Inferior Outcomes of EU Versus US Patients Treated With CD19 CAR-T for Relapsed/Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma: Association With Differences in Tumor Burden, Systemic Inflammation, Bridging Therapy Utilization, and CAR-T Product Use.

Real-world evidence suggests a trend toward inferior survival of patients receiving CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in Europe (EU) and with tisagenlecleucel. The underlying logistic, patient- and disease-related reasons for these discrepancies remain poorly understood. In this multicenter retrospective observational study, we studied the patient-individual journey from CAR-T indication to infusion, baseline features, and survival outcomes in 374 patients treated with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) or axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel) in EU and the United States (US). Compared with US patients, EU patients had prolonged indication-to-infusion intervals (66 versus 50 d; P < 0.001) and more commonly received intermediary therapies (holding and/or bridging therapy, 94% in EU versus 74% in US; P < 0.001). Baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (median 321 versus 271 U/L; P = 0.02) and ferritin levels (675 versus 425 ng/mL; P = 0.004) were significantly elevated in the EU cohort. Overall, we observed inferior survival in EU patients (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.1 versus 9.2 months in US; P < 0.001) and with tisa-cel (3.2 versus 9.2 months with axi-cel; P < 0.001). On multivariate Lasso modeling, nonresponse to bridging, elevated ferritin, and increased C-reactive protein represented independent risks for treatment failure. Weighing these variables into a patient-individual risk balancer (high risk [HR] balancer), we found higher levels in EU versus US and tisa-cel versus axi-cel cohorts. Notably, superior PFS with axi-cel was exclusively evident in patients at low risk for progression (according to the HR balancer), but not in high-risk patients. These data demonstrate that inferior survival outcomes in EU patients are associated with longer time-to-infusion intervals, higher tumor burden/LDH levels, increased systemic inflammatory markers, and CAR-T product use.

Outcomes of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Reduced Renal Function Including Dialysis.

Patients with renal impairment (RI) are typically excluded from trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. We evaluated the outcomes of patients with RI receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) after 2 or more prior lines of therapy, renal and survival outcomes were compared based on RI and fludarabine dose reduction (DR) status. RI was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using day -5 creatinine (Cr) values. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified and graded using standard Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Renal recovery was considered to occur if Cr was within .2 mg/mL of baseline by day +30. Fludarabine was considered DR if given at <90% of the recommended Food and Drug Administration label dose. Among 166 patients treated with CAR T cell therapy were 17 patients (10.2%) with baseline RI and 149 (89.8%) without RI. After CAR T cell infusion, the incidence of any grade AKI was not significantly different between patients with baseline RI and those without RI (42% versus 21%; P = .08). Similarly, severe grade 2/3 AKI was seen in 1 of 17 patients (5.8%) with baseline RI and in 11 of 149 patients (7.3%) without RI (P = 1). Decreased renal perfusion (28 of 39; 72%) was the most common cause of AKI, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) contributing to 17 of 39 AKIs (44%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients with RI and those without RI or between those who received standard-dose fludarabine and those who received reduced-dose fludarabine. In contrast, patients with AKI had worse clinical outcomes than those without AKI (multivariable PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.7; OS: HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.4). Notably, peak inflammatory cytokine levels were higher in patients who experienced AKI. Finally, we describe 2 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis who received lymphodepletion and CAR T cell therapy. Baseline renal function did not affect renal or efficacy outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in DLBCL. On the other hand, patients with AKI went on to experience worse clinical outcomes. AKI was commonly related to CRS and high peak inflammatory cytokine levels. CAR T cell therapy is feasible in patients with ESRD and requires careful planning of lymphodepletion.

The CAR-HEMATOTOX risk-stratifies patients for severe infections and disease progression after CD19 CAR-T in R/R LBCL.

BACKGROUND: CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) represents a promising treatment modality for an increasing number of B-cell malignancies. However, prolonged cytopenias and infections substantially contribute to the toxicity burden of CAR-T. The recently developed CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score-composed of five pre-lymphodepletion variables (eg, absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, ferritin)-enables risk stratification of hematological toxicity. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we characterized early infection events (days 0-90) and clinical outcomes in 248 patients receiving standard-of-care CD19 CAR-T for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. This included a derivation cohort (cohort A, 179 patients) and a second independent validation cohort (cohort B, 69 patients). Cumulative incidence curves were calculated for all-grade, grade ≥3, and specific infection subtypes. Clinical outcomes were studied via Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis adjusted for other baseline features, the HT score identified patients at high risk for severe infections (adjusted HR 6.4, 95% CI 3.1 to 13.1). HThigh patients more frequently developed severe infections (40% vs 8%, p<0.0001)-particularly severe bacterial infections (27% vs 0.9%, p<0.0001). Additionally, multivariate analysis of post-CAR-T factors revealed that infection risk was increased by prolonged neutropenia (≥14 days) and corticosteroid use (≥9 days), and decreased with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis. Antibacterial prophylaxis significantly reduced the likelihood of severe bacterial infections in HThigh (16% vs 46%, p<0.001), but not HTlow patients (0% vs 2%, p=n.s.). Collectively, HThigh patients experienced worse median progression-free (3.4 vs 12.6 months) and overall survival (9.1 months vs not-reached), and were hospitalized longer (median 20 vs 16 days). Severe infections represented the most common cause of non-relapse mortality after CAR-T and were associated with poor survival outcomes. A trend toward increased non-relapse mortality in HThigh patients was observed (8.0% vs 3.7%, p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the utility of the HT score to risk-stratify patients for infectious complications and poor survival outcomes prior to CD19 CAR-T. High-risk patients likely benefit from anti-infective prophylaxis and should be closely monitored for potential infections and relapse.