Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29784242

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The active transcutaneous bone conduction implant Bonebridge®, is indicated for patients affected by bilateral conductive/mixed hearing loss or unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, showing hearing outcomes similar to other percutaneous bone conduction implants, but with a lower rate of complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the hearing outcomes in a series of 26 patients affected by conductive or mixed hearing loss and treated with Bonebridge®. METHODS: 26 of 30 patients implanted with Bonebridge® between October 2012 and May 2017, were included in the study. We compared the air conduction thresholds at the frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000Hz, the SRT50% and the percentage of correct answers at an intensity of 50dB with and without the implant. RESULTS: "Pure tone average" with the implant was 34.91dB showing an average gain of 33.46dB. Average SRT 50% with the implant was 34.33dB, whereas before the surgery no patient achieved 50% of correct answers at a sound intensity of 50dB. The percentage of correct answers at 50dB changed from 11% without the implant to 85% with it. We only observed one complication consisting of an extrusion of the implant in a patient with a history of 2 previous rhytidectomies. CONCLUSIONS: The hearing outcomes obtained in our study are similar to those published in the literature. Bonebridge® represents an excellent alternative in the treatment of conductive or mixed hearing loss, and with a lower rate of complications.


Assuntos
Condução Óssea , Prótese Ancorada no Osso , Perda Auditiva Bilateral/reabilitação , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista/reabilitação , Adulto , Idoso , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Limiar Auditivo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes de Discriminação da Fala , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28965618

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is the most common peripheral vertigo disease. The aim of this paper is to review the results obtained with the different specific particle repositioning manoeuvres, evaluating the possible risk factors linked to a poorer prognosis. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-six patients with a diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo were reviewed retrospectively, of whom 150 had vertigo of the posterior canal, 20 had vertigo of the horizontal canal, 3 had vertigo of the superior canal, and 3 had a double vertigo. The Epley manoeuvre was used to treat the posterior and superior canals, and Lempert manoeuvre was used to treat the horizontal canal. An imaging study by nuclear magnetic resonance with gadolin was always used in refractory cases. RESULTS: The Epley manoeuvre showed an efficacy of 74.6 and 100% at first attempt for posterior and superior canals respectively. The efficacy of the Lempert manoeuvre for the horizontal canal was 72.72% in the patients with canalolithiasis, and 58.33% in the patients with cupulolithiasis. The treatment of patients with more than one affected canal and a history of surgery in the previous month was more difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Particle repositioning manoeuvres show a very high success rate, allowing better results in the treatment of the posterior canal. We need more studies to confirm the suspicion that surgery may be a factor of poorer prognosis.


Assuntos
Vertigem Posicional Paroxística Benigna/terapia , Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Canais Semicirculares , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA