Contribution of the factors to EuroQol 5 Dimensions in rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving low disease activity/remission with abatacept treatment: post-hoc subgroup analyses of the Japanese real-world observational "ORIGAMI" study.

OBJECTIVES: To address improvements in quality of life (QOL), we analysed the relative contributions of factors to EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in abatacept-treated rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the ORIGAMI study. METHODS: Patients who were evaluable for disease activity through to Week 52 in the ORIGAMI study were divided into those achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index-remission/low disease activity (remission/LDA; n=178) and patients with moderate/high disease activity (MDA/HDA; n=99). We compared the changes in EQ-5D and other outcomes through to Week 52. Focusing on the remission/LDA group, the contribution of each factor to the variance of EQ-5D at baseline and Week 52 was examined using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The remission/LDA group showed greater improvements than the MDA/HDA group in EQ-5D, Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain (Pain VAS), and patient global assessment (PtGA). In the remission/LDA group, factors significantly contributing to EQ-5D were sex, C-reactive protein, and Pain VAS at baseline, and PtGA and age at Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients who achieved remission/LDA during abatacept treatment, PtGA and age at Week 52 contribute to the variance of EQ-5D, suggesting that identification of factors associated with PtGA may be important to address improvements of QOL.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective: We compared the 52-week effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) and abatacept (ABT) in patients with RA in a real-world setting and investigated a role of human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) in the effectiveness. Methods: RA patients starting TOF (n = 187) and ABT (n = 183) were enrolled. Effectiveness was compared after reducing the selection bias to a minimum using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores. The influence of SE alleles on effectiveness was compared within each treatment group. A treatment group comparison was also performed within SE-positive and SE-negative groups. Results: Herpes zoster and some laboratory abnormalities were more frequent in the TOF group than in the ABT group. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between treatment groups after adjustments with IPTW. The TOF group had a significantly higher proportion of DAS in 28 joints using ESR (DAS28-ESR) remission at week 52 than the ABT group. The DAS28-ESR at week 12 and thereafter was not affected by the copy number of SE alleles in the TOF group, but decreased significantly as the copy number increased in the ABT group. In SE-positive patients, remission and drug retention rates did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. In SE-negative patients, the TOF group showed significantly higher remission and drug retention rates than the ABT group. Conclusion: The present results suggest that TOF is more effective with regard to remission at week 52 based on treatment responses in SE-negative RA patients.

Effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous abatacept in biologic-naïve RA patients at Week 52: A Japanese multicentre investigational study (ORIGAMI study).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abatacept over 52 weeks in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate disease activity in the prospective, 5-year, observational study (ORIGAMI study) in Japan. METHODS: Abatacept (125 mg) was administered subcutaneously once a week. Clinical outcomes included Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission at Week 52 (primary endpoint), Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ), EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D), treatment retention, and safety. The results were compared with those of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) controls from the ongoing Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry. RESULTS: Overall, 325 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 66.9 ± 12.7 years. The proportion of patients achieving SDAI remission (≤3.3) at Week 52 was 18.9% (95% CI: 14.3-23.6) and low disease activity (≤11) was 53.3% (95% CI: 47.4-59.1). A significant improvement was observed in J-HAQ and EQ-5D over 52 weeks in both the abatacept and csDMARD groups. The probability of abatacept treatment retention at Week 52 was 69.9% (95% CI: 64.7-75.5). Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in 50.0% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept significantly improved disease activity, physical disability, and quality of life for up to 52 weeks in RA patients in a real-world setting.

Impact of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope on responses to treatment with tofacitinib or abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tofacitinib and abatacept and clarify the impact of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) on responses to these treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: After adjustments by propensity score matching, 70 out of 161 patients receiving tofacitinib and 70 out of 131 receiving abatacept were extracted. The clinical effectiveness of both drugs over 24 weeks and the impact of the copy numbers of SE on effectiveness outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: The percentage of patients in remission in the 28-joint count disease activity score using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) did not significantly differ between patients receiving tofacitinib and abatacept at week 24 (32% vs 37%, p = 0.359). The mean change at week 4 in DAS28-ESR from baseline was significantly greater in patients receiving tofacitinib than in those receiving abatacept (- 1.516 vs - 0.827, p = 0.0003). The percentage of patients in remission at week 4 was 30% with tofacitinib and 15% with abatacept (p = 0.016). When patients were stratified by the copy numbers of SE alleles, differences in these numbers did not affect DAS28-ESR scores of patients receiving tofacitinib. However, among patients receiving abatacept, DAS28-ESR scores were significantly lower in patients carrying 2 copies of SE alleles than in those carrying 0 copies at each time point throughout the 24-week period. Furthermore, the percentage of patients in remission with DAS28-ESR at week 24 was not affected by the copy numbers of SE alleles in patients receiving tofacitinib (p = 0.947), whereas it significantly increased as the copy numbers became higher in patients receiving abatacept (p = 0.00309). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed a correlation between the presence of SE and DAS28-ESR remission in patients receiving abatacept (OR = 25.881, 95% CI = 3.140-213.351, p = 0.0025), but not in those receiving tofacitinib (OR = 1.473, 95% CI = 0.291-7.446, p = 0.639). CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical effectiveness of tofacitinib and abatacept was similar at week 24, tofacitinib was superior to abatacept for changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR and the achievement of remission at week 4. SE positivity was associated with the achievement of DAS28-ESR remission by week 24 in patients receiving abatacept, but not in those receiving tofacitinib.

The efficacy of mizoribine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and its correlation with renal function.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between the efficacy of mizoribine (MZR) and the factors that might effect MZR concentration: renal function and dosage and administration of MZR in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The efficacy of MZR treatment was prospectively evaluated in 97 RA regardless of dosage, at the 14 participated institutions. The Disease Activity Score 28-CRP3 was used to assess RA activity. The renal function was evaluated based on the serum creatinine and serum cystatin-C (Cys-C). The patients were followed up for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The patients with a mean age 66.2 years included 18 male. The renal function assessment showed increased creatinine in 16.4% of patients and increased Cys-C in 54.5%, suggesting the higher sensitivity of Cys-C to detect impaired renal function than creatinine. In patients with good or moderate response according to the European League against Rheumatism classification criteria, the Cys-C was significantly higher compared with those with no response. MZR treatment was significantly more effective in patients with an arithmetic product of the single MZR dose used and Cys-C of 179 or more. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of MZR may increase in proportion to its single dose, or increased Cys-C level in patients with impaired renal function.

[A case of rheumatoid arthritis with acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 69-year-old male was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis(RA) in 1994. Good control of the RA activity had been obtained with sodium aurothiomalate (GST). However, polyarthritis reappeared in January 2003. He was examined at the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saitama Social Insurance Hospital in August 2003. The treatment was switched from GST to salazosulfapyridine (SASP), with improvement of the polyarthritis. Subsequently, in March 2005, the patient developed fever, pancytopenia and liver dysfunction, and was admitted to Saitama Social Insurance Hospital. Since these abnormalities were suspected to be caused by SASP, this drug was stopped and prednisolone (PSL) was started at 10 mg/day. However, since the fever, pancytopenia and liver dysfunction persisted, bone marrow examination was performed and the patient was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pre B cell type, L2). He was transferred to the Division of Hematology, Omiya Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, on 8(th) April, 2005 for induction chemotherapy. Although the induction therapy needed to be stopped because the patient developed dysphagia and biliary system dysfunction, complete remission (CR) was confirmed. It was difficult to restart chemotherapy in the patient because his general condition remained poor, with repeated episodes of aspiration pneumonia and newly detected stomach cancer. He was, therefore, transferred back to Saitama Social Insurance Hospital on 28(th) September, 2005. The ALL remained in CR and the RA activity had disappeared without therapy, but the patient died of pneumonia on 1(st) August, 2006.