Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(6): 2625-2636, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492032

RESUMO

Neonates face heightened susceptibility to drug toxicity, often exposed to off-label medications with dosages extrapolated from adult or pediatric studies. Premature infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) are particularly at risk due to underdeveloped pharmacokinetics and exposure to multiple drugs. The study aimed to survey commonly used medications with a higher risk of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity in Spanish and Italian neonatal units. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in Italian and Spanish neonatal units using a web-based survey with 43 questions. A modified Delphi method involved experts refining the survey through online consensus. Ethical approval was obtained, and responses were collected from January to July 2023. The survey covered various aspects, including drug-related ototoxic and nephrotoxic management, hearing screening, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Responses from 131 participants (35.9% from Spain and 64.1% from Italy) revealed awareness of drug toxicity risks. Varied practices were observed in hearing screening protocols, and a high prevalence of ototoxic and nephrotoxic drug use, including aminoglycosides (100%), vancomycin (70.2%), loop diuretics (63.4%), and ibuprofen (62.6%). Discrepancies existed in guideline availability and adherence, with differences between Italy and Spain in therapeutic drug monitoring practices. CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the need for clinical guidelines and uniform practices in managing ototoxic and nephrotoxic drugs in neonatal units. Awareness is high, but inconsistencies in practices indicate a necessity for standardization, including the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring and the involvement of clinical pharmacologists. Addressing these issues is crucial for optimizing neonatal care in Southern Europe. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neonates in intensive care face a high risk of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity from drugs like aminoglycosides, vancomycin, loop diuretics, and ibuprofen. • Therapeutic drug monitoring is key for managing these risks, optimizing dosing for efficacy and minimizing side effects. WHAT IS NEW: • NICUs in Spain and Italy show high drug toxicity awareness but differ in ototoxic/nephrotoxic drug management. • Urgent need for standard guidelines and practices to address nephrotoxic risks from aminoglycosides, vancomycin, loop diuretics, and ibuprofen.


Assuntos
Aminoglicosídeos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Ototoxicidade , Vancomicina , Humanos , Itália , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha , Aminoglicosídeos/efeitos adversos , Ototoxicidade/etiologia , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ibuprofeno/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio e Potássio/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Feminino , Nefropatias/induzido quimicamente , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino
2.
Ital J Pediatr ; 49(1): 117, 2023 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmia neonatorum is an acute conjunctivitis that occurs in newborns within the first month of life. The most serious infections are due to Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, that may cause permanent damages. The use of ophthalmic prophylaxis varies widely around the world, according to the different health and socio-economic contexts. To date in Italy there is no a clear legislation regarding ophthalmia neonatorum prophylaxis at birth. METHODS: We invited all birth centers in Italy to carry out a retrospective survey relating the last three years. We collected data regarding demographics of neonates, drugs used for ophthalmic prophylaxis and results of the screening of pregnant women for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae vaginal infections. RESULTS: Among 419 birth centers, 302 (72,1%) responded to the survey. Overall 1041384 neonates, 82,3% of those born in the three years considered, received ophthalmic prophylaxis. Only 4,585 (0,4%) of them received one of the drugs recommended by the WHO. The Centers that participated to the survey reported 12 episodes of Chlamydial conjunctivitis and no Gonococcal infection in the three years. Only 38% of the Centers performed vaginal swabs to pregnant women: 2,6% screened only for Neisseria, 9,6% only for Chlamydia and 25,8% for both germs. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained from the survey showed a low incidence of neonatal conjunctivitis due to either Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis in Italy. Due to the lack of legislation regulating the prophylaxis of ophthalmia neonatorum in newborns, the Italian Society of Neonatology, the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine have recently issued new recommendations on this topic.


Assuntos
Conjuntivite , Gonorreia , Oftalmia Neonatal , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Oftalmia Neonatal/epidemiologia , Oftalmia Neonatal/prevenção & controle , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Gonorreia/prevenção & controle , Itália/epidemiologia
3.
Microorganisms ; 12(1)2023 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38276184

RESUMO

There is currently no worldwide agreement on the real need to administer conjunctival antibiotics to neonates at birth to prevent neonatal conjunctivitis (usually defined as ophthalmia neonatorum) by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Therefore, there is wide variability in antibiotic administration, conditioned mainly by the social and health context. In Italy, a law enacted in 1940 required doctors and midwives to administer ophthalmic prophylaxis with 2% silver nitrate to all newborns at birth. This law was repealed in 1975 and since then there has been no clear guidance on the use of ophthalmia neonatorum prophylaxis at birth. Since neonatal conjunctivitis caused by C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae is not reported, we carried out a nationwide survey of 1,041,384 neonates across all Italian birth centers to evaluate the incidence of ophthalmia neonatorum and the current practice of prophylaxis. After analyzing the results, we formulated an intersociety position statement on the prevention of ophthalmia neonatorum to update and standardize this prevention strategy in Italy.

4.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 988681, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36090551

RESUMO

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving support for cardio-respiratory function. Over the last 50 years, the extracorporeal field has faced huge technological progress. However, despite the improvements in technique and materials, coagulation problems are still the main contributor to morbidity and mortality of ECMO patients. Indeed, the incidence and survival rates of the main hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in neonatal respiratory ECMO are relevant. The main culprit is related to the intrinsic nature of ECMO: the contact phase activation. The exposure of the human blood to the non-endothelial surface triggers a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, which chronically activates the thrombin generation and ultimately leads to coagulative derangements. Pre-existing illness-related hemostatic dysfunction and the peculiarity of the neonatal clotting balance further complicate the picture. Systemic anticoagulation is the management's mainstay, aiming to prevent thrombosis within the circuit and bleeding complications in the patient. Although other agents (i.e., direct thrombin inhibitors) have been recently introduced, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the standard of care worldwide. Currently, there are multiple tests exploring ECMO-induced coagulopathy. A combination of the parameters mentioned above and the evaluation of the patient's underlying clinical context should be used to provide a goal-directed antithrombotic strategy. However, the ideal algorithm for monitoring anticoagulation is currently unknown, resulting in a large inter-institutional diagnostic variability. In this review, we face the features of the available monitoring tests and approaches, mainly focusing on the role of point-of-care (POC) viscoelastic assays in neonatal ECMO. Current gaps in knowledge and areas that warrant further study will also be addressed.

5.
Front Pediatr ; 7: 479, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31799228

RESUMO

Background: Recent explorative studies suggest that propranolol reduces retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) progression, but the short-term effects of propranolol treatment at 1 year of corrected age have not been extensively evaluated. Methods: A multi-center retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to assess the physical development and the refractive outcome of infants with prior ROP treated with propranolol. Forty-nine infants treated with propranolol were compared with an equal number of patients who did not receive any propranolol therapy and represent the control group, with comparable anthropometrical characteristics and stages of ROP. Results: The weight, length, and head circumference at 1 year of corrected age were similar between infants who had been treated, or not, with propranolol, without any statistically significant differences. Refractive evaluation at 1 year showed spherical equivalent values decreasing with the progression of ROP toward more severe stages of the disease, together with an increasing number of infants with severe myopia. On the contrary, no differences were observed between infants who had been treated with propranolol and those who had not. Conclusion: This study confirms that the progression of ROP induces an increase of refractive errors and suggests that propranolol itself does not affect the refractive outcome. Therefore, if the efficacy of propranolol in counteracting ROP progression is confirmed by further clinical trials, the conclusion will be that propranolol might indirectly improve the visual outcome, reducing the progression of ROP.

6.
Front Pediatr ; 7: 180, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31134171

RESUMO

Background: Oral propranolol reduces retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) progression, although not safely. Propranolol 0.1% eye micro-drops administered to newborns with stage 2 ROP are well-tolerated, but not sufficiently effective. Methods: A multi-center open-label trial was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of propranolol 0.2% eye micro-drops in newborns with stage 1 ROP. The progression of the disease was evaluated with serial ophthalmologic examinations. Hemodynamic, respiratory, biochemical parameters, and propranolol plasma levels were monitored. Demographic and perinatal characteristics, co-morbidities and co-intervention incidences, together with ROP progression, were compared with a historical control group in the same centers participating in the trial. Results: Ninety-eight newborns were enrolled and compared with the historical control group. Populations were not perfectly homogeneous (as demonstrated by the differences in the Apgar score and the different incidence rate in surfactant administration and oxygen exposure). The progression to ROP stage 2 or 3 plus was significantly lower than the incidence expected on the basis of historical data (Risk Ratio 0.521, 95% CI 0.297- 0.916). No adverse effects related to propranolol were observed and the mean propranolol plasma level was significantly lower than the safety cut-off of 20 ng/mL. Unexpectedly, three newborns treated with oral propranolol before the appearance of ROP, showed a ROP that was unresponsive to propranolol eye micro-drops and required laser photocoagulation treatment. Conclusion: Propranolol 0.2% eye micro-drops were well-tolerated and appeared to reduce the ROP progression expected on the basis of a comparison with a historical control group. Propranolol administered too early appears to favor a more aggressive ROP, suggesting that a ß-adrenoreceptor blockade is only useful during the proliferative phase. Further randomized placebo-controlled trials are required to confirm the current results. Clinical Trial Registration  The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with Identifier NCT02504944 and with EudraCT Number 2014-005472-29.

7.
BMC Pediatr ; 17(1): 165, 2017 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28709412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) still represents one of the leading causes of visual impairment in childhood. Systemic propranolol has proven to be effective in reducing ROP progression in preterm newborns, although safety was not sufficiently guaranteed. On the contrary, topical treatment with propranolol eye micro-drops at a concentration of 0.1% had an optimal safety profile in preterm newborns with ROP, but was not sufficiently effective in reducing the disease progression if administered at an advanced stage (during stage 2). The aim of the present protocol is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of propranolol 0.2% eye micro-drops in preterm newborns at a more precocious stage of ROP (stage 1). METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, phase II, clinical trial, planned according to the Simon optimal two-stage design, will be performed to analyze the safety and efficacy of propranolol 0.2% eye micro-drops in preterm newborns with stage 1 ROP. Preterm newborns with a gestational age of 23-32 weeks, with a stage 1 ROP will receive propranolol 0.2% eye micro-drops treatment until retinal vascularization has been completed, but for no longer than 90 days. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters will be continuously monitored. Blood samplings checking metabolic, renal and liver functions, as well as electrocardiogram and echocardiogram, will be periodically performed to investigate treatment safety. Additionally, propranolol plasma levels will be measured at the steady state, on the 10th day of treatment. To assess the efficacy of topical treatment, the ROP progression from stage 1 ROP to stage 2 or 3 with plus will be evaluated by serial ophthalmologic examinations. DISCUSSION: Propranolol eye micro-drops could represent an ideal strategy in counteracting ROP, because it is definitely safer than oral administration, inexpensive and an easily affordable treatment. Establishing the optimal dosage and treatment schedule is to date a crucial issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02504944, registered on July 19, 2015, updated July 12, 2016. EudraCT Number 2014-005472-29.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Soluções Oftálmicas/uso terapêutico , Propranolol/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Protocolos Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Pediatr Res ; 81(2): 307-314, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27814346

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oral propranolol reduces retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) progression, although not safely. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of propranolol eye micro-drops in preterm newborns with ROP. METHODS: A multicenter open-label trial, planned according to the Simon optimal two-stage design, was performed to analyze safety and efficacy of propranolol micro-drops in newborns with stage 2 ROP. To this end, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored, and blood samples were collected weekly, for 3 wk. Propranolol plasma levels were also monitored. The progression of the disease was evaluated with serial ophthalmologic examinations. RESULTS: Twenty-three newborns were enrolled. Since the fourth of the first 19 newborns enrolled in the first stage of the study showed a progression to stage 2 or 3 with plus, the second stage was prematurely discontinued. Even though the objective to complete the second stage was not achieved, the percentage of ROP progression (26%) was similar to that obtained previously with oral propranolol administration. However, no adverse effects were observed and propranolol plasma levels were significantly lower than those measured after oral administration. CONCLUSION: Propranolol 0.1% eye micro-drops are well tolerated, but not sufficiently effective. Further studies are required to identify the optimal dose and administration schedule.


Assuntos
Propranolol/administração & dosagem , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oftálmica , Administração Oral , Administração Tópica , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Neovascularização Fisiológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Segurança do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Propranolol/sangue , Respiração
9.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 92(1): 2-20, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617889

RESUMO

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a disease that can cause blindness in very low birthweight infants. The incidence of ROP is closely correlated with the weight and the gestational age at birth. Despite current therapies, ROP continues to be a highly debilitating disease. Our advancing knowledge of the pathogenesis of ROP has encouraged investigations into new antivasculogenic therapies. The purpose of this article is to review the findings on the pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to the transition between the first and second phases of ROP and to investigate new potential therapies. Oxygen has been well characterized for the key role that it plays in retinal neoangiogenesis. Low or high levels of pO2 regulate the normal or abnormal production of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), which are the predominant regulators of retinal angiogenesis. Although low oxygen saturation appears to reduce the risk of severe ROP when carefully controlled within the first few weeks of life, the optimal level of saturation still remains uncertain. IGF-1 and Epo are fundamentally required during both phases of ROP, as alterations in their protein levels can modulate disease progression. Therefore, rhIGF-1 and rhEpo were tested for their abilities to prevent the loss of vasculature during the first phase of ROP, whereas anti-VEGF drugs were tested during the second phase. At present, previous hypotheses concerning ROP should be amended with new pathogenetic theories. Studies on the role of genetic components, nitric oxide, adenosine, apelin and ß-adrenergic receptor have revealed new possibilities for the treatment of ROP. The genetic hypothesis that single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the ß-ARs play an active role in the pathogenesis of ROP suggests the concept of disease prevention using ß-blockers. In conclusion, all factors that can mediate the progression from the avascular to the proliferative phase might have significant implications for the further understanding and treatment of ROP.


Assuntos
Retinopatia da Prematuridade/fisiopatologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Fator 1 Induzível por Hipóxia/metabolismo , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso , Oxigênio/fisiologia , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/metabolismo , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo
10.
J Pediatr ; 163(6): 1570-1577.e6, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24054431

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of oral propranolol administration in preterm newborns affected by an early phase of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-two preterm newborns with Stage 2 ROP were randomized to receive oral propranolol (0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg/6 hours) added to standard treatment or standard treatment alone. To evaluate safety of the treatment, hemodynamic and respiratory variables were continuously monitored, and blood samples were collected weekly to check for renal, liver, and metabolic balance. To evaluate efficacy of the treatment, the progression of the disease (number of laser treatments, number of bevacizumab treatments, and incidence of retinal detachment) was evaluated by serial ophthalmologic examinations, and plasma soluble E-selectin levels were measured weekly. RESULTS: Newborns treated with propranolol showed less progression to Stage 3 (risk ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.47-0.58, relative reduction of risk 48%) or Stage 3 plus (relative risk 0.42 95% CI 0.31-0.58, relative reduction of risk 58%). The infants required fewer laser treatments and less need for rescue treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (relative risk 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.79, relative reduction of risk 52 %), a 100% relative reduction of risk for progression to Stage 4. They also had significantly lower plasma soluble E-selectin levels. However, 5 of the 26 newborns treated with propranolol had serious adverse effects (hypotension, bradycardia), in conjunction with episodes of sepsis, anesthesia induction, or tracheal stimulation. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that the administration of oral propranolol is effective in counteracting the progression of ROP but that safety is a concern.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Propranolol/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Propranolol/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Método Simples-Cego
11.
BMC Pediatr ; 10: 83, 2010 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21087499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite new therapeutic approaches have improved the prognosis of newborns with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), an unfavourable structural and functional outcome still remains high. There is high pressure to develop new drugs to prevent and treat ROP. There is increasing enthusiasm for anti-VEGF drugs, but angiogenic inhibitors selective for abnormal blood vessels would be considered as an optimal treatment.In an animal experimental model of proliferative retinopathy, we have recently demonstrated that the pharmacological blockade of beta-adrenoreceptors improves retinal neovascularization and blood retinal barrier breakdown consequent to hypoxia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the propranolol administration in preterm newborns suffering from a precocious phase of ROP in terms of safety and efficacy in counteracting the progression of retinopathy. METHODS/DESIGN: Preterm newborns (gestational age at birth lower than 32 weeks) with stage 2 ROP (zone II-III without plus) will be randomized, according to their gestational age, to receive propranolol added to standard treatment (treatment adopted by the ETROP Cooperative Group) or standard treatment alone. Propranolol will be administered until retinal vascularization will be completely developed, but not more than 90 days. Forty-four participants will be recruited into the study. To evaluate the safety of propranolol administration, cardiac and respiratory parameters will be continuously monitored. Blood samplings will be performed to check renal, liver and metabolic balance. To evaluate the efficacy of propranolol, the progression of the disease, the number of laser treatments or vitrectomies, the incidence of retinal detachment or blindness, will be evaluated by serial ophthalmologic examinations. Visual function will be evaluated by means of behavioural standardized tests. DISCUSSION: This pilot study is the first research that explores the possible therapeutic role of beta blockers in ROP. The objective of this research is highly ambitious: to find a treatment simple, inexpensive, well tolerated and with few adverse effects, able to counteract one of the major complications of the prematurity. Any favourable results of this research could open new perspectives and original scenarios about the treatment or the prevention of this and other proliferative retinopathies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18523491; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01079715; EudraCT Number 2010-018737-21.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Propranolol/uso terapêutico , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacocinética , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Seguimentos , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Projetos Piloto , Propranolol/administração & dosagem , Propranolol/farmacocinética , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/sangue , Retinopatia da Prematuridade/diagnóstico , Retinoscopia , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Acta Paediatr ; 97(6): 751-3, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18397350

RESUMO

AIMS: Bilirubin is a newly discovered modulator of the gut barrier in vitro and in vivo. We studied the effect of bilirubin on the serosal to mucosal intestinal permeability in vivo. We also investigated the prevalence of cow's milk protein intolerance (CMPI) in infants with moderate hyperbilirubinemia versus matched controls. METHODS: Faecal alpha 1 antitrypsin (a1AT) was used to monitor intestinal protein loss; a large cohort was prospectively followed for 12 months for sign and symptoms of CMPI. RESULTS: Neonates with hyperbilirubinemia had higher stool excretion of a1AT than controls (0.68 +/- 0.28 mg/g vs. 0.25 +/- 0.11 mg/g; p < 0.01). Faecal a1AT correlates with total serum bilirubin (TSB) (r = 0.85; p < 0.01). Also, in the first 12 months of life, formerly hyperbilirubinemic infants had an higher prevalence of CMPI (14/353 vs. 4/339; chi2= 4.018, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia increases stool protein loss and is also a mild risk factor for CMPI.


Assuntos
Bilirrubina/sangue , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal/complicações , Absorção Intestinal , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/etiologia , Proteínas do Leite/efeitos adversos , alfa 1-Antitripsina/metabolismo , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Bovinos , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal/fisiopatologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Intolerância à Lactose/etiologia , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/fisiopatologia , Permeabilidade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Acta Paediatr ; 94(2): 197-200, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15981754

RESUMO

AIM: To compare, in a prospective clinical trial, oxygen delivery on intermittent positive pressure with nasal cannulae versus facial mask in primary resuscitation of the newborn with moderate asphyxia. METHODS: 617 neonates with moderate asphyxia at birth were randomized: 303 were resuscitated by oxygen on intermittent positive pressure with nasal cannuale and 314 neonates by mask. Resuscitation followed the Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics, 3rd edition. RESULTS: Resuscitation through the nasal route less frequently requires chest compressions and intubations (26 neonates needed chest compression and 20 needed intubation out of 314 resuscitated by mask; five neonates needed chest compression and two needed intubation out of 303 resuscitated by nasal cannulae). Apgar scores, admission rates to neonatal intensive care units, air-leak syndromes, birthweight, gestational age, use of prenatal steroids and deaths did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Oxygen delivery on intermittent positive pressure with nasal cannulae in primary resuscitation of the newborn with moderate asphyxia is a less aggressive and potentially advantageous alternative to the traditional oral route.


Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva Intermitente/instrumentação , Ressuscitação/instrumentação , Análise de Variância , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Respiração com Pressão Positiva Intermitente/métodos , Masculino , Máscaras , Cavidade Nasal , Ressuscitação/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA