RESUMO
Background: The clinical diagnosis of manifest Huntington's disease (HD) relies on a high level of clinical confidence (99% confidence) of HD-consistent motor signs. Longitudinal data have reliably identified cognitive and behavioral dysfunction predating clinical motor diagnosis by up to 15 years. Reliance on motor signs to establish a diagnosis of HD increases risk of early misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Clinical neuropsychologists are uniquely positioned to advise on the clinical application of the Movement Disorder Society Task Force's recently proposed non-motor diagnostic criteria for HD. Objectives: To provide (1) a recommended clinical approach toward non-motor diagnostic criteria in persons with HD and facilitation of accurate diagnosis; (2) recommended practices for medical treatment providers to screen and longitudinally monitor non-motor signs of HD. Methods: The Huntington Study Group re-established the Neuropsychology Working Group, then recruited a multi-disciplinary group of neuropsychologists, neurologists, and psychiatrists to conduct an unstructured literature review and discuss expert opinions on practice, to facilitate an informal consensus opinion to accomplish the objectives. Results: The opinion and an example protocol for medical treatment providers to screen, monitor, and triage non-motor signs and symptoms of Huntington's disease is provided. Conclusions: Clinical diagnosis of non-motor HD is empirically justified and clinically important. Screening and triage by non-neuropsychologist clinicians can aid in detecting and monitoring non-motor Huntington's disease manifestation. The Neuropsychology Working Group consensus advances good clinical practice, clinical research, and quality of life. A companion position paper presenting the details of our consensus opinion regarding evidence-based guidelines for neuropsychological practice is forthcoming.
RESUMO
Objective: Neuropsychological evaluation is critical to detection and management of cognitive and neuropsychiatric changes associated with Huntington disease (HD). Accurate assessment of non-motor complications of HD is critical given the prominent impact on functional disability, frequently commensurate with or exceeding that of motor symptoms. The increasing emphasis on developing disease-modifying therapies targeting cognitive decline in HD requires consensus on clinical neuropsychological assessment methods. The Neuropsychology Working Group (NPWG) of the Huntington Study Group (HSG) sought to provide evidence and consensus-based, practical guidelines for the evaluation of cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with HD. Method: The NPWG recruited a multi-disciplinary group of neuropsychologists, neurologists, and psychiatrists to inform best practices in assessing, diagnosing, and treating the non-motor symptoms in HD. A review was circulated among the NPWG, and in an iterative process informed by reviewed literature, best practices in neuropsychological evaluation of patients with HD were identified. Results: A brief review of the available literature and rational for a clinical consensus battery is offered. Conclusion: Clinical neuropsychologists are uniquely positioned to both detect and characterize the non-motor symptoms in HD, and further, provide neurologists and allied health professions with clinically meaningful information that impacts functional outcomes and quality of life. The NPWG provides guidance on best practices to clinical neuropsychologists in this statement. A companion paper operationalizing clinical application of previous research-based non-motor diagnostic criteria for HD is forthcoming, which also advises on non-motor symptom screening methods for the non-neuropsychologist working with HD.
RESUMO
This article explores sex-specific neurocognitive impairment. It first defines relevant terms such as gender and sex. Next, it describes the nature of the problem including under-representation of women and other gender and sexual minorities in neuroscience research, including cognitive studies. A biopsychosocial framework is employed to account for structural and social determinants of health in sex/gender-specific neurocognitive impairment. Issues in assessment including the use of gender/sex-specific normative data are also discussed. Lastly, the article covers the current state of research as it relates to sex/gender-specific neurocognitive impairment across a range of medical conditions including neurodegenerative diseases and coronavirus disease-2019.
