Association of Adverse Clinical Outcomes With Peri-Infarct Ischemia Detected by Stress Cardiac Magnetic Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Early invasive revascularization guided by moderate to severe ischemia did not improve outcomes over medical therapy alone, underlying the need to identify high-risk patients for a more effective invasive referral. CMR could determine the myocardial extent and matching locations of ischemia and infarction. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate if CMR peri-infarct ischemia is associated with adverse events incremental to known risk markers. METHODS: Consecutive patients were included in an expanded cohort of the multicenter SPINS (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States) study. Peri-infarct ischemia was defined by the presence of any ischemic segment neighboring an infarcted segment by late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Primary outcome events included acute myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, whereas secondary events included any primary events, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure hospitalization, and late coronary artery bypass surgery. RESULTS: Among 3,915 patients (age: 61.0 ± 12.9 years; 54.7% male), ischemia, infarct, and peri-infarct ischemia were present in 752 (19.2%), 1,123 (28.8%), and 382 (9.8%) patients, respectively. At 5.3 years (Q1-Q3: 3.9-7.2 years) of median follow-up, primary and secondary events occurred in 406 (10.4%) and 745 (19.0%) patients, respectively. Peri-infarct ischemia was the strongest multivariable predictor for primary and secondary events (HRadjusted: 1.72 [95% CI: 1.23-2.41] and 1.71 [95% CI: 1.32-2.20], respectively; both P < 0.001), adjusted for clinical risk factors, left ventricular function, ischemia extent, and infarct size. The presence of peri-infarct ischemia portended to a >6-fold increased annualized primary event rate compared to those with no infarct and ischemia (6.5% vs 0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Peri-infarct ischemia is a novel and robust prognostic marker of adverse cardiovascular events.

Heart Failure with Normal Natriuretic Peptide Levels and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Clinical and Cardiac MRI Study.

Purpose To describe the clinical presentation, comprehensive cardiac MRI characteristics, and prognosis of individuals with predisposed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study (part of MISSION-HFpEF [Multimodality Imaging in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Risk Stratification of HFpEF]; NCT04603404) was conducted from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021, and included individuals with suspected HFpEF who underwent cardiac MRI. Participants who had primary cardiomyopathy and primary valvular heart disease were excluded. Participants were split into a predisposed HFpEF group, defined as HFpEF with normal natriuretic peptide levels based on an HFA-PEFF (Heart Failure Association Pretest Assessment, Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide, Functional Testing, and Final Etiology) score of 4 from the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines, and an HFpEF group (HFA-PEFF score of ≥ 5). An asymptomatic control group without heart failure was also included. Clinical and cardiac MRI-based characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary end points were death, heart failure hospitalization, or stroke. Results A total of 213 participants with HFpEF, 151 participants with predisposed HFpEF, and 100 participants in the control group were analyzed. Compared with the control group, participants with predisposed HFpEF had worse left ventricular remodeling and function and higher systemic inflammation. Compared with participants with HFpEF, those with predisposed HFpEF, whether obese or not, were younger and had higher plasma volume, lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation, lower left atrial volume index, and less impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (-12.2% ± 2.8 vs -13.9% ± 3.1; P < .001) and early-diastolic global longitudinal strain rate (eGLSR, 0.52/sec ± 0.20 vs 0.57/sec ± 0.15; P = .03) but similar prognosis. Atrial fibrillation occurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.90; P = .009), hemoglobin level (HR = 0.94; P = .001), and eGLSR (per 0.2-per-second increase, HR = 0.28; P = .002) were independently associated with occurrence of primary end points in participants with predisposed HFpEF. Conclusion Participants with predisposed HFpEF showed relatively unique clinical and cardiac MRI features, warranting greater clinical attention. eGLSR should be considered as a prognostic factor in participants with predisposed HFpEF. Keywords: Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, Normal Natriuretic Peptide Levels, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Strain, Prognosis Clinical trial registration no. NCT04603404 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

CMR provides comparable measurements of diastolic function as echocardiography.

Clinical application of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is expanding but CMR assessment of LV diastolic function is still being validated. The purpose of this study was to validate assessments of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) using CMR by comparing with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed on the same day. Patients with suspected or diagnosed cardiomyopathy (n = 63) and healthy volunteers (n = 24) were prospectively recruited and included in the study. CMR diastolic parameters were measured on cine images and velocity-encoded phase contrast cine images and compared with corresponding parameters measured on TTE. A contextual correlation feature tracking method was developed to calculate the mitral annular velocity curve. LV DD was classified by CMR and TTE following 2016 guidelines. Overall DD classification was 78.1% concordant between CMR and TTE (p < 0.0001). The trans-mitral inflow parameters correlated well between the two modalities (E, r = 0.78; A, r = 0.90; E/A, r = 0.82; all p < 0.0001) while the remaining diastolic parameters showed moderate correlation (e', r = 0.64; E/e', r = 0.54; left atrial volume index (LAVi), r = 0.61; all p < 0.0001). Classification of LV diastolic function by CMR showed good concordance with standardized grades established for TTE. CMR-based LV diastolic function may be integrated in routine clinical practice.Name of the registry: Technical Development of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Trial registration number: NCT00027170. Date of registration: November 26, 2001. URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00027170.

Long-term outcomes prediction in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by cardiac MRI.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore imaging features including tissue characterization and myocardial deformation in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and investigate its prognostic value for adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with HFpEF who underwent cardiac MRI between January 2010 and December 2016 were enrolled. Feature-tracking (FT) analysis and myocardial fibrosis were assessed by cardiac MRI. Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to determine the association between MRI variables and primary outcomes. Primary outcomes were all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 335 enrolled patients with HFpEF, 191 had diabetes mellitus (DM) (mean age: 58.7 years ± 10.8; 137 men). During a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 91 diabetic HFpEF and 56 non-diabetic HFpEF patients experienced primary outcomes. DM was a significant predictor of worse prognosis in HFpEF. In diabetic HFpEF, the addition of conventional imaging variables (left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume index, extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) resulted in a significant increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (from 0.693 to 0.760, p < 0.05). After adjustment for multiple clinical and imaging variables, each 1% worsening in GLS was associated with a 9.8% increased risk of adverse events (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic HFpEF is characterized by more severely impaired strains and myocardial fibrosis, which is identified as a high-risk HFpEF phenotype. In diabetic HFpEF, comprehensive cardiac MRI provides incremental value in predicting prognosis. Particularly, MRI-FT measurement of GLS is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in diabetic HFpEF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our findings suggested that MRI-derived variables, especially global longitudinal strain, played a crucial role in risk stratification and predicting worse prognosis in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, which could assist in identifying high-risk patients and guiding therapeutic decision-making. KEY POINTS: • Limited data are available on the cardiac MRI features of diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, including myocardial deformation and tissue characterization, as well as their incremental prognostic value. • Diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients was characterized by more impaired strains and myocardial fibrosis. Comprehensive MRI, including tissue characterization and global longitudinal strain, provided incremental value for risk prediction. • MRI served as a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical management in diabetic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.