RESUMO
Background: An international panel of obesity medicine experts from multiple professional organizations examined patterns of obesity care and current obesity treatment guidelines to identify areas requiring updating in response to emerging science and clinical evidence. Aims: The panel focused on multiple medical health and societal issues influencing effective treatment of obesity and identified several unmet needs in the definition, assessment, and care of obesity. Methods: The panel was held in Leesburg, Virginia in September 2019. Results: The panelists recommended addressing these unmet needs in obesity medicine through research, education, evaluation of delivery and payment of care, and updating clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to better reflect obesity's pathophysiological basis and heterogeneity, as well as the disease's health, sociocultural, and economic complications; effects on quality of life; need for standards for quantitative comparison of treatment benefits, risks, and costs; and the need to more effectively integrate obesity treatment guidelines into routine clinical practice and to facilitate more direct clinician participation to improve public understanding of obesity as a disease with a pathophysiological basis. The panel also recommended that professional organizations working to improve the care of people with obesity collaborate via a working group to develop an updated, patient-focused, comprehensive CPG establishing standards of care, addressing identified needs, and providing for routine, periodic review and updating. Conclusions: Unmet needs in the definition, assessment and treatment of obesity were identified and a blueprint to address these needs developed via a clinical practice guideline that can be utilized worldwide to respond to the increasing prevalence of obesity.
RESUMO
The improved efficacy and generally favorable safety profile of recently approved and emerging antiobesity medications (AOMs), which result in an average weight reduction of ≥15%, represent significant advancement in the treatment of obesity. This narrative review aims to provide practical evidence-based recommendations for nutritional assessment, management, and monitoring of patients treated with AOMs. Prior to treatment, clinicians can identify preexisting nutritional risk factors and counsel their patients on recommended intakes of protein, dietary fiber, micronutrients, and fluids. During treatment with AOMs, ongoing monitoring can facilitate early recognition and management of gastrointestinal symptoms or inadequate nutrient or fluid intake. Attention should also be paid to other factors that can impact response to treatment and quality of life, such as physical activity and social and emotional health. In the context of treatment with AOMs, clinicians can play an active role in supporting their patients with obesity to improve their health and well-being and promote optimal nutritional and medical outcomes.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Obesidade , Humanos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Avaliação Nutricional , Qualidade de Vida , Estado Nutricional , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Exercício FísicoAssuntos
Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon , Hipoglicemiantes , Estilo de Vida , Obesidade , Humanos , Exercício Físico , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/terapia , Redução de Peso , Estilo de Vida SaudávelRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview of the history, mechanism of action, and expected treatment effects of the anti-obesity medication (AOM), phentermine. It also includes a summary of recent research and practical guidance for prescribing clinicians. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research on phentermine is sparse and consists primarily of observational studies with methodologic limitations. These studies suggest that phentermine use is associated with clinically significant weight loss in adults and that the medication is generally well tolerated. Large-scale observational studies evaluating phentermine's safety have not identified an increased risk of cardiovascular events or elevations in blood pressure. There is no data to support the notion that phentermine is addictive. Although it remains the most commonly prescribed AOM in the USA, phentermine has little rigorous research to support its efficacy and safety in long-term treatment, which creates a dilemma with guideline-recommended chronic use of AOMs. While we await forthcoming conclusive data on this front, clinicians may consider using phentermine long-term in selected patients, if such prescribing is consistent with local regulatory statutes.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Fentermina , Adulto , Humanos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/farmacologia , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/complicações , Fentermina/farmacologiaRESUMO
Historically, obesity was viewed as a lifestyle disease, with an associated lifestyle solution, and approaches that embody the "eat less, move more" idea have dominated obesity treatment recommendations for over half a century. Meanwhile, the prevalence and severity of obesity continue to increase globally. Enter the so-called "game changers": glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. In the media frenzy around these and other new antiobesity medications in the pipeline, lifestyle-based treatment researchers and practitioners may find themselves wondering whether behavioral approaches to obesity will become obsolete in this new therapeutic era. In this Perspective, the authors contend that medical approaches impact physiologic pathways to support the success of behavioral approaches. Similarly, behavioral approaches can improve weight loss-adjacent outcomes that are not addressed by medication. Thus, the two approaches are complementary and must coexist if we are to make a significant, population-level impact on the obesity epidemic.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Obesidade , Humanos , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Redução de Peso , Estilo de VidaRESUMO
AIM: The effects of weight loss with a partial or total meal replacement programme (MRP) on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors are not fully understood, in particular in people at higher CV risk. In the 52-week randomized controlled OPTIWIN study in men and women with obesity, meal replacement programme (total for first 26 weeks, partial for the ensuing 26 weeks) with OPTIFAST (OP) resulted in significantly greater weight loss compared with a low-calorie food-based (FB) dietary plan, both as part of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention [OP (n = 135)/FB (n = 138) week 26: -12.4%/-6.0%, p < .001; week 52: -10.5%/-5.5%, p < .001]. Here, we examined effects on ASCVD risk factors and 10-year ASCVD risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with body mass index 30-55 kg/m2 and age 18-70 years, and not on anti-obesity medications, were recruited. The effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), lipid parameters and 10-year ASCVD risk were analysed as changes over time using linear mixed models. Subgroup analyses were conducted for changes in SBP, DBP and ASCVD risk by categories of age (<40, 40-59, ≥60 years), baseline SBP (≥130 mmHg) and sex. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced (OP/FB females 86%/79%, mean age 47/47 years, body mass index 38.4/39.2 kg/m2 , 10-year ASCVD risk <5% 87%/74%, dysglycaemia 52%/50%). At week 26, SBP/DBP were significantly reduced with OP versus FB, and a greater proportion achieved BP ≤130/80 mmHg [odds ratio 2.11 (95% confidence interval 1.10, 4.03), p = .024]. All lipid parameters as well as 10-year ASCVD risk were significantly improved with OP versus FB. A similar, but slightly attenuated pattern was observed at 52 weeks. Across subgroups, greater reductions for SBP, DBP and ASCVD risk were generally seen with OP versus FB with quantitatively higher baseline SBP and age, and in men. CONCLUSIONS: In people with obesity at low ASCVD risk, OP significantly reduced cardiovascular risk factors and 10-year predicted risk for ASCVD.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Hipertensão , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Pressão Sanguínea , Fatores de Risco , Redução de Peso , Lipídeos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Background: Despite recognized improvements in obesity-related comorbidities, mounting evidence implicates surgical weight loss in the onset of skeletal fragility. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure and is associated with 3-7% axial bone loss in the year following surgery. Bisphosphonates are FDA-approved medications for the prevention and treatment of age-related bone loss and may represent a strategy to reduce bone loss following SG surgery. Methods: The Strategies to Reduce the Onset of Sleeve Gastrectomy Associated Bone Loss (STRONG BONES) trial (NCT04922333) is designed to definitively test whether monthly administration of the bisphosphonate, risedronate, for six months can effectively counter SG-associated bone loss. Approximately 120 middle-aged and older (≥40 years) SG patients will be randomized to six months of risedronate or placebo treatment, with skeletal outcomes assessed at baseline, six, and 12-months post-surgery. The primary outcome of the trial is 12-month change in total hip areal bone mineral density (aBMD), measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This will be complemented by DXA-acquired aBMD assessment at other skeletal sites and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) derived changes in bone quality. Change in muscle mass and function will also be assessed, as well as biomarkers of bone health, turnover, and crosstalk, providing mechanistic insight into intervention-related changes to the bone-muscle unit. Discussion: Results from the STRONG BONES trial have the potential to influence current clinical practice by determining the ability of bisphosphonate use to mitigate bone loss and concomitant fracture risk in middle-aged and older SG patients.
RESUMO
Background: Despite robust weight loss and cardiometabolic benefit, lean mass loss following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) confers health risk. Bisphosphonates are a potential therapeutic agent for lean mass maintenance. Thus, our objective was to explore the effect of six months of risedronate (vs placebo) on change in dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT) derived lean mass metrics in the year following SG. Methods: 24 SG patients were randomized to six months of 150 mg oral risedronate or placebo capsules (NCT03411902). Body composition was assessed at baseline and six months with optional 12-month follow-up using whole-body DXA and CT at the lumbar spine and mid-thigh. Group treatment effects and 95% CIs were generated from a mixed model using contrast statements at six and 12 months, adjusted for baseline values. Results: Of 24 participants enrolled [55.7±6.7 years (mean±SD), 79% Caucasian, 83% women, body mass index (BMI) 44.7±6.3kg/m2], 21 returned for six-month testing, and 14 returned for 12-month testing. Six-month weight loss was -16.3 kg (-20.0, -12.5) and -20.9 kg (-23.7, -18.1) in the risedronate and placebo groups, respectively (p=.057). Primary analysis at six-months revealed a non-significant sparing of appendicular lean mass in the risedronate group compared to placebo [-1.2 kg (-2.3, -0.1) vs -2.1 kg (-3.0, -1.2)]; p=.20. By 12-months, the risedronate group displayed no change in appendicular lean mass from baseline [-0.5 kg (-1.5, 0.6)]; however, the placebo group experienced significantly augmented loss [-2.9 kg (-3.6, -2.1)]. Conclusion: Pilot data indicate risedronate treatment may mitigate appendicular lean mass loss following SG. Further study is warranted.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with BMI≥50 kg/m2 is challenging. In previous work, pre and postoperative pharmacotherapy with phentermine/topiramate plus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (PT + SG) promoted greater weight loss than sleeve gastrectomy (SG) alone at 24 mo postoperatively. This current secondary analysis studied the impact of PT + SG on blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and antihypertensive usage. METHODS: Patients with BMI≥50 kg/m2 planning to have SG (n = 13) were recruited from 2014 to 2016, at an academic medical center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for this open-label trial. Participants took phentermine/topiramate (PT; 7.5/46-15/92 mg/d) for ≥3 mo preoperatively and 24 mo postoperatively. The control group (n = 40) underwent SG during the same time frame. We used mixed models for BP and heart rate to compare PT + SG versus SG alone over time, adjusted for age, sex, and initial BP. RESULTS: By 24 mo postoperatively the model adjusted changes in systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) (mm Hg) were -24.44 (-34.46,-14.43)/-28.60 (-40.74,-16.46) in the PT + SG group versus -11.81 (-17.58,-6.05)/-13.89 (-21.32,-6.46) in the control group (SBP P = 0.02; DBP P = 0.03). At baseline 8 (61.5%) participants in the PT + SG arm and 22 (55.0%) in the control group used antihypertensives. Excluding patients lost to follow-up (n = 3), by 24 mo postoperatively, none of the PT + SG participants were on antihypertensives compared to 14 (41.2%) in the control group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BMI≥50 kg/m2 treated with PT + SG had greater improvement in BP with no use of antihypertensive medication at 24 mo postoperatively versus SG alone, where 41% continued medication use. Larger trials are required to evaluate this.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/etiologia , Fentermina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Topiramato , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Obesity is a growing public health crisis in the United States and is associated with a substantial disease burden due to an increased risk for multiple complications, including cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. As highlighted in this review, obesity disproportionately affects the African American population, women in particular, regardless of socioeconomic status. Structural racism remains a major contributor to health disparities between African American people and the general population, and it limits access to healthy foods, safe spaces to exercise, adequate health insurance, and medication, all of which impact obesity prevalence and outcomes. Conscious and unconscious interpersonal racism also impacts obesity care and outcomes in African American people and may adversely affect interactions between health care practitioners and patients. To reduce health disparities, structural racism and racial bias must be addressed. Culturally relevant interventions for obesity management have been successfully implemented that have shown benefits in weight management and risk-factor reduction. Strategies to improve health care practitioner-patient engagement should also be implemented to improve health outcomes in African American people with obesity. When managing obesity in African American people, it is critical to take a holistic approach and to consider an individual's social and cultural context in order to implement a successful treatment strategy.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Racismo , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/terapia , Classe SocialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US, has been associated with an overrepresentation or paucity of several microbial taxa in the gut microbiota, but causality has not been established. Black men and women have among the highest CRC incidence and mortality rates of any racial/ethnic group. This study will examine the impact of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on gut microbiota and fecal metabolites associated with CRC risk. METHODS: A generally healthy sample of non-Hispanic Black and white adults (n = 112) is being recruited to participate in a parallel-arm randomized controlled feeding study. Participants are randomized to receive the DASH diet or a standard American diet for a 28-day period. Fecal samples are collected weekly throughout the study to analyze changes in the gut microbiota using 16 s rRNA and selected metagenomics. Differences in bacterial alpha and beta diversity and taxa that have been associated with CRC (Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Ruminococcus, Porphyromonas, Succinivibrio) are being evaluated. Covariate measures include body mass index, comorbidities, medication history, physical activity, stress, and demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Our findings will provide preliminary evidence for the DASH diet as an approach for cultivating a healthier gut microbiota across non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White adults. These results can impact clinical, translational, and population-level approaches for modification of the gut microbiota to reduce risk of chronic diseases including CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04538482, on September 4, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04538482).
Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , População Branca , Fezes/microbiologia , Dieta , Bactérias/genética , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Excess adiposity is characterized by alterations in adipokine secretion such that circulating leptin concentrations are increased with reductions in adiponectin. An emerging biomarker for the assessment of this adipose tissue (AT) dysfunction is the adiponectin:leptin (AL) ratio. A low AL ratio may be suggestive of dysfunctional AT and, consequently, a heightened cardiometabolic disease risk. This ancillary study investigated the relationship between the AL ratio and cardiometabolic health among community-dwelling older adults with obesity, as well as the effects of a 12-month exercise and diet intervention on changes in the AL ratio. METHODS: Participants (n = 163, 70.2 ± 4.7 years, 38.0% male) were randomized to the exercise only group, exercise + nutrient-dense weight maintenance group (exercise + weight maintenance), or exercise + nutrient-dense caloric restriction of 500 kcal/d group (exercise + intentional weight loss) (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00955903). Total and regional adiposity as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), anthropometrics, and cardiometabolic biomarkers were assessed at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: The AL ratio was significantly (p < 0.05) inversely correlated with body mass index, waist circumference, measures of adiposity, and insulin among all participants at baseline. Among females only, significant positive and inverse correlations were also observed between this ratio and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the inflammatory biomarkers high sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6, respectively. While controlling for biological sex, a significant time by intervention group interaction effect (p < 0.05) was observed such that the AL ratio significantly increased from baseline to study completion among participants in the exercise + weight maintenance group and exercise + intentional weight loss group. Post hoc analysis revealed that the exercise + intentional weight loss group exhibited a significantly greater AL ratio at study completion compared to other groups (p < 0.05 all). CONCLUSIONS: Results are in support of the AL ratio as a measure of AT dysfunction among older adults. Furthermore, results suggest that a 12-month exercise and diet intervention with intentional weight loss assists in improving the AL ratio in this population.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Leptina , Adiponectina/metabolismo , Idoso , Biomarcadores , Dieta Redutora , Feminino , Humanos , Leptina/metabolismo , Masculino , Obesidade/metabolismo , Redução de PesoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/INTRODUCTION: It is imperative to accurately estimate whole body fat percentage (%fat) to understand the deleterious nature of excess adiposity on cardiometabolic disease risk. Cost and accessibility often preclude the use of advanced imaging methods like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Relative fat mass (RFM) is an emerging estimator of whole body %fat based on waist circumference, height, and biological sex. The purpose of this ancillary study was to examine the relationship between RFM and gold-standard measures of adiposity among community-dwelling older adults with obesity and to evaluate if changes in RFM reflect changes in %fat following a 12-month lifestyle intervention (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00955903). PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants (N = 163, 37.4% male, 70.3 ± 4.7 years) were randomized to the exercise only group, exercise + nutrient-dense weight maintenance group, or exercise + nutrient-dense energy restriction of 500 kcal/d group. Total and regional adiposity assessed by DXA and MRI, as well as anthropometrics, were evaluated at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: RFM was significantly positively correlated with DXA whole body %fat and DXA trunk %fat at baseline. Equivalence testing revealed that RFM was considered equivalent to DXA whole body %fat for females only. Additionally, from baseline to 12 months, a significant reduction in RFM was observed among female participants in the exercise + energy restriction group only. Changes in RFM were significantly correlated with changes in DXA whole body %fat, DXA trunk fat, and total abdominal fat tissue determined by MRI. CONCLUSION: Results support the use of RFM as an estimate of whole body %fat where advanced imaging techniques are not feasible. Furthermore, results suggest that this index is sensitive to changes in fat mass over 12 months in female older adults with obesity. KEY MESSAGESRelative fat mass (RFM), an emerging estimator of whole body %fat based on waist circumference, height, and biological sex, was intentionally developed to be a simple estimate of adiposity that overcomes limitations of measures like body mass index.In the current study, results from correlations and agreement analyses support the use of RFM to estimate whole-body fat percentage in a community-dwelling older adult population with obesity when advanced methods, namely dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, are not feasible.Significant reductions in RFM were also observed over a 12-month period that was significantly correlated with changes in whole body fat percentage; thus, supporting the sensitivity of RFM to lifestyle changes.
Assuntos
Adiposidade , Obesidade , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/diagnóstico por imagem , Obesidade/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Obesity imposes risk to cardiometabolic health; however, intentional weight loss among older adults with obesity remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of exercise plus weight maintenance and exercise plus intentional weight loss by caloric restriction on changes in cardiometabolic risk among older adults with obesity assessed by four risk-scoring tools. DESIGN: Using longitudinal data from the Calorie Restriction and Changes in Body Composition, Disease, Function, and Quality of Life in Older Adults study (CROSSROADS) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00955903; May 2009 to October 2014), scores were calculated using baseline and 12-month data according to criteria from the International Diabetes Federation, National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel, Framingham Risk Score, and Cardiometabolic Disease Staging. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Participants (39% men, 23% African American, aged 70.2 ± 4.7 years) were randomized to exercise (n = 48), exercise plus nutrient-dense weight maintenance diet (n = 44), or exercise plus weight loss by moderate caloric restriction (n = 42). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To evaluate effects of exercise plus weight maintenance and exercise plus intentional weight loss on changes in cardiometabolic risk. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Generalized estimating equations were used to assess changes in risk with ethnicity, biological sex, and age as covariates. RESULTS: Group-time interaction was only significant for Framingham and Cardiometabolic Disease Staging (P = 0.005 and 0.041, respectively). Upon post hoc analysis, significant within-group improvements in Framingham scores were observed for exercise plus weight maintenance (P < 0.001; r = -1.682) and exercise plus weight loss (P = 0.020; r = -0.881). In analysis of between-group differences in Framingham scores, significant decreases were observed in the exercise plus weight maintenance group (P = 0.001; r = -1.723) compared with the exercise group. For Cardiometabolic Disease Staging, the exercise plus weight loss group had significant within-group improvements (P = 0.023; r = -0.102). For between-group differences in Cardiometabolic Disease Staging, the exercise plus weight loss group showed significant risk reduction (P = 0.012; r = -0.142) compared with the exercise group. CONCLUSIONS: Among risk scores evaluated, Framingham and Cardiometabolic Disease Staging showed significantly greater sensitivity to change in cardiometabolic risk. Older adults with obesity can significantly lower cardiometabolic risk through exercise plus weight maintenance or exercise plus weight loss by moderate caloric restriction.
Assuntos
Restrição Calórica , Exercício Físico , Manejo da Obesidade/métodos , Obesidade/terapia , Idoso , Composição Corporal , Manutenção do Peso Corporal , Fatores de Risco Cardiometabólico , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Redução de PesoRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of 150 mg once monthly oral risedronate use in the prevention of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) associated bone loss. Twenty-four SG patients (56 ± 7 years, 83% female, 21% black) were randomized to risedronate or placebo for 6 months, with an optional 12-month assessment. Outcome measures included 6 (n = 21) and 12 (n = 14) month change in dual energy x-ray absorptiometry-acquired regional areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Six-month treatment effect estimates [mean (95% CI)] revealed significant between group aBMD differences at the femoral neck [risedronate: +0.013 g/cm2 (-0.021, 0.046) vs. placebo: -0.041 g/cm2 (-0.067, -0.015)] and lumbar spine [risedronate: +0.028 g/cm2 (-0.006, 0.063) vs. placebo: -0.029 g/cm2 (-0.054, -0.004)]; both p ≤ 0.02. When followed postoperatively to 12 months, differential aBMD treatment effects were observed at the total hip [risedronate: -0.035 g/cm2 (-0.061, -0.009) vs. placebo: -0.072 g/cm2 (-0.091, -0.052)] and lumbar spine [risedronate: +0.012 g/cm2 (-0.038, 0.063) vs. placebo: -0.052 g/cm2 (-0.087, -0.017)]; both p < 0.05. Preliminary treatment effect estimates signal 6 months of risedronate use may be efficacious in reducing aBMD loss at the axial skeleton post-SG, with benefit largely maintained throughout the 1-year postoperative period. Confirmatory data from an adequately powered trial are needed.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Densidade Óssea , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Ácido RisedrônicoRESUMO
Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and renal diseases in the United States and worldwide. Obesity accounts for much of the risk for primary hypertension through several mechanisms, including neurohormonal activation, inflammation, and kidney dysfunction. As the prevalence of obesity continues to increase, hypertension and associated cardiorenal diseases will also increase unless more effective strategies to prevent and treat obesity are developed. Lifestyle modification, including diet, reduced sedentariness, and increased physical activity, is usually recommended for patients with obesity; however, the long-term success of these strategies for reducing adiposity, maintaining weight loss, and reducing blood pressure has been limited. Effective pharmacotherapeutic and procedural strategies, including metabolic surgeries, are additional options to treat obesity and prevent or attenuate obesity hypertension, target organ damage, and subsequent disease. Medications can be useful for short- and long-term obesity treatment; however, prescription of these drugs is limited. Metabolic surgery is effective for producing sustained weight loss and for treating hypertension and metabolic disorders in many patients with severe obesity. Unanswered questions remain related to the mechanisms of obesity-related diseases, long-term efficacy of different treatment and prevention strategies, and timing of these interventions to prevent obesity and hypertension-mediated target organ damage. Further investigation, including randomized controlled trials, is essential to addressing these questions, and emphasis should be placed on the prevention of obesity to reduce the burden of hypertensive cardiovascular and kidney diseases and subsequent mortality.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , American Heart Association , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Depressores do Apetite/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipertensão/terapia , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Orlistate/uso terapêutico , Fentermina/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Importance: The 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee conducted a systematic review of existing research on diet and health to inform the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The committee answered this public health question: what is the association between dietary patterns consumed and all-cause mortality (ACM)? Objective: To ascertain the association between dietary patterns consumed and ACM. Evidence Review: Guided by an analytical framework and predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria developed by the committee, the US Department of Agriculture's Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase and dual-screened the results to identify articles that were published between January 1, 2000, and October 4, 2019. These studies evaluated dietary patterns and ACM in participants aged 2 years and older. The NESR team extracted data from and assessed risk of bias in included studies. Committee members synthesized the evidence, developed conclusion statements, and graded the strength of the evidence supporting the conclusion statements. Findings: A total of 1 randomized clinical trial and 152 observational studies were included in the review. Studies enrolled adults and older adults (aged 17-84 years at baseline) from 28 countries with high or very high Human Development Index; 53 studies originated from the US. Most studies were well designed, used rigorous methods, and had low or moderate risks of bias. Precision, directness, and generalizability were demonstrated across the body of evidence. Results across studies were highly consistent. Evidence suggested that dietary patterns in adults and older adults that involved higher consumption of vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, whole grains, unsaturated vegetable oils, fish, and lean meat or poultry (when meat was included) were associated with a decreased risk of ACM. These healthy patterns were also relatively low in red and processed meat, high-fat dairy, and refined carbohydrates or sweets. Some of these dietary patterns also included intake of alcoholic beverages in moderation. Results based on additional analyses with confounding factors generally confirmed the robustness of main findings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review, consuming a nutrient-dense dietary pattern was associated with reduced risk of death from all causes.
Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Dieta Saudável/mortalidade , Dieta Saudável/estatística & dados numéricos , Dieta Saudável/normas , Dieta/mortalidade , Dieta/estatística & dados numéricos , Dieta/normas , Política Nutricional , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Obesity is highly prevalent and associated with several adverse outcomes including health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), work productivity, and activity impairment. The objective of this study is to examine group differences in HRQoL and labor-related health outcomes among participants in the OPTIWIN program, which compared the effectiveness of two intensive behavioral weight loss interventions. Participants (n = 273) were randomized to OPTIFAST®(OP) or food-based (FB) dietary interventions for 52 weeks. HRQoL and labor-related health outcomes were measured at baseline, week 26, and week 52, using two questionnaires. At baseline, there were no differences between groups on the Impact of Weight on Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite). At week 26, the OP group had statistically significant differences towards better HRQoL for Physical Function, Self-Esteem, and the total score compared with the FB group. At week 52, the OP group showed better HRQoL in the total score (p = 0.0012) and in all but one domain. Moreover, the adjusted change-from-baseline normalized total score at week 52 was -5.9 points (p = 0.0001). Finally, the mean IWQOL-Lite normalized score showed that HRQoL improves by 0.4442 units (p < 0.0001) per kg lost, and that greater weight reduction was positively associated with better HRQoL. No statistically significant group differences were found with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (General Health) (WPAI-GH) Questionnaire. HRQoL improves with highly intensive, well-structured weight loss interventions. Greater weight loss lead to larger improvements. The lack of negative effect on productivity and activity suggests that these interventions may be compatible with an active work lifestyle.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Redução de Peso , Peso Corporal , Humanos , Obesidade/terapia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) recommended steps to redesign the process of developing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) are based on 5 guiding principles (enhance transparency; promote diversity of expertise and experience; support a deliberative process; manage biases and conflicts of interest; and adopt state-of-the-art processes and methods). Using these principles and recommendations, the USDA and HHS updated the process for developing the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines, including the process for appointing members and managing the work of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Modifications included having public comment on the topics and questions to be addressed by the Federal Advisory Committee, reviewing professional and financial activities on potential appointees to the committee prior to their appointment, redesigning the website to provide status updates on the work of the committee as analytical frameworks and draft conclusions were developed, strengthening the approaches for conducting systematic reviews, and adding a public meeting for discussion of the final report before its submission to the Secretaries of the USDA and HHS. Because the DGA is reviewed and updated every 5 y, it is possible to learn from each cycle what works well and where improvements in the process can be implemented. The current article illustrates, from the perspective of the advisory committee, the impact of the NASEM report on the development of the scientific report by examining changes in the process consistent with the 5 principles.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Política Nutricional , Viés , Humanos , National Academy of Sciences, U.S. , Relatório de Pesquisa , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identification of nutrients of public health concern has been a hallmark of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA); however, a formal systematic process for identifying them has not been published. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to propose a framework for identifying "nutrients or food components" (NFCs) of public health relevance to inform the DGA. METHODS: The proposed framework consists of 1) defining terminology; 2) establishing quantitative thresholds to identify NFCs; and 3) examining national data. The proposed framework utilizes available data from 3 key data sources or "prongs": 1) dietary intakes; 2) biological endpoints; and 3) clinical health consequences such as prevalence of health conditions, directly or indirectly through validated surrogate markers. RESULTS: In identifying potential NFCs of public health concern, the 2020 DGA Committee developed a decision-tree framework with suggestions for combining the 3 prongs. The identified NFCs of public health concern for Americans ≥1 y old included fiber, calcium (≥2 y old), vitamin D, and potassium for low intakes and sodium, added sugars, and saturated fats (≥2 y old) for high intakes that were associated with adverse health consequences. Iron was identified among infants ages 6-12 mo fed human milk. For reproductive-aged and pregnant females, iron (all trimesters) and folate (first trimester) were identified for low intake, based on dietary and biomarker data (iron) or the severity of the consequence (folic acid and neural tube defects). Among pregnant women, low iodine was of potential public health concern based on biomarker data. Other NFCs that were underconsumed, overconsumed, and pose special challenges were identified across the life course. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed decision-tree framework was intended to streamline and add transparency to the work of this and future Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees to identify NFCs that need to be encouraged or discouraged in order to help reduce risk of chronic disease and promote health and energy balance in the population.