Management of psoriatic arthritis in rheumatology and dermatology settings: sub-analysis of the Italian population from the international LOOP study.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients are often treated by dermatology and rheumatology specialities and may receive different treatments. To evaluate the impact of dermatology/rheumatology specialist settings on diagnosis and therapeutic approach in PsA patients. This cross-sectional multicounty study in Italy involved twenty-eight rheumatology or dermatology clinics. Patients with suspected or confirmed PsA were examined by both a dermatologist and a rheumatologist. A total of 413 patients were enrolled and 347 (84%) were diagnosed with PsA. The majority of patients were enrolled from a rheumatology setting (N = 224, 64.6%). Patients with PsA in the dermatology settings had significantly higher disease activity, including skin involvement and musculoskeletal symptoms. Time from PsA onset to diagnosis was 22.3 ± 53.8 vs. 39.4 ± 77.5 months (p = 0.63) in rheumatology and dermatology settings; time from diagnosis to initiation of csDMARD was 7.3 ± 27.5 vs. 19.5 ± 50.6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In contrast, time from diagnosis to bDMARD use was shorter in dermatology settings (54.9 ± 69 vs. 44.2 ± 65.6 months, p = 0.09, rheumatology vs. dermatology), similar to the time taken from first csDMARDs and bDMARDs (48.7 ± 67.9 vs. 35.3 ± 51.9 months, p = 0.34). The choice to visit a rheumatologist over a dermatologist was positively associated with female gender and swollen joints and negatively associated with delay in time from musculoskeletal symptom onset to PsA diagnosis. This study highlights a diagnostic delay emerging from both settings with significantly different therapeutic approaches. Our data reinforce the importance of implementing efficient strategies to improve early identification of PsA that can benefit from the integrated management of PsA patients. Key Points • A diagnostic delay was observed from both dermatology and rheumatology settings with significantly different therapeutic approaches. • Shared dermatology and rheumatology clinics offer the combined expertise to improve in the early identification and management of PsA.

Skin fibrosis correlates with circulating thyrotropin levels in systemic sclerosis: translational association with Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease, characterized by cutaneous and multi-organ fibrosis, and vascular abnormalities. Skin thickening is a characteristic feature of SSc and resembles myxedematous skin. Our aim was to correlate the degree of skin involvement in SSc patients with serum TSH levels, since TSH receptors are widely expressed in human tissues, including the skin. In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 70 SSc patients, all females with a mean age of 47 ± 11 year. Thirty-five age- and sex-matched HT patients were recruited, as controls. Subjects under L-thyroxine therapy and/or with positive anti-TSH receptor antibodies were excluded. In all subjects, we measured serum TSH, FT4, and free tri-iodothyronine (FT3) levels. Skin thickness was evaluated using the modified Rodnan total skin score (mRSS). mRSS averaged 14 ± 9 for SSc and 4 ± 6 for HT patients. TSH levels positively correlated with skin scores in both SSc and HT patients groups. In SSc patients, FT3 and FT4 showed an inverse correlation with mRSS, while in HT only FT4 levels showed this inverse significance. When divided by cutaneous extent, SSc patients with diffuse disease form had higher TSH serum levels compared to those with the limited form; additionally, the correlations between TSH, FT4, and mRSS reached statistical significance. Our preliminary data clearly indicate that serum TSH is higher in SSc patients with more severe skin disease, and significantly correlate with the mRSS. Therefore, TSH could play a role in the development of cutaneous changes in SSc patients.