Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(46): e35841, 2023 Nov 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37986377

RESUMO

Evidence supporting a starting dose of 2 g/day of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) for renal transplantation (RT) is still limited, but maintaining a dose of <2 g could result in worse clinical outcomes in terms of acute rejection (AR). This study aimed to determine the association between AR and infectious and noninfectious complications after RT with a dose of 1.5 g vs 2 g of MMF. A prospective cohort study was performed with a 12-month follow-up of recipients of RT from living donors with low (1.5 g/day) or standard (2 g/day) doses of MMF. The association between adverse effects and complications and doses of MMF was examined using Cox proportional hazard models, and survival free of AR, infectious diseases, and noninfectious complications was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier test. At the end of the follow-up, the incidence of infectious diseases was 52% versus 50% (P = .71) and AR was 5% versus 5% (P = .86), respectively. The survival rate free of gastrointestinal (GI) complications requiring medical attention was higher in the low-dose group than in the standard-dose dose (88% vs 45%, respectively; P < .001). The use of 1.5 g/day of MMF confers a reduction in GI complications without an increase in infectious diseases or the risk of AR.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , México/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Doenças Transmissíveis/etiologia , Hospitais , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 2022: 1363994, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36277469

RESUMO

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with poor outcomes in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Sepsis, direct injury to kidney cells by the virus, and severe systemic inflammation are mechanisms implicated in its development. We investigated the association between inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, and ferritin) in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the development of AKI. Methods: A prospective cohort study performed at the Civil Hospital (Dr. Juan I. Menchaca) Guadalajara, Mexico, included patients aged >18 years with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia confirmed by RT-PCR and who did or did not present with AKI (KDIGO) while hospitalized. Biomarkers of inflammation were recorded, and kidney function was estimated using the CKD-EPI formula. Results: 291 patients were included (68% males; average age, 57 years). The incidence of AKI was 40.5% (118 patients); 21% developed stage 1 AKI, 6% developed stage 2 AKI, and 14% developed stage 3 AKI. The development of AKI was associated with higher phosphate (p = 0.002) (RR 1.39, CI 95% 1.13-1.72), high procalcitonin levels at hospital admission (p = 0.005) (RR 2.09, CI 95% 1.26-3.50), and high APACHE scores (p = 0.011) (RR 2.0, CI 95% 1.17-3.40). The survival analysis free of AKI according to procalcitonin levels and APACHE scores demonstrated a lower survival in patients with procalcitonin >0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.001) and APACHE >15 points (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Phosphate, high procalcitonin levels, and APACHE levels >15 were predictors of AKI development in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Sepse , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , APACHE , SARS-CoV-2 , Pró-Calcitonina , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteína C-Reativa , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Ferritinas , Fosfatos , Lactato Desidrogenases , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA