Long-term outcome of controlled, non-heart-beating donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have established the feasibility of using livers from controlled, non-heart-beating donors (CNHBD) with good immediate graft function. This has been largely borne out of necessity because of the donor shortage. METHODS: Retrospective database review for the last 7 years (1995-2002), encompassing 19 patients receiving CNHBD, with follow-up period of 1,000 +/- 694 days, median 762 days. Detailed review of recipient characteristics, operative and clinical course, immunosuppression, complications, survival rates, and comparison with the results obtained in patients receiving transplants of allografts procured in standard fashion, from heart-beating donors RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier patient survival rates were 100%, 89.5%, and 83.5% at 30 days, 1, and 2 years, respectively, which is not different from recipients of livers procured from heart-beating cadaveric donors (P=0.74, log-rank test). Five patients died at a mean follow-up time of 492 (range 46-1,103) days. The causes of death were related to secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n=1), cardiac failure (n=1), and sepsis (n=3). Two (10.5%) recipients underwent retransplantation, one for primary graft nonfunction and one because of biliary cast syndrome with cholangitis. Significant preservation damage (ALT>2,000) developed in five patients, but this did not affect survival. The incidence of vascular (15.6% vs. 9.6%, P=0.34) and biliary complications (10.55 vs. 13.8%, P=0.68) was no different than for those recipients receiving standard cadaveric donors. CONCLUSIONS: CNHBD safely expands the donor pool with similar long-term results as those obtained in patients receiving organs from brain-dead donors under standard procurement techniques.

Progression of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis is the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). HCV recurrence is universal after OLTx, with a highly variable course. This study aimed to find factors that affect progression of fibrosis in recurrent HCV. METHODS: Fifty-eight HCV patients underwent OLTx at our center who were selected on the basis of available preOLTx serum or explanted liver sample and liver biopsy obtained at least 6 months postOLTx. All liver biopsies were performed when clinically indicated and were scored using the modified Hepatitis Activity Index (HAI). Primary immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and prednisone. RESULTS: The group included 41 males (mean age 49.6 years). HCV genotype distribution was 1a, 31 (53%); 1b, 16 (28%), and others 11 (19%). The mean follow-up was 53.1 months. Patients with genotype 1a (n=31; mean 46.3 months) had significantly lower fibrosis-free survival analyzed by the presence of fibrosis stages 5 and 6 when compared with other genotypes (n=27; mean 60.1 months; P=0.0088, log rank test). Mean HAI scores were significantly higher in HCV genotype 1a, although there were no differences in survival between genotypes. Similarly, patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection postOLTx (n=4) had a higher fibrosis progression rate compared with those without CMV (n=54) (mean fibrosis-free survival 29.0 vs. 53.0 months P=0.0004, log-rank test). Human leukocyte antigen matching and rate of acute rejection did not influence progression of fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCV genotype 1a and those developing CMV postOLTx have a higher rate of hepatic fibrosis progression after OLTx for HCV-related chronic liver disease.

Safe use of livers from donors with positive hepatitis B core antibody.

Thirty-five patients received liver transplants using liver donors who had positive test results for the hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). In the same time frame, 195 patients received HBcAb-negative liver donors. Mean follow up for patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors was 25 months. All patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors were monitored for recurrence of hepatitis B (HBV) with HBV DNA assays. There was no de novo HBV in recipients of HBcAb-negative grafts. In the group of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors, 4 of 35 patients died within 3 months after transplant with no evidence of HBV recurrence at time of death. Four patients were transplanted for HBV-related disease and were postoperatively placed on lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). HBV recurrence was seen in one of these patients. Of the remaining 27 patients, three of three mismatched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-negative recipient) developed de novo HBV (100%). Of 24 matched patients (HBcAb-positive donor to HBcAb-positive recipient), only two (7%) developed recurrent HBV allograft reinfection. All de novo and recurrent HBV infections were successfully managed with HBIG and lamivudine therapy. Survival for this subgroup of patients receiving HBcAb-positive donors for non-HBV-related liver disease was 100%. We conclude that the judicious use of HBcAb-positive donors is reasonably safe and associated with low morbidity and mortality, with the appropriate follow-up protocols. Additionally, lamivudine use can be reserved for those cases with de novo or recurrent HBV in the liver allograft, or, selectively, as prophylaxis in those recipients patients who are naïve to HBV and receive an HBcAb-positive donor.