 0.04 to 0.14). In studies that determined anxiety from diagnostic interviews, anxiety was associated with hyperglycemia (p = 0.003) and the ES was also statistically significant (ES: 0.25, 95 percent CI = 0.10 to 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: The existing literature suggests that anxiety disorders are associated with hyperglycemia in diabetic patients. Additional studies are required to confirm the magnitude of the relationship, to elucidate moderating and causal factors, and to determine whether successful treatment of anxiety improves glycemic control.