A novel application of multi-event modeling to estimate class segregation in a highly migratory oceanic vertebrate.

Spatial segregation of animals by class (i.e., maturity or sex) within a population due to differential rates of temporary emigration (TE) from study sites can be an important life history feature to consider in population assessment and management. However, such rates are poorly known; new quantitative approaches to address these knowledge gaps are needed. We present a novel application of multi-event models that takes advantage of two sources of detections to differentiate temporary emigration from apparent absence to quantify class segregation within a study population of double-marked (photo-identified and tagged with coded acoustic transmitters) white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in central California. We use this model to test if sex-specific patterns in TE result in disparate apparent capture probabilities (po ) between male and female white sharks, which can affect the observed sex ratio. The best-supported model showed a contrasting pattern of Pr(TE) from coastal aggregation sites between sexes (for males Pr[TE] = 0.015 [95% CI = 0.00, 0.31] and Pr[TE]= 0.57 [0.40, 0.72] for females), but not maturity classes. Additionally, by accounting for Pr(TE) and imperfect detection, we were able to estimate class-specific values of true capture probability (p* ) for tagged and untagged sharks. The best-supported model identified differences between maturity classes but no difference between sexes or tagging impacts (tagged mature sharks p*  = 0.55 (0.46-0.63) and sub-adult sharks p*  = 0.36 (0.25, 0.50); and untagged mature sharks p*  = 0.50 (0.39-0.61) and sub-adults p*  = 0.18 (0.10, 0.31). Estimated sex-based differences in po were linked to sex-specific differences in Pr(TE) but not in p* ; once the Pr(TE) is accounted for, the p* between sexes was not different. These results indicate that the observed sex ratio is not a consequence of unequal detectability and sex-specific values of Pr(TE) are important drivers of the observed male-dominated sex ratio. Our modeling approach reveals complex class-specific patterns in Pr(TE) and p* in a mark-recapture data set, and highlights challenges for the population modeling and conservation of white sharks in central California. The model we develop here can be used to estimate rates of temporary emigration and class segregation when two detection methods are used.

A standard, single dose of inhaled terbutaline attenuates hyperpnea-induced bronchoconstriction and mast cell activation in athletes.

Release of bronchoactive mediators from mast cells during exercise hyperpnea is a key factor in the pathophysiology of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Our aim was to investigate the effect of a standard, single dose of an inhaled ß2-adrenoceptor agonist on mast cell activation in response to dry air hyperpnea in athletes with EIB. Twenty-seven athletes with EIB completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Terbutaline (0.5 mg) or placebo was inhaled 15 min prior to 8 min of eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) with dry air. Pre- and postbronchial challenge, urine samples were analyzed by enzyme immunoassay for 11ß-prostaglandin F2α (11ß-PGF2α). The maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 14 (12-20)% (median and interquartile range) following placebo was attenuated to 7 (5-9)% with the administration of terbutaline (P < 0.001). EVH caused a significant increase in 11ß-PGF2α from 41 (27-57) ng/mmol creatinine at baseline to 58 (43-72) ng/mmol creatinine at its peak post-EVH following placebo (P = 0.002). The rise in 11ß-PGF2α was inhibited with administration of terbutaline: 39 (28-44) ng/mmol creatinine at baseline vs. 40 (33-58) ng/mmol creatinine at its peak post-EVH (P = 0.118). These data provide novel in vivo evidence of mast cell stabilization following inhalation of a standard dose of terbutaline prior to bronchial provocation with EVH in athletes with EIB.

Effect of terbutaline on hyperpnoea-induced bronchoconstriction and urinary club cell protein 16 in athletes.

Repeated injury of the airway epithelium caused by hyperpnoea of poorly conditioned air has been proposed as a key factor in the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in athletes. In animals, the short-acting ß2-agonist terbutaline has been shown to reduce dry airflow-induced bronchoconstriction and the associated shedding of airway epithelial cells. Our aim was to test the efficacy of inhaled terbutaline in attenuating hyperpnoea-induced bronchoconstriction and airway epithelial injury in athletes. Twenty-seven athletes with EIB participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Athletes completed an 8-min eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) test with dry air on two separate days 15 min after inhaling 0.5 mg terbutaline or a matching placebo. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and urinary concentration of the club cell (Clara cell) protein 16 (CC16, a marker of airway epithelial perturbation) were measured before and up to 60 min after EVH. The maximum fall in FEV1 of 17 ± 8% (SD) on placebo was reduced to 8 ± 5% following terbutaline (P < 0.001). Terbutaline gave bronchoprotection (i.e., post-EVH FEV1 fall <10%) to 22 (81%) athletes. EVH caused an increase in urinary excretion of CC16 in both conditions (P < 0.001), and terbutaline significantly reduced this rise (pre- to postchallenge CC16 increase 416 ± 495 pg/µmol creatinine after placebo vs. 315 ± 523 pg/µmol creatinine after terbutaline, P = 0.016). These results suggest that the inhalation of a single therapeutic dose of terbutaline offers significant protection against hyperpnoea-induced bronchoconstriction and attenuates acute airway epithelial perturbation in athletes.

Effects of adjustable and stationary fans with misters on core body temperature and lying behavior of lactating dairy cows in a semiarid climate.

Cows readily seek shade to reduce solar heat load during periods of high ambient temperature. Typically, auxiliary cooling systems are oriented to maximize cooling for shaded cows. However, when a shade structure is oriented north-south, stationary fan and mister cooling systems are unable to track shade as the sun's angle shifts throughout the day, and thus can become ineffective. The FlipFan Dairy Cooling System (Schaefer Ventilation Equipment, Sauk Rapids, MN) employs fans and misters that follow shade and compensate for wind speed by rotating on a horizontal axis. Multiparous, lactating Holstein cows (n=144) on a commercial dairy in Arizona were cooled by a fixed system comprised of stationary fans and misters acting as control or the adjustable FlipFan operated for 16.5 h/d (0830 to 0100 h). Core body temperatures (CBT) of 64 cows (4 pens/treatment; 8 cows/pen; 6d) and lying behavior of 144 cows (4 pens/treatment; 18 cows/pen; 5d) were collected by intravaginal and leg data loggers, respectively. Cows were balanced by milk production, blocked by days in milk, and randomly assigned to pen within block. Pen was the experimental unit. In a second experiment, isothermal maps were developed using a fixed system of thermal data loggers arranged in the shaded areas of the pens at different times of day and were analyzed for differences in the temperature-humidity index (THI) achieved by each cooling treatment. Ambient conditions consisted of a mean temperature of 33.0°C, mean relative humidity of 40.3%, and mean THI of 80.2. Mean 24-h CBT for FlipFan was lower than control (38.9 vs. 39.1±0.04°C). A treatment × time interaction was observed in which CBT of FlipFan was 0.4°C lower than control from 0600 to 0800h and 1500 to 1600h. Cows cooled by FlipFan spent more time lying down compared with those cooled by control (9.5 vs. 8.6 h/d). Cows under FlipFan had more frequent lying bouts than did those under control (12.8 vs. 10.7 bouts/d). Lower CBT and decreased standing time are consistent with the findings of other studies when ambient heat load was reduced. In the second experiment, the FlipFan system achieved a lower THI in the morning and evening (5.9 and 1.7%, respectively), and the THI also tended to be 0.8% lower in the afternoon compared with that of control. Results indicate that FlipFan is more effective than a stationary fan and mister system at decreasing CBT, increasing lying time and bouts, and providing a more desirable microenvironment for cows throughout the day in a semiarid environment.

Effect of inspired air conditions on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and urinary CC16 levels in athletes.

Injury to the airway epithelium has been proposed as a key susceptibility factor for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Our goals were to establish whether airway epithelial cell injury occurs during EIB in athletes and whether inhalation of warm humid air inhibits this injury. Twenty-one young male athletes (10 with a history of EIB) performed two 8-min exercise tests near maximal aerobic capacity in cold dry (4°C, 37% relative humidity) and warm humid (25°C, 94% relative humidity) air on separate days. Postexercise changes in urinary CC16 were used as a biomarker of airway epithelial cell perturbation and injury. Bronchoconstriction occurred in eight athletes in the cold dry environment and was completely blocked by inhalation of warm humid air [maximal fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 18.1 ± 2.1% (SD) in cold dry air and 1.7 ± 0.8% in warm humid air, P < 0.01]. Exercise caused an increase in urinary excretion of CC16 in all subjects (P < 0.001), but this rise in CC16 was blunted following inhalation of warm humid air [median CC16 increase pre- to postchallenge = 1.91 and 0.35 ng/µmol in cold dry and warm humid air, respectively, in athletes with EIB (P = 0.017) and 1.68 and 0.48 ng/µmol in cold dry and warm humid air, respectively, in athletes without EIB (P = 0.002)]. The results indicate that exercise hyperpnea transiently disrupts the airway epithelium of all athletes (not only in those with EIB) and that inhalation of warm moist air limits airway epithelial cell perturbation and injury.

Are asthma-like symptoms in elite athletes associated with classical features of asthma?

BACKGROUND: Asthma is frequent in elite athletes and clinical studies in athletes have found increased airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate asthma-like symptoms, airway inflammation, airway reactivity (AR) to mannitol and use of asthma medication in Danish elite athletes. METHODS: The study group consisted of 54 elite athletes (19 with doctor-diagnosed asthma), 22 non-athletes with doctor-diagnosed asthma (steroid naive for 4 weeks before the examination) and 35 non-athletes without asthma; all aged 18-35 years. Examinations (1 day): questionnaires, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) in parts per billion, spirometry, skin prick test, AR to mannitol and blood samples. Induced sputum was done in subjects with asthma. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in values for eNO, AR and atopy between 42 elite athletes with and 12 without asthma-like symptoms. Elite athletes with doctor-diagnosed asthma had less AR (response dose ratio 0.02 (0.004) vs 0.08 (0.018) p<0.01) and fewer sputum eosinophils (0.8% (0-4.8) vs 6.0% (0-18.5), p<0.01) than non-athletes with doctor-diagnosed asthma. Use of inhaled corticosteroids was similar in the two groups (not significant). In all, 42 elite athletes had asthma-like symptoms but only 12 had evidence of current asthma. Elite athletes without asthma had asthma-like symptoms more frequently than non-athletes without asthma (68.6% vs 25.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Asthma-like symptoms in elite athletes are not necessarily associated with classic features of asthma and alone should not give a diagnosis of asthma. More studies are needed to further investigate if and how the asthma phenotype of elite athletes differs from that of classical asthma.

Treatment of exercise-induced asthma, respiratory and allergic disorders in sports and the relationship to doping: Part II of the report from the Joint Task Force of European Respiratory Society (ERS) and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) in cooperation with GA(2)LEN.

AIM: The aims of part II is to review the current recommended treatment of exercise-induced asthma (EIA), respiratory and allergic disorders in sports, to review the evidence on possible improvement of performance in sports by asthma drugs and to make recommendations for their treatment. METHODS: The literature cited with respect to the treatment of exercise induced asthma in athletes (and in asthma patients) is mainly based upon the systematic review given by Larsson et al. (Larsson K, Carlsen KH, Bonini S. Anti-asthmatic drugs: treatment of athletes and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. In: Carlsen KH, Delgado L, Del Giacco S, editors. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of exercise-related asthma, respiratory and allergic disorders in sports. Sheffield, UK: European Respiratory Journals Ltd, 2005:73-88) during the work of the Task Force. To assess the evidence of the literature regarding use of beta(2)-agonists related to athletic performance, the Task Force searched Medline for relevant papers up to November 2006 using the present search words: asthma, bronchial responsiveness, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, athletes, sports, performance and beta(2)-agonists. Evidence level and grades of recommendation were assessed according to Sign criteria. RESULTS: Treatment recommendations for EIA and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in athletes are set forth with special reference to controller and reliever medications. Evidence for lack of improvement of exercise performance by inhaled beta(2)-agonists in healthy athletes serves as a basis for permitting their use. There is a lack of evidence of treatment effects of asthma drugs on EIA and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in athletes whereas extensive documentation exists in treatment of EIA in patients with asthma. The documentation on lack of improvement on performance by common asthma drugs as inhaled beta(2)-agonists with relationship to sports in healthy individuals is of high evidence, level (1+). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise induced asthma should be treated in athletes along same principles as in ordinary asthma patients with relevance to controller and reliever treatment after careful diagnosis. There is very high level of evidence for the lack of improvement in athletic performance by inhaled beta2-agonists.

Exercise-induced asthma, respiratory and allergic disorders in elite athletes: epidemiology, mechanisms and diagnosis: part I of the report from the Joint Task Force of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) in cooperation with GA2LEN.

AIMS: To analyze the changes in the prevalence of asthma, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and allergies in elite athletes over the past years, to review the specific pathogenetic features of these conditions and to make recommendations for their diagnosis. METHODS: The Task Force reviewed present literature by searching Medline up to November 2006 for relevant papers by the search words: asthma, bronchial responsiveness, EIB, athletes and sports. Sign criteria were used to assess level of evidence and grades of recommendation. RESULTS: The problems of sports-related asthma and allergy are outlined. Epidemiological evidence for an increased prevalence of asthma and BHR among competitive athletes, especially in endurance sports, is provided. The mechanisms for development of asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in athletes are outlined. Criteria are given for the diagnosis of asthma and exercise induced asthma in the athlete. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness is markedly increased in athletes, especially within endurance sports. Environmental factors often contribute. Recommendations for the diagnosis of asthma in athletes are outlined.

Relationship between airway responsiveness to mannitol and to methacholine and markers of airway inflammation, peak flow variability and quality of life in asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to stimuli that cause bronchial smooth muscle (BSM) contraction indirectly through the release of endogenous mediators is thought to reflect airway inflammation more closely compared with AHR measured by stimuli that act directly on BSM. METHODS: Fifty-three adult non-smoking asthmatics (28 females, 18-56 years) who were not taking inhaled steroids were challenged with mannitol (up to 635 mg) and methacholine (up to 8 mumol). Induced sputum eosinophils, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), peak flow variation and clinical severity of asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines were measured in addition to the health-related quality-of-life score using the Juniper asthma quality-of-life questionnaire. FINDINGS: Both AHR to mannitol as well as to methacholine was associated with elevated markers of airway inflammation: in 83% of asthma patients with AHR to mannitol, and in 88% of asthma patients with AHR to methacholine, the eNO level was >20 p.p.b. Sputum% eosinophils >1% was measured in 70% of asthma patients with AHR to mannitol and in 77% of asthma patients with AHR to methacholine. In asthma patients without AHR, 15% had an eNO level >20 p.p.b., but none had sputum% eosinophils >1%. AHR to mannitol was more closely associated with the percentage of sputum eosinophils (PD(15) to mannitol vs. sputum% eosinophils: r: -0.52, P<0.05), compared with AHR to methacholine (PD(20) to methacholine vs. sputum% eosinophils: r: -0.28, NS). Furthermore, there was a stronger correlation between AHR to mannitol and the level of eNO [PD(15) to mannitol vs. eNO (p.p.b.): r: -0.63, P<0.001], compared with AHR to methacholine [PD(20) to methacholine vs. eNO (p.p.b.): r: -0.43, P<0.05]. INTERPRETATION: In asthma patients not being treated with steroids, AHR to mannitol and to methacholine indicated the presence of airway inflammation. AHR to mannitol reflected the degree of airway inflammation more closely when compared with methacholine.

Effect of increasing doses of mannitol on mucus clearance in patients with bronchiectasis.

Bronchiectasis is characterised by hypersecretion and impaired clearance of mucus. A 400-mg dose of inhaled mannitol improves mucus clearance however, the effect of other doses is unknown. A total of 14 patients, aged 63.3+/-5.7 yrs, were studied on five visits. Mucus clearance at baseline and with mannitol (160, 320 and 480 mg) was measured using technetium-99m-sulphur colloid and imaging with a gamma camera over 45 min, followed by a further 30 min involving 100 voluntary coughs. A control study assessed the effect of cough provoked by mannitol during the intervention. Whole right lung clearance over 45 min was 4.7+/-1.2 and 10.6+/-2.6% on baseline and control days, respectively, and increased to 16.7+/-4.2, 22.8+/-4.2 and 31+/-4.7% with 160, 320 and 480 mg mannitol, respectively. Clearance over 45 min with 480 mg mannitol was greater than clearance with 320 and 160 mg. Total clearance over 75 min, after mannitol administration and voluntary coughs, was 36.1+/-5.5, 40.9+/-5.6 and 46.0+/-5.2% with 160, 320 and 480 mg mannitol, respectively, all significantly different from baseline (24.1+/-6.0%) and control (13.1+/-3.0%). Total clearance over 75 min with 480 mg mannitol was greater compared with 160 mg. In conclusion, mucus clearance increases with increasing doses of mannitol and can be further increased by cough in patients with bronchiectasis.

Response to mannitol in asymptomatic subjects with airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial provocation using methacholine, a cholinergic agonist, causes airway narrowing directly by contraction of bronchial smooth muscle. While methacholine has a high sensitivity for identifying airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR), it does not have a high specificity to diagnose asthma and false-positive responses may be observed in non-asthmatics. Mannitol is an osmotic stimulus that acts indirectly to cause airway narrowing by release of endogenous bronchoconstricting mediators. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that subjects with asymptomatic AHR to methacholine would not have AHR to mannitol. METHODS: Sixteen subjects with a methacholine PD(20) <8 micro mol were challenged with mannitol. A positive response to mannitol was defined as a 15% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) after <635 mg (PD(15)). Expired nitric oxide (eNO) and blood eosinophils were also measured. RESULTS: The GM PD(20) for methacholine was 2.25 micro mol [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.19-5.29], the mean eNO was 14.7 p.p.b. (CI: 10.1-19.4) and the eosinophil count was 0.20 x 10(-9)/L (CI: 0.14-0.27 x 10(-9)/L). Only one subject (a smoker, 10 pack-years, FEV(1) 76% pred, non-allergic rhinitis, normal eNO and eosinophil count) also had a mild positive response to mannitol (PD(15): 451 mg). CONCLUSIONS: The response to mannitol was within the normal range in asymptomatic subjects with AHR to methacholine. Further evidence on the responsiveness to mannitol compared with methacholine in a random population sample is required to elucidate whether mannitol is a more specific test for diagnosing asthma.

Visceral leishmaniasis in northern Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) has been well documented by the Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF) VL treatment programmeme in the Tigray region of Ethiopia, but reports are limited from other facilities in this region where this disease continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of VL in a government hospital in Axum, Ethiopia. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 111 patients treated for visceral leishmaniasis. SETTING: Saint Mary's Hospital, Axum, Ethiopia. SUBJECTS: One hundred and Eleven patients treated for visceral leishmaniasis in a government hospital in Axum, Ethiopia. RESULTS: All patients were male and most reported travel history to Humera, a known endemic area. Patients presented with classic signs and symptoms, including fever, weight loss, splenomegaly and anaemia. Almost one third (15/53) of patients who underwent HIV testing had a positive result. Crude death rate at six months was 13.5 per 100 patients (95% CI: 6.7 - 20.3 per 100 patients). Presence of HIV and other co-infections were associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes in this setting were comparable to that of the MSF programmeme in Tigray, Ethiopia and highlight the importance of HIV testing for patients presenting with visceral leishmaniasis.

Inhibition of mast cell PGD2 release protects against mannitol-induced airway narrowing.

Mannitol inhalation increases urinary excretion of 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 (a metabolite of prostaglandin D2 and marker of mast cell activation) and leukotriene E4. The present study tested the hypothesis that beta2-adrenoreceptor agonists and disodium cromoglycate (SCG) protect against mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction by inhibition of mast cell mediator release. Fourteen asthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol (mean dose 252+/-213 mg) in order to induce a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 25%. The same dose was given 15 min after inhalation of formoterol fumarate (24 microg), SCG (40 mg) or placebo. Pre- and post-challenge urine samples were analysed by enzyme immunoassay for 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 and leukotriene E4. The maximum fall in FEV1 of 32+/-10% on placebo was reduced by 95% following formoterol and 63% following SCG. Following placebo, there was an increase in median urinary 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 concentration from 61 to 92 ng.mmol creatinine(-1), but no significant increase in 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 concentration in the presence of either formoterol (69 versus 67 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)) or SCG (66 versus 60 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)). The increase in urinary leukotriene E4 following placebo (from 19 to 31 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)) was unaffected by the drugs. These results support the hypothesis that the drug effect on airway response to mannitol is due to inhibition of mast cell prostaglandin D2 release.

Evidence of mast cell activation and leukotriene release after mannitol inhalation.

The aim of this study was to investigate if mannitol inhalation, as a model of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), causes mast cell activation and release of mediators of bronchoconstriction. Urinary excretion of previously identified mediators of EIB was investigated in association with mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction. Twelve asthmatic and nine nonasthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol and urine was collected 60 min before and for 90 min after challenge. The urinary concentrations of leukotriene (LT)E4, the prostaglandin (PG)D2 metabolite and the mast cell marker 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 were measured by enzyme immunoassay. N(tau)-methylhistamine was measured by radioimmunoassay. In asthmatic subjects, inhalation of a mean+/-SEM dose of 272+/-56 mg mannitol induced a reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 34.5+/-2.1%. This was associated with increases in urinary 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (91.9+/-8.2 versus 66.9+/-6.6 ng x mmol creatinine(-1), peak versus baseline) and LTE4 (51.3+/-7.5 versus 32.9+/-4.7). In nonasthmatic subjects, the reduction in FEV1 was 1.0+/-0.5% after inhaling 635 mg of mannitol. Although smaller than in the asthmatics, significant increases of urinary 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (68.4+/-6.9 versus 56.0+/-5.8 ng x mmol creatinine(-1)) and LTE4 (58.5+/-5.3 versus 43.0+/-3.3 ng x mmol creatinine(-1)) were observed in the nonasthmatic subjects. There was also a small increase in urinary excretion of N(tau)-methylhistamine in the nonasthmatics, but not in the asthmatics. The increased urinary levels of 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 support mast cell activation with release of mediators following inhalation of mannitol. Increased bronchial responsiveness to the released mediators could explain the exclusive bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects.

Relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and adenosine monophosphate.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli is a useful noninvasive tool in the evaluation of asthma and its treatment. We investigated the putative relationship in AHR between inhaled adenosine monophosphate and mannitol. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate atopic asthmatics were evaluated. On two separate screening days, the threshold AMP concentration and threshold mannitol dose to provoke a given fall in FEV1 were measured. RESULTS: For AMP PC20vs. mannitol PD15, the Pearsons correlation coefficient was 0.80, P < 0.001. For AMP PC15vs. mannitol PD15 and AMP PC10vs. mannitol PD10 corresponding values were 0.83, P < 0.001 and 0.68, P = 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: There was a highly significant association between the threshold concentration of AMP and dose of mannitol causing a given fall in FEV1. Further studies are required to evaluate the relationship between inhaled mannitol and other surrogate inflammatory markers.

Indirect airway challenges.

Indirect challenges act by causing the release of endogenous mediators that cause the airway smooth muscle to contract. This is in contrast to the direct challenges where agonists such as methacholine or histamine cause airflow limitation predominantly via a direct effect on airway smooth muscle. Direct airway challenges have been used widely and are well standardised. They are highly sensitive, but not specific to asthma and can be used to exclude current asthma in a clinic population. Indirect bronchial stimuli, in particular exercise, hyperventilation, hypertonic aerosols, as well as adenosine, may reflect more directly the ongoing airway inflammation and are therefore more specific to identify active asthma. They are increasingly used to evaluate the prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and to assess specific problems in patients with known asthma, e.g. exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, evaluation before scuba diving. Direct bronchial responsiveness is only slowly and to a modest extent, influenced by repeated administration of inhaled steroids. Indirect challenges may reflect more closely acute changes in airway inflammation and a change in responsiveness to an indirect stimulus may be a clinically relevant marker to assess the clinical course of asthma. Moreover, some of the indirect challenges, e.g. hypertonic saline and mannitol, can be combined with the assessment of inflammatory cells by induction of sputum.

Effects of mediator antagonism on mannitol and adenosine monophosphate challenges.

BACKGROUND: Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to indirect stimuli is a useful non-invasive surrogate inflammatory marker in the evaluation of asthma, while histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important inflammatory mediators. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate AHR to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli and time taken to recover following single doses of montelukast 10 mg and desloratadine 5 mg in combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatics completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients received encapsulated montelukast 10 mg/desloratadine 5 mg combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo, 10-14 h prior to challenge on two separate occasions. The mannitol threshold dose, AMP threshold concentration and recovery times after challenge were measured along with lung function. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, montelukast/desloratadine conferred improvements (P < 0.05) in adenosine monophosphate (AMP) threshold concentration and mannitol threshold dose: a 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.7-3.3) difference, respectively, while compared to montelukast this amounted to a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-3.4) and 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.1-2.4) improvement, respectively. Montelukast was not significantly different from placebo. Both montelukast/desloratadine and montelukast compared to placebo, shortened recovery following both challenges (P < 0.05): a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 29-min (95% CI 20-36) reduction, respectively, for AMP, and a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 26-min (95% CI 17-35) reduction, respectively for mannitol. CONCLUSION: The dissociated effects of single doses of montelukast alone but not montelukast/desloratadine combination on AHR and recovery time, highlights the relative roles of histamine in initiating the bronchoconstrictor response and cysteinyl leukotrienes in sustaining it. Similar improvements in AHR and recovery time were observed following both indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli.

Effects of terbutaline in combination with mannitol on mucociliary clearance.

Beta2-agonists and osmotic agents stimulate mucociliary clearance (MCC) via different mechanisms which could potentially interact. The effects of inhaling terbutaline in combination with mannitol on MCC were investigated in nine healthy (aged 19+/-1 yrs) and 11 mild (aged 21+/-4 yrs) asthmatic subjects. Using 99mTc-sulphur colloid radioaerosol and a gamma camera, MCC was studied on four separate days with each of the following interventions: 1) terbutaline or its placebo inhaled 10 min before mannitol (in random, double blind); 2) terbutaline inhaled 5 min after mannitol; and 3) terbutaline inhaled 10 min before the control for mannitol. Lung images were collected over a period of 120 min postintervention and over 150 min in total. The mannitol-induced increase in clearance was transiently inhibited by terbutaline pretreatment and transiently enhanced when terbutaline was administered after mannitol both in asthmatic and healthy subjects. The order of administration of mannitol and terbutaline did not affect the total clearance of radioactive mucus over 140 min from the start of intervention in both groups. The pathways through which terbutaline and mannitol increase mucociliary clearance may transiently interact in an inhibitory or synergistic way, depending on the order of administration. However, this did not affect the overall increase in mucociliary clearance over 140 min.

Use of aerosols for bronchial provocation testing in the laboratory: where we have been and where we are going.

Bronchial provocation testing with pharmacological agents that act directly on airway smooth muscle has important limitations. These include the inability to identify exercise-induced asthma (EIA), to differentiate the airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) of airway remodelling from the AHR of active inflammation and to differentiate between doses of steroids. Recent studies show that tests that act indirectly to narrow airways are more sensitive than pharmacological agents for identifying airway inflammation and response to treatment. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is an indirect challenge that acts on mast cells to cause release of mediators. Hypertonic saline is another and, since its development in the 1980s, has become widely used in Australia. Hypertonic (4.5%) saline is used to identify those with active asthma, those with EIA and those who wish to enter certain occupations or sports (e.g., diving). The recent development, again in Australia, of a test that uses dry powder mannitol has promise for use in the laboratory, the office, or for testing in the field. AHR to mannitol identifies people with EIA and is an estimate of its severity. The mannitol response is modified by drugs used to prevent EIA, implying that similar mediators are involved. A mannitol test can be used to monitor response to steroids and is more sensitive than histamine for identifying persistent airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatics well controlled on steroids. These findings suggest that indirect challenges give more useful clinical information about currently active asthma and the response to treatment than direct challenge and they will become more widely used.