Nintedanib in chronic fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. A case series.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) can be fatal in non-idiopathic interstitial lung diseases. We report a descriptive series of 13 patients with PPF who received treatment with nintedanib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antifibrotic effect. Although the reduced number of patients and the observational nature of a case series prevent us from providing strong evidence, our results suggest that nintedanib could be effective in PPF of various etiologies. Nintedanib could also be useful in specific populations such as patients awaiting lung transplant and elderly patients.

The role of unenhanced phase of the liver in the scanning protocol of metastatic breast cancer: implications for sensitivity, response evaluation and size measurement.

BACKGROUND: To analyse if performing unenhanced CT of the liver aids in the evaluation of metastatic lesions, response assessment or alter the size of the lesions, compared with portal phase alone, in patients with hepatic metastases from breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and fifty-three CT scans of 36 women were included. Scans consisted of unenhanced, arterial and portal delayed phases of the liver. Two readers sorted which phase was best for visualization of metastases, evaluated the number of lesions detected in each phase, selected the best phase for assessment of response in two consecutive scans, and measured one target lesion in all the phases. Χ2 was used to compare differences among phases and paired t test for measurement differences. RESULTS: Unenhanced, arterial and portal phases were considered better phases by readers 1/2 in 68/67%, 27/28% and 69/70%, and some lesions were missed in 2%, 11% and 7%, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly better for unenhanced and portal phases compared to arterial phase. Comparison between consecutive scans was considered better in unenhanced (80/79%), followed by portal (70/69%) and arterial phases (31/31%). Maximum diameter of target lesions was 15% greater in unenhanced phase (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Portal and unenhanced phases of the liver allow better detection and delineation of metastatic hepatic lesions from breast carcinoma. In most cases, unenhanced CT is the best phase to assess response and provides the largest diameter. Therefore, we recommend the use of unenhanced CT in the evaluation of patients with breast carcinoma and suspected or known hepatic metastatic disease.

Early and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating patients with malignant pleural effusion. Results of pairwise comparison by multiple observers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare images from early and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced thoracic CT for assessing pleural thickening or nodules in a series of patients with malignant pleural effusions. METHODS: Blinded images from 36 patients with malignant pleural effusions showing pleural lesions in both early (35 s delayed) and delayed (70 s delayed) phases of thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan were retrospectively assessed by six observers. First, images were individually scored in a six-point scale grading the quality of visualization of pleural findings such as pleural thickening or nodules. This was followed by a paired analysis, where the readers had to choose the one showing the highest quality between two images presented together corresponding to both phases of the same patient showing the same pleural lesion. When possible, contrast attenuation of the abnormal pleura was measured. Statistical analysis was performed by using paired t-test and χ 2. RESULTS: Mean attenuation of pleural lesions was significantly higher in the delayed phase (76.0 ± 25.1 vs 57.5 ± 20.7, p < 0.001). Mean score and score of individual images was statistically significant better for the delayed phase for all observers. In the paired analysis, all the readers preferred the delayed phase over the early phase in 77.8 to 91.7% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Delayed phase of contrast-enhanced CT is preferable to early phase for evaluating pleural findings. Advances in knowledge: Pleural attenuation is greater for the delayed phase compared with the early phase of contrast-enhanced chest CT. In the pairwise comparison, all the observers prefer the delayed phase over the early phase for pleural evaluation.

Best Protocol for Combined Contrast-Enhanced Thoracic and Abdominal CT for Lung Cancer: A Single-Institution Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the superiority of either of two protocols for combined contrast-enhanced thoracic and abdominal CT of patients with lung cancer by comparing contrast enhancement, contrast-related artifacts, image quality, and radiation dose. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled crossover clinical trial, 77 patients who underwent 203 CT examinations were enrolled. All patients underwent at least two examinations performed with both protocols. Protocol A consisted of two acquisitions: one 35-second delayed CT acquisition for the chest followed by a 70-second delayed abdominal acquisition. Protocol B was a single 60-second delayed acquisition covering the chest and the abdomen. Attenuation and noise of the aorta, pulmonary artery, and liver were measured. Contrast-related artifacts, mediastinal lymph node visualization, liver enhancement, and noise were visually scored. Dose-length product was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by t and chi-square tests and kappa statistics. RESULTS: Contrast-related artifacts were more severe at all evaluated levels, and visualization of lymph node regions was statistically significantly worse with protocol A. There were no differences in enhancement or noise score of the liver. Tumor delineation and pleural findings were better evaluated with delayed phase images. Dose-length product was significantly higher with protocol A (645.0 vs 521.5 mGy · cm; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A single 60-second delayed acquisition for thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT is associated with less contrast artifact and affords better visualization of lymph nodes at a lower radiation dose while acceptable vascular and hepatic contrast enhancement is maintained.

Transsphenoidal Approach in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Lesions: What Radiologists and Surgeons Need to Know.

In the last 2 decades, endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery has become the most popular choice of neurosurgeons and otolaryngologists to treat lesions of the skull base, with minimal invasiveness, lower incidence of complications, and lower morbidity and mortality rates compared with traditional approaches. The transsphenoidal route is the surgical approach of choice for most sellar tumors because of the relationship of the sphenoid bone to the nasal cavity below and the pituitary gland above. More recently, extended approaches have expanded the indications for transsphenoidal surgery by using different corridors leading to specific target areas, from the crista galli to the spinomedullary junction. Computer-assisted surgery is an evolving technology that allows real-time anatomic navigation during endoscopic surgery by linking preoperative triplanar radiologic images and intraoperative endoscopic views, thus helping the surgeon avoid damage to vital structures. Preoperative computed tomography is the preferred modality to show bone landmarks and vascular structures. Radiologists play an important role in surgical planning by reporting extension of sphenoid pneumatization, recesses and septations of the sinus, and other relevant anatomic variants. Radiologists should understand the relationships of the sphenoid bone and skull base structures, anatomic variants, and image-guided neuronavigation techniques to prevent surgical complications and allow effective treatment of skull base lesions with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach.