Tonglian Decoction () arrests the cell cycle in S-phase by targeting the nuclear factor-kappa B signal pathway in esophageal carcinoma Eca109 cells.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anti-tumor activity and molecular mechanism of Tonglian Decoction (, TLD) on esophageal carcinoma Eca109 cells. METHODS: Eca109 cells were treated with TLD and its separated formulae, including the clearing-heat and detoxification formula (Q), activating-blood and promoting-qi formula (H) and nourishing-yin and blood formula (Z). Cell proliferation was measured using the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide assay, cell morphology was observed using a microscope, the cell cycle was measured using flow cytometry and the activity of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signal pathway was detected by Western blot. RESULTS: The half maximal inhibitory concentrations of TLD, Q and H were 386, 771 and 729 mg/L, respectively. TLD, Q and H significantly inhibited cell proliferation, with 69.43%, 60.84% and 61.90% of treated cells in the G phase of the cell cycle. The percentage of cells in S phase increased significantly after treatment with TLD, Q, and H compared with the control group (P<0.05), and TLD showed the strongest effect. Z had no influence on the cell cycle compared with the control group (P>0.05). Western blot detection indicated slight differences in the inhibition of the NF-κB pathway by the different formulae. TLD formula strongly inhibited IKKß, NF-κB, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α expression compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: TLD inhibited Eca109 cell proliferation by arresting cells in S phase. The possible mechanism might be related to inhibiting the NF-κB transduction cascade. The combination of the herbs found in the three separate formulae, H, Q and Z, work synergistically in TLD to produce the inhibitory effects of TLD treatment on Eca109 proliferation.

Nanothermia: A heterogenic heating approach.

AIM OF STUDY: The aim of the study is to show the possible differences on the same temperature and treatment time as control parameter of the variety of local hyperthermia techniques, pointing the possible differences in the local and systemic actions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Debate about the apparent locality of malignancy and the problems of the local treatment. RESULTS: Consider the physiological feedback mechanisms, the spread of temperature, and the time which has active role in the spreading. CONCLUSION: Points that the clinical results depend not only on the temperature but also on the technical solution of the heat delivery.