Wait Time Advantage for Transplant Candidates With HIV Who Accept Kidneys From Donors With HIV Under the HOPE Act.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with HIV face higher mortality on the waitlist compared with candidates without HIV. Because the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act has expanded the donor pool to allow donors with HIV (D + ), it is crucial to understand whether this has impacted transplant rates for this population. METHODS: Using a linkage between the HOPE in Action trial (NCT03500315) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 324 candidates listed for D + kidneys (HOPE) compared with 46 025 candidates not listed for D + kidneys (non-HOPE) at the same centers between April 26, 2018, and May 24, 2022. We characterized KT rate, KT type (D + , false-positive [FP; donor with false-positive HIV testing], D - [donor without HIV], living donor [LD]) and quantified the association between HOPE enrollment and KT rate using multivariable Cox regression with center-level clustering; HOPE was a time-varying exposure. RESULTS: HOPE candidates were more likely male individuals (79% versus 62%), Black (73% versus 35%), and publicly insured (71% versus 52%; P < 0.001). Within 4.5 y, 70% of HOPE candidates received a KT (41% D + , 34% D - , 20% FP, 4% LD) versus 43% of non-HOPE candidates (74% D - , 26% LD). Conversely, 22% of HOPE candidates versus 39% of non-HOPE candidates died or were removed from the waitlist. Median KT wait time was 10.3 mo for HOPE versus 60.8 mo for non-HOPE candidates ( P < 0.001). After adjustment, HOPE candidates had a 3.30-fold higher KT rate (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.30, 95% confidence interval, 2.14-5.10; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Listing for D + kidneys within HOPE trials was associated with a higher KT rate and shorter wait time, supporting the expansion of this practice for candidates with HIV.

Myelosuppression-sparing treatment of central nervous system nocardiosis in a multiple myeloma patient utilizing a tedizolid-based regimen: a case report.

Central nervous system (CNS) nocardiosis is a recognised opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients. Treatment involves prolonged institution of antibiotics, making oral agents a convenient and desired option. Unfortunately, devising an effective, well-tolerated antimicrobial for the duration required to treat CNS nocardiosis is challenging owing to treatment intolerance and toxicities. This report highlights myelosuppression-sparing treatment with an oral tedizolid-based regimen following a complicated course with standard agents. A 68-year-old female from Florida (USA) with low-risk lambda light chain multiple myeloma complicated by persistently low CD4 counts, absolute neutrophil counts and IgG levels presented 18 months after diagnosis with fever, pneumonia, new-onset atrial fibrillation, right-sided hemiparesis, encephalopathy and slurred speech. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed numerous ring-enhancing lesions, and blood cultures were positive for Nocardia farcinica. The patient failed initial therapy with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), linezolid and imipenem plus surgical debridement of the frontal lobe abscess. Intraoperative cultures were positive for N. farcinica. The treatment course was also complicated by steadily declining white blood cell and platelet counts despite receiving filgrastim. She was therefore placed on SXT and tedizolid for 6 months. Subsequent brain MRI showed complete resolution of the lesions and thus chemotherapy for multiple myeloma was re-initiated. In conclusion, tedizolid-based regimens may be an option for patients with myelosuppression requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy for CNS nocardiosis.