Future aspects of botulinum neurotoxins.

The future of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) development is expected to proceed along two lines: the development of novel indications and the development of novel products. New indications will likely be based on the neuromuscular mode of action of BoNTs, as well as action on primary sensory fibers and other neuronal types. Novel BoNT products may be designed for increased specificity or enhanced duration. As new products enter the market, it will be important for each to demonstrate efficacy and safety. Unfortunately, the future of BoNTs will also likely include attempts to obtain and distribute unlicensed and illegal BoNT products that may pose substantial risks to patients.

The structure and mode of action of different botulinum toxins.

The seven serotypes (A-G) of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) are proteins produced by Clostridium botulinum and have multifunctional abilities: (i) they target cholinergic nerve endings via binding to ecto-acceptors (ii) they undergo endocytosis/translocation and (iii) their light chains act intraneuronally to block acetylcholine release. The fundamental process of quantal transmitter release occurs by Ca2+-regulated exocytosis involving sensitive factor attachment protein-25 (SNAP-25), syntaxin and synaptobrevin. Proteolytic cleavage by BoNT-A of nine amino acids from the C-terminal of SNAP-25 disables its function, causing prolonged muscle weakness. This unique combination of activities underlies the effectiveness of BoNT-A haemagglutinin complex in treating human conditions resulting from hyperactivity at peripheral cholinergic nerve endings. In vivo imaging and immunomicroscopy of murine muscles injected with type A toxin revealed that the extended duration of action results from the longevity of its protease, persistence of the cleaved SNAP-25 and a protracted time course for the remodelling of treated nerve-muscle synapses. In addition, an application in pain management has been indicated by the ability of BoNT to inhibit neuropeptide release from nociceptors, thereby blocking central and peripheral pain sensitization processes. The widespread cellular distribution of SNAP-25 and the diversity of the toxin's neuronal acceptors are being exploited for other therapeutic applications.

Using translational medicine to understand clinical differences between botulinum toxin formulations.

When using botulinum toxin-based products, the physician must decide the optimal location and dose required to alleviate symptoms and improve the patient's quality of life. To deliver effective treatment, the physician needs to understand the importance of accurate target muscle selection and localization and the implications of each product's migration properties when diluted in different volumes. Pre-clinical mouse models of efficacy and safety have been utilized to compare local and distal muscle relaxation effects following defined intramuscular administration. Data from the model allow the products to be ranked based on their propensity for local efficacy versus their distal migration properties. Using standardized dilutions, the non-parallel dose-response curves for the various formulations demonstrate that they have different efficacy profiles. Distal effects were also noted at different treatment doses, which are reflected in the different safety and/or therapeutic margins. Based on these pre-clinical data, the safety and therapeutic margin rankings are ordered, largest to smallest, as BOTOX, Dysport and Myobloc. The results of subsequent clinical trials are variable and dose comparisons are inconclusive, thus supporting the regulatory position that the dose units of the individual preparations are unique and cannot be simply converted between products.

[Potential antinociceptive mechanisms of botulinum toxin]. / Mögliche antinozizeptive Mechanismen von Botulinumtoxin.

Botulinum toxin has been used in pain therapy for several years. Its application in migraine and headaches is particularly interesting. Clinical results have not yet been definitely conclusive, and a uniform model of the mode of action has not been established either. Apart from a purely muscular effect, a direct antinociceptive effect of botulinum toxin has been found in patients, in the preclinical model, and in a clinical pain model. This is contradicted by negative observations in the clinical model of pain, which might be related to methodological deficits. Further basics need to be worked out before arriving at any final result. Clinical studies with patients and pain models should then follow. Studying botulinum toxin within the context of pain will also provide many new insights into pain therapy in general. In which pain model botulinum toxin may play a role in the future, has to be awaited.

Botulinum neurotoxin - from laboratory to bedside.

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has been used clinically since 1980, with an ever-increasing range of clinical applications. This has coincided with a period of massively expanded interest in the underlying biology of the neurotoxin. Tremendous advances have taken place in the scientific understanding of neurotoxin structure and function since the description of their endopeptidase activity in 1992. These developments have led to an increased understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the clinical use of the neurotoxins and also in the technologies available to support their clinical use. The expanding range of clinical applications, and use in increasing doses, has also generated challenges for the clinicians and manufacturers of BoNT preparations to ensure continuing efficacy and safety margins for these new clinical settings. To date the increased clinical use of BoNTs has occurred largely empirically, and not by application of the recent insights into neurotoxin structure and function. With the increased knowledge regarding the biology of the neurotoxins, however, there is the opportunity to select preferred forms of the toxin for particular clinical applications and even to consider engineering the neurotoxins to produce modified products more suited to specific clinical applications. These developments and opportunities that have arisen, particularly over the last decade, emphasise the increasing need to maintain an active two way dialogue between clinicians and basic scientists to ensure that the advances in the laboratory are translated into clinical benefit and that the clinical developments in use of neurotoxin are supported by the scientific research activity. This article is based upon presentations given in a workshop at the 5th International Conference on Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Botulinum and Tetanus Toxin in Denver in June, 2005 seeking to address issues relating to the laboratory/clinic interface.

Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinociceptive action of botulinum toxin type A.

Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) has been used to treat pathological pain conditions although the mechanism is not entirely understood. Subcutaneous (s.c.) BOTOX also inhibits inflammatory pain in the rat formalin model, and the present study examined whether this could be due to a direct action on sensory neurons. BOTOX (3.5-30 U/kg) was injected s.c. into the subplantar surface of the rat hind paw followed 1-5 days later by 50 mL of 5% formalin. Using microdialysis, we found that BOTOX significantly inhibited formalin-induced glutamate release (peak inhibitions: 35%, 41%, and 45% with 3.5, 7, and 15 U/kg, respectively). BOTOX also dose dependently reduced the number of formalin-induced Fos-like immunoreactive cells in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and significantly (15 and 30 U/kg) inhibited the excitation of wide dynamic range neurons of the dorsal horn in Phase II but not Phase I of the formalin response. These results indicate that s.c. BOTOX inhibits neurotransmitter release from primary sensory neurons in the rat formalin model. Through this mechanism, BOTOX inhibits peripheral sensitization in these models, which leads to an indirect reduction in central sensitization.

A comparison of the safety margins of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, B, and F in mice.

This study compared the respective intramuscular (IM) safety margins of two preparations of botulinum toxin (BTX) serotype A and one preparation each of BTX serotypes B and F in mice. Mice received an IM injection (0-200 U kg(-1) body weight) of BTX-A (BOTOX or DYSPORT), an experimental preparation of BTX-B (WAKO Chemicals, Inc.), or an experimental preparation of BTX-F (WAKO). An observer who was masked to treatment scored muscle weakness using the Digit Abduction Scoring (DAS) assay. Peak DAS responses were plotted and IM ED(50) values calculated. The safety margin for each BTX preparation was calculated as a ratio of the IM median lethal dose after hind limb injection to the median effective dose in the DAS assay (IM LD(50)/IM ED(50)). Experiments were repeated 4-6-times for each preparation (10 mice/dose). Mean safety margin values were highest for BTX-F (WAKO; 16.7+/-3.9) and one of the BTX-A preparations (BOTOX; 13.9+/-1.7). Mean safety margins values for the other BTX-A preparation (DYSPORT) and BTX-B (WAKO) were significantly lower (7.6+/-0.9 and 4.8+/-1.1, respectively). Thus, the BTX preparations exhibited different safety margins in mice. These results support the hypothesis that the preparations are unique therapeutics and are not interchangeable based on a simple dose ratio.

Pharmacology and immunology of botulinum toxin serotypes.

Botulinum toxin preparations can provide patients with a therapeutic modality that may improve both their medical condition and quality of life. The mechanism of action of the various botulinum toxin preparations and serotypes is similar: they all block neurotransmitter release. The majority of clinical conditions treated are based upon the targeted temporary chemodenervation of the selected organ. The antinociceptive effects of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A), based on preclinical studies and clinical experiences in treating movement disorders and other painful conditions, will also be reviewed to illustrate how this compound may act as it alleviates the discomfort associated with various conditions. Chronic therapies with preparations with the lowest amount of neurotoxin protein provide the best chance for long-term therapy by minimizing the potential of the patient to form neutralizing antibodies. Differences in formulations or serotypes impart unique efficacy and safety profiles and thus does not support a simple dose ratio conversion between products.

Botulinum toxin type A and other botulinum toxin serotypes: a comparative review of biochemical and pharmacological actions.

Botulinum toxin type A is an important therapeutic agent for the treatment of movement and other disorders. As the clinical uses of botulinum toxin type A expand, it is increasingly important to understand the biochemical and pharmacological actions of this toxin, as well as those of other botulinum toxin serotypes (B-G). Botulinum neurotoxin serotypes exhibit differences in neurotoxin complex protein size, percentage of neurotoxin in the activated or nicked form, intracellular protein target, and potency. These properties differ even between preparations that contain the same botulinum toxin serotype due to variations in product formulations. As demonstrated in preclinical and clinical studies, these differences result in a unique combination of efficacy, duration of action, safety, and antigenic potential for each botulinum neurotoxin preparation.

Recommendations for the use of botulinum toxin type A in the management of cerebral palsy.

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is increasingly being used for the treatment of childhood spasticity, particularly cerebral palsy. However, until very recently, all such use in this indication has been unapproved with no generally accepted treatment protocols, resulting in considerable uncertainty and variation in its use as a therapeutic agent. In view of the increasing awareness of, and interest in, this approach to the treatment of spasticity, and also the recent licensing in a number of countries of a BTX-A preparation for treating equinus deformity in children, it would seem timely to establish a framework of guidelines for the safe and efficacious use of BTX-A for treating spasticity in children. This paper represents an attempt, by a group of 15 experienced clinicians and scientists from a variety of disciplines, to arrive at a consensus and produce detailed recommendations as to appropriate patient selection and assessment, dosage, injection technique and outcome measurement. The importance of adjunctive physiotherapy, orthoses and casting is also stressed.

Functional repair of motor endplates after botulinum neurotoxin type A poisoning: biphasic switch of synaptic activity between nerve sprouts and their parent terminals.

Blockade of acetylcholine release by botulinum neurotoxin type A at the neuromuscular junction induces the formation of an extensive network of nerve-terminal sprouts. By repeated in vivo imaging of N-(3-triethyl ammonium propyl)-4-(4-(dibutylamino)styryl) pyridinium dibromide uptake into identified nerve endings of the mouse sternomastoid muscle after a single intramuscular injection of the toxin, inhibition of stimulated uptake of the dye at the terminals was detected within a few days, together with an increase in staining of the newly formed sprouts. After 28 days, when nerve stimulation again elicited muscle contraction, regulated vesicle recycling occurred only in the sprouts [shown to contain certain soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment proteins (SNAREs) and to abut acetylcholine receptors] and not at the parent terminals. Therefore, only these sprouts could be responsible for nerve-muscle transmission at this time. However, a second, distinct phase of the rehabilitation process followed with a return of vesicle turnover to the original terminals, accompanied by an elimination of the by then superfluous sprouts. This extension and later removal of "functional" sprouts indicate their fundamental importance in the repair of paralyzed endplates, a finding with ramifications for the vital process of nerve regeneration.

Synthesis of chiral and achiral pyranenamine derivatives. Potent agents with topical ocular antiallergic activity.

The SS, RR and meso stereoisomers of pyranenamine SK&F 84210 were synthesized stereospecifically starting from commercially available (R)-(-)- or (S)-(+)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4-methanol. In addition, two achiral pyranenamines 19 and 26 were also synthesized. When evaluated by intravenous and topical routes in the rat passive ocular anaphylaxis (POA) assay, (SS)- and meso-2 as well as achiral compounds 19 and 26 were found to be more potent antiallergic agents than (RR)-2.

Cadmium and the reticuloendothelial system (RES). A specific defect in blood clearance of soluble aggregates of IgG by the liver in mice given cadmium.

The ability of the reticuloendothelial system (RES) to bind and catabolize soluble stable heat aggregates of 125I-IgG (A-IgG) was studied in mice given oral cadmium. Cadmium caused a delay in the circulation clearance of A-IgG in intact animals. The defect was due to impaired liver uptake of A-IgG and correlated with increased liver cadmium. Subsequent catabolism of bound A-IgG by liver slices was not affected. The defect was specific in that clearance of aggregated human serum albumin and colloidal carbon was normal in cadmium mice; this suggests that cadmium may affect either Fc or complement receptors of Kupffer cells in liver.