RESUMO
PURPOSE: Comparison of safety and clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in topical, peribulbar, or general anesthesia. METHODS: Retrospective, post hoc matched study of 346 patients who received DMEK surgery with different types of anesthesia (n = 54 topical, n = 137 peribulbar, n = 155 general anesthesia). Outcome criteria were intraoperative complications, endothelial cell count (ECC), central corneal thickness (CCT) and graft rejection rate, rebubbling rate, and visual acuity (VA). Mean follow-up time was 9.4 ± 2.8 months. RESULTS: The group with topical anesthesia showed intraoperative difficulties such as vitreous pressure (p = 0.01) and difficult graft unfolding (p = 0.4), possibly leading to a higher rebubbling rate (p = 0.03) and therefore graft failure (p = 0.39). However, rebubbling and graft failure occurred more often when the graft preparation was more difficult (p = 0.2, p = 0.13, respectively), which was independent of anesthesia. All three groups achieved comparable functional results regarding VA, ECC, and CCT after 6 months. CONCLUSION: DMEK under topical anesthesia is feasible and shows comparable final visual outcomes but should be limited to selected cooperative patients and performed by experienced surgeons due to the potential for increased intraoperative challenges.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and clinical results of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in topical, peribulbar or general anesthesia. METHODS: This is a retrospective, post hoc matched study of 120 patients having received DMEK surgery with different types of anesthesia (n = 40 topical, n = 40 peribulbar, n = 40 general anesthesia). Endpoint criteria were intraoperative complications, endothelial cell count, central corneal thickness and graft rejection rate, rebubbling rate and best-corrected visual acuity after 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The group with topical anesthesia showed more often intraoperative difficulties such as vitreous pressure (p < 0.05), difficult graft unfolding (p = 0.14) and patient restlessness (p = 0.07). However, all three groups achieved comparable functional visual results after 6 months (p = 0.96). CONCLUSION: DMEK in topical anesthesia is feasible and shows comparable final visual results but should be restricted to selected cooperative patients and performed by experienced surgeons due to possible higher intraoperative challenges.
