Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 16(12): 2738-2749, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38046003

RESUMO

Vitamin K supplementation has been considered recently as a potential treatment for addressing vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the impact of vitamin K supplementation in dialysis patients. Electronic databases were searched for clinical randomized trials among patients treated with vitamin K. Random effects models were performed and risk of bias was evaluated with Cochrane tools and the search was conducted until 15 of September 2023. Eleven trials comprising 830 patients (both adult and pediatric, mainly hemodialysis) compared vitamin K with different controls: lower doses of vitamin K, standard care or placebo. Vitamin K supplementation had no effect on mortality. Vitamin K administration improved vitamin K levels and led to lower levels of dp-uc-MGP and moderately increased calcium levels [0.18 (0.04-0.32)]. Vitamin K1 proved more potency in reducing dp-uc-MGP [SMD -1.64 (-2.05, -1.23) vs. -0.56 (-0.82, -0.31)] and also raised serum vitamin K levels in comparison with vitamin K2 [5.69 (3.43, 7.94) vs. 2.25 (-2.36, 6.87)]. While it did not have a proved benefit in changing calcification scores [-0.14 (-0.37 ± 0.09)], vitamin K proved to be a safe product. There was some concern with bias. Vitamin K supplementation has no impact on mortality and did not show significant benefit in reversing calcification scores. Vitamin K1 improved vitamin K deposits and lowered dp-uc-MGP, which is a calcification biomarker more than vitamin K2. As it proved to be a safe product, additional randomized well-powered studies with improved treatment regimens are needed to establish the true impact of vitamin K in dialysis patients.

2.
J Clin Med ; 12(6)2023 Mar 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36983364

RESUMO

Rates of late allograft loss have improved slowly in the last decades. Well described traditional risk factors that influence allograft survival include cardiovascular events, rejection, infections and post-transplant neoplasia. Here, we critically evaluate the influence of several non-immunological, non-traditional risk factors and describe their impact on allograft survival and cardiovascular health of kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the following risk factors: arterial stiffness, persistent arteriovenous access, mineral bone disease, immunosuppressive drugs residual levels variability, hypomagnesemia, glomerular pathological alterations not included in Banff criteria, persistent inflammation and metabolic acidosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA